Diagnosis and management of pemphigus: Recommendations of an international panel of experts
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
Grant support
P30 AR069589
NIAMS NIH HHS - United States
R01 AR032599
NIAMS NIH HHS - United States
T32 AR007465
NIAMS NIH HHS - United States
PubMed
29438767
PubMed Central
PMC7313440
DOI
10.1016/j.jaad.2018.02.021
PII: S0190-9622(18)30207-X
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- CD20 inhibitor, consensus, guidelines, pemphigus foliaceus, pemphigus vulgaris, treatment,
- MeSH
- Academies and Institutes standards MeSH
- Antigens, CD20 immunology MeSH
- Delphi Technique MeSH
- Dermatology methods standards MeSH
- Glucocorticoids administration & dosage MeSH
- Immunologic Factors administration & dosage MeSH
- Administration, Intravenous MeSH
- Drug Therapy, Combination methods standards MeSH
- Combined Modality Therapy methods standards MeSH
- Consensus MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Pemphigus diagnosis immunology therapy MeSH
- Plasmapheresis * MeSH
- Rituximab administration & dosage MeSH
- Practice Guidelines as Topic * MeSH
- Severity of Illness Index MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Geographicals
- Europe MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Antigens, CD20 MeSH
- Glucocorticoids MeSH
- Immunologic Factors MeSH
- Rituximab MeSH
BACKGROUND: Several European countries recently developed international diagnostic and management guidelines for pemphigus, which have been instrumental in the standardization of pemphigus management. OBJECTIVE: We now present results from a subsequent Delphi consensus to broaden the generalizability of the recommendations. METHODS: A preliminary survey, based on the European Dermatology Forum and the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology guidelines, was sent to a panel of international experts to determine the level of consensus. The results were discussed at the International Bullous Diseases Consensus Group in March 2016 during the annual American Academy of Dermatology conference. Following the meeting, a second survey was sent to more experts to achieve greater international consensus. RESULTS: The 39 experts participated in the first round of the Delphi survey, and 54 experts from 21 countries completed the second round. The number of statements in the survey was reduced from 175 topics in Delphi I to 24 topics in Delphi II on the basis of Delphi results and meeting discussion. LIMITATIONS: Each recommendation represents the majority opinion and therefore may not reflect all possible treatment options available. CONCLUSIONS: We present here the recommendations resulting from this Delphi process. This international consensus includes intravenous CD20 inhibitors as a first-line therapy option for moderate-to-severe pemphigus.
1st Department of Dermatology Aristotle University Thessaloniki Greece
Clinica Dermatologica Universita' Di Parma Parma Italy
Departamento de Dermatologia Universidade de Sao Paulo Sao Paulo Brazil
Department of Dermatology and Immunodermatology Medical University of Warsaw Warsaw Poland
Department of Dermatology and Venereology Faculty of Medicine Akdeniz University Antalya Turkey
Department of Dermatology and Venereology Medical Faculty University of Medicine Sofia Bulgaria
Department of Dermatology Avicenne Hospital University Paris 13 Bobigny France
Department of Dermatology Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta Georgia
Department of Dermatology Faculty of Medicine Cairo University Cairo Egypt
Department of Dermatology Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine Sapporo Japan
Department of Dermatology Hospital Clínic Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona Spain
Department of Dermatology Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York New York
Department of Dermatology Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
Department of Dermatology Mayo Clinic College of Medicine Rochester Minnesota
Department of Dermatology Reims University Hospital University of Champagne Ardenne Reims France
Department of Dermatology Rouen University Hospital Rouen France
Department of Dermatology School of Medicine University of California Davis California
Department of Dermatology School of Medicine University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah
Department of Dermatology St George Hospital University of New South Wales Sydney Australia
Department of Dermatology University Hospital Marburg Germany
Department of Dermatology University Hospital of Bern Bern Switzerland
Department of Dermatology University of Lubeck Lubeck Germany
Department of Dermatology University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina
Department of Dermatovenereology St Anna University Hospital Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Dermatology Department School of Medicine Karadeniz Technical University Trabzon Turkey
Dermatology Duke University Medical Center Durham
Facultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana Santiago Chile
Kurume University Institute of Cutaneous Cell Biology Kurume Japan
Sheba Medical Center Dermatology Department Tel Hashomer Ramat Gan Israel
St John's Institute of Dermatology Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals London United Kingdom
St Joseph Mercy Health System Department of Dermatology Ann Arbor Michigan
University Hospitals Leicester Leicester Royal Infirmary Leicester United Kingdom
University Medical Center Groningen University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands
See more in PubMed
Mimouni D, Nousari C, Cummins D, Kouba D, David M, Anhalt G. Differences and similarities among expert opinions on the diagnosis and treatment of pemphigus vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;49(6):1059–1062. PubMed
Venugopal S, Murrell D. Diagnosis and clinical features of pemphigus vulgaris. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2012; 32(2):233–243. PubMed
Joly P, Bernard P, Bedane C, Prost C, Ingen-Housz-Oro S. Pemphigus. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment. Centres de reference des maladies bulleuses auto-immunes. Societe Francaise de Dermatologie. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2011;138:252–258. PubMed
Committee for Guidelines for the Management of Pemphigus Disease, Amagai M, Tanikawa A, Shimizu T, et al. Japanese guidelines for the management of pemphigus. J Dermatol. 2014;41:471–486. PubMed
Eming R, Sticherling M, Hofmann SC, et al. S2k guidelines for the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris/foliaceus and bullous pemphigoid. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2015;13:833–844. PubMed
Harman KE, Albert S, Black MM. Guidelines for the management of pemphigus vulgaris. Br J Dermatol. 2003; 149:926–937. PubMed
Hertl M, Jedlickova H, Karpati S, et al. Pemphigus. S2 guideline for diagnosis and treatment–guided by the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) in cooperation with the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014;29(3): 405–414. PubMed
Hsu C, Sandford B. The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2007;12(4). Available at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/pare/vol12/iss1/10. Accessed February 15, 2016.
Shimizu T, Takebayashi T, Sato Y, et al. Grading criteria for disease severity by pemphigus disease area index. J Dermatol. 2014;2014(41):969–973. PubMed
International Pemphigus Study Group, Boulard C, Duvert Lehembre S, Picard-Dahan C, et al. Calculation of cut-off values based on the autoimmune bullous skin disorder intensity score (ABSIS) and pemphigus disease area index (PDAI) pemphigus scoring systems for defining moderate, significant, and extensive types of pemphigus. Br J Dermatol. 2016;175:142–149. PubMed
Joly P, Maho-Vaillant M, Prost-Squarcioni C, et al. First-line use of rituximab combined with short-term-prednisone versus corticosteroid alone in the treatment of patients with pemphigus: a prospective multicenter randomized trial. Lancet. 2017;389:2031–2040. PubMed
Murrell DF, Daniel BS, Joly P, et al. Definitions and outcome measures for bullous pemphigoid: recommendations by an international panel of experts. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;66(3): 479–485. PubMed PMC