• This record comes from PubMed

Cross-efficiency evaluation in the presence of flexible measures with an application to healthcare systems

. 2019 Sep ; 22 (3) : 512-533. [epub] 20190301

Language English Country Netherlands Media print-electronic

Document type Journal Article

Grant support
17-23495S Grantov? Agentura ?esk? Republiky (CZ)
2018 Universidad de los Andes

Links

PubMed 30825047
DOI 10.1007/s10729-019-09478-0
PII: 10.1007/s10729-019-09478-0
Knihovny.cz E-resources

In recent years, most countries around the world have struggled with the consequences of budget cuts in health expenditure, obliging them to utilize their resources efficiently. In this context, performance evaluation facilitates the decision-making process in improving the efficiency of the healthcare system. However, the performance evaluation of many sectors, including the healthcare systems, is, on the one hand, a challenging issue and on the other hand a useful tool for decision- making with the aim of optimizing the use of resources. This study proposes a new methodology comprising two well-known analytical approaches: (i) data envelopment analysis (DEA) to measure the efficiencies and (ii) data science to complement the DEA model in providing insightful recommendations for strategic decision making on productivity enhancement. The suggested method is a first attempt to combine two DEA extensions: flexible measure and cross-efficiency. We develop a pair of benevolent and aggressive scenarios aiming at evaluating cross-efficiency in the presence of flexible measures. Next, we perform data mining cluster analysis to create groups of homogeneous countries. Organizing the data in similar groups facilitates identifying a set of benchmarks that perform similarly in terms of operating conditions. Comparing the benchmark set with poorly performing countries we can obtain attainable goals for performance enhancement which will assist policymakers to strategically act upon it. A case study of healthcare systems in 120 countries is taken as an example to illustrate the potential application of our new method.

See more in PubMed

Health Serv Manage Res. 1995 May;8(2):73-85 PubMed

Health Econ. 2003 Jun;12(6):493-504 PubMed

Health Policy. 2004 Jul;69(1):55-72 PubMed

Eur J Health Econ. 2004 Oct;5(3):216-26 PubMed

Eur J Health Econ. 2005 Sep;6(3):215-22 PubMed

Health Econ. 2008 Oct;17(10):1107-28 PubMed

Health Care Manag Sci. 2008 Dec;11(4):373-81 PubMed

Eur J Health Econ. 2011 Dec;12(6):509-19 PubMed

J Med Syst. 2011 Oct;35(5):1001-14 PubMed

Eur J Health Econ. 2013 Apr;14(2):253-65 PubMed

Health Policy. 2012 Oct;107(2-3):258-68 PubMed

Soc Sci Med. 2012 Dec;75(11):1954-63 PubMed

Health Policy. 2013 Sep;112(1-2):70-9 PubMed

Health Policy. 2013 Aug;111(3):290-300 PubMed

Health Policy. 2013 Sep;112(1-2):88-99 PubMed

Health Care Manag Sci. 2019 Jun;22(2):197-214 PubMed

Health Care Manag Sci. 2018 Mar 29;:null PubMed

Med Care. 1984 Oct;22(10):922-38 PubMed

Health Serv Res. 1983 Summer;18(2 Pt 1):183-208 PubMed

Community Ment Health J. 1997 Dec;33(6):487-99 PubMed

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...