Searching for the "Active Ingredients" in Physical Rehabilitation Programs Across Europe, Necessary to Improve Mobility in People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Multicenter Study
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- Keywords
- mobility, multiple sclerosis, physical rehabilitation, treatment elements, walking,
- MeSH
- Walking * MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Disability Evaluation MeSH
- Multiple Sclerosis rehabilitation MeSH
- Severity of Illness Index MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Exercise Test MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Geographicals
- Europe MeSH
BACKGROUND: Physical rehabilitation programs can lead to improvements in mobility in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). OBJECTIVE: To identify which rehabilitation program elements are employed in real life and how they might affect mobility improvement in PwMS. METHODS: Participants were divided into improved and nonimproved mobility groups based on changes observed in the Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12 following multimodal physical rehabilitation programs. Analyses were performed at group and subgroup (mild and moderate-severe disability) levels. Rehabilitation program elements included setting, number of weeks, number of sessions, total duration, therapy format (individual, group, autonomous), therapy goals, and therapeutic approaches. RESULTS: The study comprised 279 PwMS from 17 European centers. PwMS in the improved group received more sessions of individual therapy in both subgroups. In the mildly disabled group, 60.9% of the improved received resistance training, whereas, 68.5% of the nonimproved received self-stretching. In the moderately-severely disabled group, 31.4% of the improved, received aerobic training, while 50.4% of the nonimproved received passive mobilization/stretching. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that our findings are an important step in opening the black-box of physical rehabilitation, imparting guidance, and assisting future research in defining characteristics of effective physical rehabilitation.
3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark
Cemcat Neurorehabilitation Unit Vall Hebron University Hospital Barcelona Spain
Centre Neurologique et de Readaptation Fonctionelle Fraiture en Condroz Belgium
Eugenia Epalza Rehabilitation Center Bilbao Spain
Faculty of Health and Human Sciences Plymouth University Devon UK
Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences Hasselt University Diepenbeek Belgium
Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences Hasselt University Diepenbeek Belgium
Masku Neurological Rehabilitation Center Masku Finland
Multiple Sclerosis Center Hakadal AS Norway
Multiple Sclerosis Hospital Haslev Denmark
Multiple Sclerosis Hospital Ry Denmark
National Multiple Sclerosis Center Melsbroek Belgium
Norwegian Multiple Sclerosis Competence Centre Haukeland University Hospital Bergen Norway
Open Rehabilitation Center Aksoni Helsinki Finland
Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Dorset UK
Rehabilitation and Multiple Sclerosis Center Overpelt Belgium
Sackler Faculty of Medicine and Sagol School of Neurosciences Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel
Sheba Multiple Sclerosis Center Tel Hashomer Israel
University Medical Center Ljubljana Slovenia
University of Tromsø the Arctic University of Norway Nordland Hospital Trust Bodø Norway
References provided by Crossref.org
Content and Delivery of Physical Therapy in Multiple Sclerosis across Europe: A Survey