Anthelmintic resistance in goat herds-In vivo versus in vitro detection methods
Language English Country Netherlands Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
29656993
DOI
10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.02.036
PII: S0304-4017(18)30086-4
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Anthelmintics, Benzimidazole, Detection method, Goats, Resistance,
- MeSH
- Anthelmintics pharmacology MeSH
- Benzimidazoles pharmacology MeSH
- Haemonchus anatomy & histology drug effects growth & development MeSH
- Goats parasitology MeSH
- Larva anatomy & histology drug effects growth & development MeSH
- Drug Resistance * MeSH
- Ostertagia anatomy & histology drug effects growth & development MeSH
- In Vitro Techniques MeSH
- Trichostrongylus anatomy & histology drug effects growth & development MeSH
- Dose-Response Relationship, Drug MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Geographicals
- Slovakia MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Anthelmintics MeSH
- benzimidazole MeSH Browser
- Benzimidazoles MeSH
Anthelmintic resistance (AR) is a serious threat to animal health and has a major economic impact worldwide due to production and financial losses. The aim of this study was to determine the occurrence of AR on 30 goat farms in Slovakia during the pasturing seasons and to compare three widely used in vitro and in vivo methods for detecting AR in field conditions. A three-year survey was conducted during the pasturing seasons of 2014-2016. Goats on each farm were split into treated and control groups and were treated by recommended (5 mg/kg body weight) and double doses (10 mg/kg b.w.) of albendazole. Comparisons between percent reduction in a faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT) and an egg hatch test (EHT) and the presence of L3 larvae in a larval development test (LDT) using resistant concentrations of benzimidazole (BZ) were monitored after treatment. The FECRT indicated percent reductions of 69.2-86.2% for the single dose and of 36.3-45.4% for the double dose. The EHT indicated that all farms had BZ-resistant nematodes. Low (<15% hatching) and high (>15% hatching) levels of resistance were detected on 13 and 17 farms, respectively. The LDT failed to detect resistant larvae on seven farms but detected low and high levels of resistance on seven and 14 farms, respectively. The data indicate a moderate correlation between in vitro and in vivo tests for detecting BZ resistance among the 30 goat farms. The hatching detected by the EHT and the presence of L3 larvae by the LDT at resistant BZ concentrations provided reasonable identification of low levels of resistance in the parasite populations, but the use of a double dose for a treatment may underestimate the real occurrence of low levels of resistant parasites on goat farms.
References provided by Crossref.org
Resistance of strongylid nematodes to anthelmintic drugs and driving factors at Czech goat farms