Influence of Streptococcus mitis and Streptococcus sanguinis on virulence of Candida albicans: in vitro and in vivo studies

. 2019 Mar ; 64 (2) : 215-222. [epub] 20180919

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid30232727
Odkazy

PubMed 30232727
DOI 10.1007/s12223-018-0645-9
PII: 10.1007/s12223-018-0645-9
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

The aim was to evaluate in vitro possible interactions, gene expression, and biofilm formation in species of Candida albicans, Streptococcus mitis, and Streptococcus sanguinis and their in vivo pathogenicity. The in vitro analysis evaluated the effects of S. mitis and S. sanguinis on C. albicans's biofilm formation by CFU count, filamentation capacity, and adhesion (ALS1, ALS3, HWP1) and transcriptional regulatory gene (BCR1, CPH1, EFG1) expression. In vivo studies evaluated the pathogenicity of the interaction of the microorganisms on Galleria mellonella, with analyses of the CFU per milliliter count and filamentation. In vitro results indicated that there was an observed decrease in CFU (79.4-71.5%) in multi-species biofilms. The interaction with S. mitis inhibited filamentation, which seems to increase its virulence factor with over-expression of genes ALS1, ALS3, and HWP1 as well the interaction with S. sanguinis as ALS3 and HWP1. S. mitis upregulated BRC1, CPH1, and EFG1. The histological images of in vivo study indicate an increase in the filamentation of C. albicans when in interaction with the other species. It was concluded that S. mitis interaction suggests increased virulence factors of C. albicans, with periods of lower virulence and proto-cooperation in the interaction with S. sanguinis.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Science. 1999 Mar 5;283(5407):1535-8 PubMed

J Med Microbiol. 1999 Jul;48(7):671-9 PubMed

Microbiology. 2000 Jan;146 ( Pt 1):41-8 PubMed

Methods. 2001 Dec;25(4):402-8 PubMed

Infect Immun. 2005 Jul;73(7):3833-41 PubMed

Trends Microbiol. 2005 Dec;13(12):589-95 PubMed

Arch Oral Biol. 2006 Aug;51(8):672-80 PubMed

Curr Opin Microbiol. 2006 Aug;9(4):346-51 PubMed

BMC Mol Biol. 2006 Aug 04;7:25 PubMed

Infect Immun. 2007 May;75(5):2126-35 PubMed

Infect Immun. 2009 Sep;77(9):3696-704 PubMed

FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2009 Oct;299(1):1-8 PubMed

PLoS Pathog. 2010 Jan 08;6(1):e1000713 PubMed

Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010 May;8(5):340-9 PubMed

BMC Microbiol. 2010 Apr 16;10:114 PubMed

Mol Microbiol. 2010 Dec;78(6):1379-92 PubMed

PLoS One. 2011 Jan 25;6(1):e16218 PubMed

PLoS Pathog. 2011 Mar;7(3):e1002012 PubMed

Mol Microbiol. 2011 Jul;81(2):305-14 PubMed

Infect Immun. 2012 Feb;80(2):620-32 PubMed

Mol Oral Microbiol. 2012 Jun;27(3):182-201 PubMed

Mol Oral Microbiol. 2013 Feb;28(1):54-69 PubMed

PLoS Genet. 2012;8(12):e1003118 PubMed

Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013 Sep;1832(9):1378-83 PubMed

Cell Microbiol. 2014 Feb;16(2):214-31 PubMed

J Oral Microbiol. 2014 Jan 29;6:null PubMed

Biofouling. 2015;31(1):27-38 PubMed

Virulence. 2015;6(1):29-39 PubMed

Mol Oral Microbiol. 2015 Aug;30(4):307-22 PubMed

PLoS One. 2015 Jul 06;10(7):e0131700 PubMed

Arch Oral Biol. 2016 Apr;64:92-101 PubMed

PLoS One. 2016 Mar 02;11(3):e0150457 PubMed

J Appl Microbiol. 2017 Jan;122(1):201-211 PubMed

Braz Dent J. 2017 Nov-Dec;28(6):669-674 PubMed

Pathog Dis. 2018 Mar 1;76(2): PubMed

Microb Pathog. 2018 Oct;123:361-367 PubMed

Science. 1994 Dec 9;266(5191):1723-6 PubMed

J Med Microbiol. 1998 Mar;47(3):253-6 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...