Long-term effectiveness of recommended boosted protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy in Europe
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media print-electronic
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Observational Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
29388732
DOI
10.1111/hiv.12581
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- antiretroviral therapy-experienced patients, antiretroviral therapy-naïve patients, atazanavir/ritonavir, darunavir/ritonavir, lopinavir/ritonavir,
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- HIV Infections drug therapy MeSH
- Anti-HIV Agents therapeutic use MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active methods MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Observational Study MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
- Geographicals
- Europe MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Anti-HIV Agents MeSH
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate the long-term response to antiretroviral treatment (ART) based on atazanavir/ritonavir (ATZ/r)-, darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r)-, and lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r)-containing regimens. METHODS: Data were analysed for 5678 EuroSIDA-enrolled patients starting a DRV/r-, ATZ/r- or LPV/r-containing regimen between 1 January 2000 and 30 June 2013. Separate analyses were performed for the following subgroups of patients: (1) ART-naïve subjects (8%) at ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r) initiation; (2) ART-experienced individuals (44%) initiating the new PI/r with a viral load (VL) ≤500 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL; and (3) ART-experienced patients (48%) initiating the new PI/r with a VL >500 copies/mL. Virological failure (VF) was defined as two consecutive VL measurements >200 copies/mL ≥24 weeks after PI/r initiation. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox models were used to compare risks of failure by PI/r-based regimen. The main analysis was performed with intention-to-treat (ITT) ignoring treatment switches. RESULTS: The time to VF favoured DRV/r over ATZ/r, and both were superior to LPV/r (log-rank test; P < 0.02) in all analyses. Nevertheless, the risk of VF in ART-naïve patients was similar regardless of the PI/r initiated after controlling for potential confounders. The risk of VF in both treatment-experienced groups was lower for DRV/r than for ATZ/r, which, in turn, was lower than for LPV/r-based ART. CONCLUSIONS: Although confounding by indication and calendar year cannot be completely ruled out, in ART-experienced subjects the long-term effectiveness of DRV/r-containing regimens appears to be greater than that of ATZ/r and LPV/r.
Academic Medical Center Amsterdam the Netherlands
Cantonal Hospital St Gallen St Gallen Switzerland
Centre for HIV AIDS and Infectious Diseases Moscow Russia
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint Pierre Brussels Belgium
Charles University Hospital Plzen Czech Republic
Fight Against AIDS Foundation Germans Trias i Pujol University Hospital Barcelona Spain
Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades Paris France
IrsiCaixa AIDS Research Institute Barcelona Spain
Karolinska Institute Venhälsan Stockholm Sweden
Klinicki Centar Univerziteta Sarajevo Sarajevo Bosnia and Herzegovina
Lviv Regional HIV AIDS Prevention and Control Centre Kiev Ukraine
Medizinische Poliklinik Munchen Germany
Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark
Rambam Health Care Campus Haifa Israel
Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
Royal Free and University College London UK
Royal London Hospital London UK
San Raffaele Scientific Institute Milan Italy
Szpital Specjalistyczny Chorzow Poland
The General Hospital of Athens G Gennimatas Athens Greece
Universitat de Vic Universitat Central de Catalunya Barcelona Spain
References provided by Crossref.org