Impact of Farnesol as a Modulator of Efflux Pumps in a Fluconazole-Resistant Strain of Candida albicans
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
30785845
DOI
10.1089/mdr.2017.0332
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- efflux transporters, farnesol, fluconazole, resistance,
- MeSH
- ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters metabolism MeSH
- Antifungal Agents pharmacology MeSH
- Biological Transport drug effects MeSH
- Candida albicans drug effects metabolism MeSH
- Farnesol pharmacology MeSH
- Fluconazole pharmacology MeSH
- Drug Resistance, Fungal drug effects MeSH
- Fungal Proteins metabolism MeSH
- Membrane Transport Proteins metabolism MeSH
- Microbial Sensitivity Tests methods MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Names of Substances
- ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters MeSH
- Antifungal Agents MeSH
- Farnesol MeSH
- Fluconazole MeSH
- Fungal Proteins MeSH
- Membrane Transport Proteins MeSH
Aim: This work studied the impact of the quorum-sensing molecule, farnesol (FAR), on fluconazole (FLC)-resistant Candida albicans isolate CY 1123 compared with the susceptible standard strain C. albicans SC5314. The genes encoding efflux pumps belonging to the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) and major facilitator superfamilies, together with overexpression or point mutation of the ERG11 gene, are the main resistance mechanisms to azole antifungal drugs. Results: The upregulation of genes coding for CDR1, CDR2, and MDR1 were confirmed by qPCR with respect to the housekeeping gene ACT1 in the resistant strain. The contribution of the ERG11 gene was also observed. Markedly, increased pump activity (Cdr1 and/or Cdr2) in the CY 1123 strain was confirmed using diS-C3(3) assay. However, the addition of FAR to the yeasts diminished the difference in staining levels between the SC5314 and CY 1123 strains, demonstrating the concentration-dependent character that could be caused by an effective modulation of Cdr pumps. FAR (60 and 100 μM) was also able to decrease the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC50), denoting the inhibition of planktonic cells by 50%, from 8 to 4 μg/mL of FLC when the resistant strain CY 1123 was not cultivated with FLC. However, when it was exposed to 64 μg/mL of FLC, the MIC50 shifted from 64 to 8 μg/mL. Conclusion: Besides the many other effects of FAR on eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells, it also affects ABC efflux transporters, resulting in changes in resistance to azoles in C. albicans isolates. However, this effect is dependent on FAR concentrations.
References provided by Crossref.org