Cross-efficiency evaluation in the presence of flexible measures with an application to healthcare systems
Language English Country Netherlands Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
Grant support
17-23495S
Grantov? Agentura ?esk? Republiky (CZ)
2018
Universidad de los Andes
PubMed
30825047
DOI
10.1007/s10729-019-09478-0
PII: 10.1007/s10729-019-09478-0
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Clustering, Cross-efficiency, Data envelopment analysis, Data science, Flexible measure, Healthcare,
- MeSH
- Resource Allocation methods MeSH
- Global Health MeSH
- Efficiency, Organizational * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Delivery of Health Care * methods organization & administration MeSH
- Decision Making MeSH
- Cluster Analysis MeSH
- Models, Statistical * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
In recent years, most countries around the world have struggled with the consequences of budget cuts in health expenditure, obliging them to utilize their resources efficiently. In this context, performance evaluation facilitates the decision-making process in improving the efficiency of the healthcare system. However, the performance evaluation of many sectors, including the healthcare systems, is, on the one hand, a challenging issue and on the other hand a useful tool for decision- making with the aim of optimizing the use of resources. This study proposes a new methodology comprising two well-known analytical approaches: (i) data envelopment analysis (DEA) to measure the efficiencies and (ii) data science to complement the DEA model in providing insightful recommendations for strategic decision making on productivity enhancement. The suggested method is a first attempt to combine two DEA extensions: flexible measure and cross-efficiency. We develop a pair of benevolent and aggressive scenarios aiming at evaluating cross-efficiency in the presence of flexible measures. Next, we perform data mining cluster analysis to create groups of homogeneous countries. Organizing the data in similar groups facilitates identifying a set of benchmarks that perform similarly in terms of operating conditions. Comparing the benchmark set with poorly performing countries we can obtain attainable goals for performance enhancement which will assist policymakers to strategically act upon it. A case study of healthcare systems in 120 countries is taken as an example to illustrate the potential application of our new method.
See more in PubMed
Health Serv Manage Res. 1995 May;8(2):73-85 PubMed
Health Econ. 2003 Jun;12(6):493-504 PubMed
Health Policy. 2004 Jul;69(1):55-72 PubMed
Eur J Health Econ. 2004 Oct;5(3):216-26 PubMed
Eur J Health Econ. 2005 Sep;6(3):215-22 PubMed
Health Econ. 2008 Oct;17(10):1107-28 PubMed
Health Care Manag Sci. 2008 Dec;11(4):373-81 PubMed
Eur J Health Econ. 2011 Dec;12(6):509-19 PubMed
J Med Syst. 2011 Oct;35(5):1001-14 PubMed
Eur J Health Econ. 2013 Apr;14(2):253-65 PubMed
Health Policy. 2012 Oct;107(2-3):258-68 PubMed
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Dec;75(11):1954-63 PubMed
Health Policy. 2013 Sep;112(1-2):70-9 PubMed
Health Policy. 2013 Aug;111(3):290-300 PubMed
Health Policy. 2013 Sep;112(1-2):88-99 PubMed
Health Care Manag Sci. 2019 Jun;22(2):197-214 PubMed
Health Care Manag Sci. 2018 Mar 29;:null PubMed
Med Care. 1984 Oct;22(10):922-38 PubMed
Health Serv Res. 1983 Summer;18(2 Pt 1):183-208 PubMed
Community Ment Health J. 1997 Dec;33(6):487-99 PubMed