The heterologous expression potential of an acid-tolerant Talaromyces pinophilus β-glucosidase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
Grant support
88180
National Research Foundation (ZA)
PubMed
29797223
DOI
10.1007/s12223-018-0613-4
PII: 10.1007/s12223-018-0613-4
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Acid tolerant, Bioethanol, Consolidated bioprocessing, Heterologous expression, Talaromyces pinophilus, β-glucosidase,
- MeSH
- Ethanol metabolism MeSH
- Gene Expression * MeSH
- Phenotype MeSH
- Fermentation MeSH
- Genotype MeSH
- Glucosylceramidase genetics metabolism MeSH
- Cloning, Molecular MeSH
- Recombinant Proteins genetics metabolism MeSH
- Saccharomyces cerevisiae genetics metabolism MeSH
- Talaromyces enzymology genetics MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Ethanol MeSH
- Glucosylceramidase MeSH
- Recombinant Proteins MeSH
A filamentous fungus displaying high cellulase activity was isolated from a compost heap with triticale (a wheat-rye hybrid) as the main constituent. It was preliminarily identified as a Talaromyces pinophilus species. A 2577 base pair β-glucosidase gene was cloned from complementary DNA and heterologously expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The recombinant β-glucosidase production profile was assessed and compared to that of the Saccharomycopsis fibuligera β-glucosidase which served as a benchmark. The enzyme was also characterised in terms of pH and temperature tolerance as well as response to inhibitors. Maximal extracellular β-glucosidase activity of 0.56 nkat/mg total protein was measured using p-nitrophenyl-β-D-glucopyranoside as substrate. The recombinant protein displayed a pH optimum of 4.0, and good thermostability as 70% of maximal enzyme activity was retained after 1 h at 60 °C. Activity of the recombinant β-glucosidase was adversely affected by the presence of glucose and ethanol at higher concentrations while xylose had no effect. The expression of the T. pinophilus β-glucosidase did not reach the same titres as for the benchmark; however, in the context of constructing a yeast strain for bioethanol production in a consolidated bioprocess, the enzyme may still show good potential.
See more in PubMed
PeerJ. 2013 Feb 26;1:e46 PubMed
Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680-5 PubMed
Bioengineered. 2013 Jul-Aug;4(4):207-11 PubMed
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2004 Dec 30;88(7):797-824 PubMed
Int J Biochem. 1982;14(6):435-43 PubMed
Bioresour Technol. 2017 Dec;245(Pt B):1352-1361 PubMed
PLoS One. 2009 Sep 14;4(9):e7002 PubMed
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001 Jun;55(6):712-20 PubMed
J Biotechnol. 2005 Nov 21;120(3):284-95 PubMed
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012 Oct;39(10):1445-52 PubMed
J Gen Microbiol. 1989 Nov;135(11):2791-8 PubMed
Microbiology. 2012 Jan;158(Pt 1):58-68 PubMed
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2004 Nov 15;240(2):137-43 PubMed
Bioresour Technol. 2012 Jun;114:555-60 PubMed
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 21;11(12):e0167932 PubMed
J Bacteriol. 1979 Sep;139(3):761-9 PubMed
J Biotechnol. 2017 Mar 10;245:1-8 PubMed
Stud Mycol. 2014 Jun;78:175-341 PubMed
Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 15;6:24550 PubMed
Biotechnol Lett. 2008 Aug;30(8):1469-75 PubMed
J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403-10 PubMed
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012 Apr;94(2):413-23 PubMed
Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2004 Spring;113-116:1115-26 PubMed
Bioresour Technol. 2018 Apr;254:107-114 PubMed
Metab Eng. 2007 Jan;9(1):87-94 PubMed
Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2008 May;149(2):169-82 PubMed
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2007 May;270(1):162-70 PubMed
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014 Apr 12;7:60 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988 Dec;54(12):3147-55 PubMed
Bioresour Technol. 2012 May;112:345-9 PubMed
Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2002;22(4):375-407 PubMed
J Biol Chem. 1951 Nov;193(1):265-75 PubMed
Enzyme Microb Technol. 2013 Mar 5;52(3):163-9 PubMed
Bioresour Technol. 2012 Nov;123:15-22 PubMed
J Agric Food Chem. 2003 Feb 26;51(5):1453-9 PubMed
Anal Biochem. 1991 May 15;195(1):45-50 PubMed
Nat Protoc. 2007;2(1):35-7 PubMed
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2009 Oct 01;2(1):24 PubMed
Science. 2010 Oct 1;330(6000):84-6 PubMed
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2002 Sep;66(3):506-77, table of contents PubMed
Front Microbiol. 2016 Mar 03;7:241 PubMed