• This record comes from PubMed

Differences in Loading and Morphological Structure of the Take-off and Non-take-off Limb in Athletics Jumping Events

. 2018 Dec ; 65 () : 99-109. [epub] 20181231

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Language English Country Poland Media electronic-ecollection

Document type Journal Article

The objective of the study was to assess differences between the take-off and non-take-off limbs of athletes in track-and-field jumping events based on a segmental analysis of body composition as well as kinetic analysis. The research included 19 participants (10 males, 9 females) with an average age of 18.1 ± 2.8 years. We measured body height, body mass, body composition (body fat, fat free mass, bone mineral content and bone density) and segmental distribution of these variables. To assess strength of the lower limbs, we performed reaction force analysis during take-off and run symmetry. The difference in the representation of soft tissues between the take-off and non-take-off limbs was not significant; the differences were 0.06%, 0 kg in body fat and 0.01 kg in fat free mass. The differences in the values of bone matter were significant. The bone mineral content was 0.05 kg higher in the take-off limb (p < 0.001), and bone density was 0.07 g/cm2 higher (p < 0.001); the practical significance of the difference was intermediate (d = 0.5). Kinetic analysis showed that athletes exerted greater force on the pad with the take-off limb than the non-take-off limb when taking off while using arms in the first peak of the vertical force. The difference determined in this type of take-off was statistically significant (p < 0.05); the practical significance of the difference was medium (d = 0.7). The difference in the second peak of the vertical reaction force in the take-off arm was not statistically significant. The differences were reflected in the different bone matter compositions.

See more in PubMed

Ae M, Nagahara R, Ohshima Y, Koyama H, Takamoto M, Shibayama K. Biomechanical analysis of top three male high jumpers at the 2007 World Championships in Athletics. New Studies in Athletics. 2008;23:45–52.

Arazi H, Eghbali E, Saeedi T, Moghada R. The Relationship of Physical Activity and Anthropometric and Physiological Characteristics to Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Women. J Clin Densitom. 2016;19:382–388. PubMed

Aragon-Vargas LF, Gross MM. Kinesiological factors in vertical jump performance: differences among individuals. J Appl Biomech. 1997;13:24–44.

Bateman T. High jump styles within the Flop technique. Coach. 2004;22:943–46.

Braun SI, Kim Y, Jetton AE, Kang M, Morgan DW. Prediction of bone mineral density and content from measures of physical activity and sedentary behavior in younger and older females. Preventive Medicine Reports. 2015;2:300–305. PubMed PMC

Bridgett L, Linthorne N. Changes in long jump take-off technique with increasingrun-up speed. J Sport Sci. 2006;24:889–897. PubMed

Chastin SF, Mandrichenko O, Helbostadt JL, Skelton DA. Associations between objectively-measured sedentary behaviour and physical activity with bone mineral density in adults and older adults, the NHANES study. Bone. 2014;64:254–262. PubMed

Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988. pp. 273–288.

Heinonen A, Sievänen H, Kyröläinen H, Perttunen J, Kannus P. Mineral mass, size, and estimated mechanical strength of triple jumpers' lower limb. Bone. 2001;29:279–285. PubMed

Hopkins WG. Measures of Reliability in Sports Medicine and Science. Sports Med. 2000;30:1–15. PubMed

Ilianca I, Avramescu T, Shaao M, Rosulescu E, Zavaleanu M. The Role Of High – Impact Exercise in Improve Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Women With Osteopenia or Osteoporosis. Journal of Physical Educational & Sport. 2010;27:110–116.

Kato T, Tereshima T, Yamashita T, Hatanaka Y, Honda A, Umemura Y. Effect of low-repetition jump training on bone mineral density in young women. J App Physiol. 2006;100:839–843. PubMed

Kutáč P.. The effect of the measuring mode on the results of body composition using bioelectrical impedance method. Česká Antropologie. 2011;61:28–32.

Kutáč P.. Development of Somatic Parameters of Ice Hockey Players. Česká antropologie. 2012;62:9–14.

Kutáč P, Sigmund M.. A Comparison of Somatic Variables of Elite Ice Hockey Players from the Czech ELH and Russian KHL. J Hum Kinet. 2015;45:189–197. PubMed PMC

Lees A, Graham-Smith P, Fowler N. A biomechanical analysis of the last stride, touch-down and take-off characteristics of the men's long jump. J Appl Biomech. 1994;10:61–78.

Letzelter S. The importance of horizontal and vertical take-off velocity for elite female long jumpers. New Studies in Athletics. 2011;26:73–84.

McEwen F.. High Jump: Teaching the Fosbury Flop. Modern Athlete & Coach. 2007;45:10–14.

Muraki Y, Yokozawa T, Ae M, Koyama H. Athletics: Mechanical properties of the take-off leg as a support mechanism in the long jump. Sports Biomechanics. 2005;4:1–15. PubMed

Nunn-Cearns G.. Long Jump. Modern Athlete & Coach. 2011;49:12–14.

Panoutsakopoulos V, Kollias IA. 3D Biomechanical Analysis of Women's High Jump Technique. New Studies in Athletics. 2012;27:31–44.

Ritzdorf W. Approaches to technique and technical training in the high jump. New Studies in Athletics. 2009;24:31–34.

Schiffer J. The high jump. New Studies in Athletics. 2009;34:9–22.

Schinkel-Ivy A, Burkhart TA, Andrews DM. Differences in distal lower extremity tissue masses and mass ratios exist in athletes of sports involving repetitive impacts. J Sports Sci. 2014;32:533–41. PubMed

Shepherd J. Long Jump Technique. Track Coach. 2013;202:6437–6440.

Van Gheluwe B, Roosen P, Desloovere K. Rear foot kinematics during initial takeoff of elite high jumpers: Estimation of spatial position and orientation of subtalar axis. Journal of Biomechanics. 2003;19:13–27.

Zhao BJ. Analysis on the characteristics of the age and technique in the world men long jump. Zhejiang Sports Science. 2000;22:27–30.

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...