Prenatal exposure to sex hormones exerts organizational effects on the brain which have observable behavioural correlates in adult life. There are reasons to expect that social behaviours-fundamental for the evolutionary success of humans-might be related to biological factors such as prenatal sex hormone exposure. Nevertheless, the existing literature is inconclusive as to whether and how prenatal exposure to testosterone and oestrogen, proxied by the second-to-fourth digit ratio (2D : 4D), may predict non-selfish behaviour. Here, we investigate this question using economic experiments with real monetary stakes and analyse five different dimensions of social behaviour in a comparatively large sample of Caucasian participants (n = 560). For both males and females, our results show no robust association between right- or left-hand 2D : 4D and generosity, bargaining or trust-related behaviours. Moreover, no differences in behaviour were found according to sex. We conclude that there is no direct correlation between 2D : 4D and these social behaviours.

CERGE EI Prague Czech Republic

Department of Economics LoyolaBehLAB Universidad Loyola Andalucía Cordoba Andalucia 14004 Spain

Department of Economics Universidad del País Vasco Bilbao País Vasco Spain

Department of Quantitative Methods Universidad de Granada Granada 18071 Spain

Department of Social Anthropology Universidad de Granada Granada Granada 18071 Spain

See more in PubMed

Fehr E, Fischbacher U. 2003. The nature of human altruism. Nature 425, 785–791. (10.1038/nature02043) PubMed DOI

Ebstein RP, Israel S, Chew SH, Zhong S, Knafo A. 2010. Genetics of human social behavior. Neuron 65, 831–844. (10.1016/j.neuron.2010.02.020) PubMed DOI

Corgnet B, Espín AM, Hernán-González R, Kujal P, Rassenti S. 2016. To trust, or not to trust: cognitive reflection in trust games. J. Behav. Exp. Econ. 64, 20–27. (10.1016/j.socec.2015.09.008) DOI

Espín AM, Exadaktylos F, Neyse L. 2016. Heterogeneous motives in the trust game: a tale of two roles. Front. Psychol. 7, 728 (10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00728) PubMed DOI PMC

Henrich J, et al. 2005. Economic man in cross-cultural perspective: behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. J. Behav. Brain Sci. 28, 795–815. (10.1017/S0140525X05000142) PubMed DOI

Henrich J, et al. 2010. Markets, religion, community size, and the evolution of fairness and punishment. Science 327, 1480–1484. (10.1126/science.1182238) PubMed DOI

Herrmann B, Thöni C, Gächter S. 2008. Antisocial punishment across societies. Science 319, 1362–1367. (10.1126/science.1153808) PubMed DOI

Wallace B, Cesarini D, Lichtenstein P, Johannesson M. 2007. Heritability of ultimatum game responder behavior. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 15 631–15 634. (10.1073/pnas.0706642104) PubMed DOI PMC

Cesarini D, Dawes CT, Fowler JH, Johannesson M, Lichtenstein P, Wallace B. 2008. Heritability of cooperative behavior in the trust game. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 3721–3726. (10.1073/pnas.0710069105) PubMed DOI PMC

Wingfield JC, Maney DL, Breuner CW, Jacobs JD, Lynn S, Ramenofsky M, Richardson RD. 1998. Ecological bases of hormone–behavior interactions: the ‘emergency life history stage’. Am. Zool. 38, 191–206. (10.1093/icb/38.1.191) DOI

Repetti RL, Taylor SE, Seeman TE. 2002. Risky families: family social environments and the mental and physical health of offspring. Psychol. Bull. 128, 330–366. (10.1037/0033-2909.128.2.330) PubMed DOI

Fries ABW, Ziegler TE, Kurian JR, Jacoris S, Pollak SD. 2005. Early experience in humans is associated with changes in neuropeptides critical for regulating social behavior. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 17 237–17 240. (10.1073/pnas.0504767102) PubMed DOI PMC

Knickmeyer R, Baron-Cohen S, Raggatt P, Taylor K. 2005. Foetal testosterone, social relationships, and restricted interests in children. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 46, 198–210. (10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00349.x) PubMed DOI

Auyeung B, Baron-Cohen S, Ashwin E, Knickmeyer R, Taylor K, Hackett G, Hines M. 2009. Fetal testosterone predicts sexually differentiated childhood behavior in girls and in boys. Psychol. Sci. 20, 144–148. (10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02279.x) PubMed DOI PMC

Berenbaum SA, Beltz AM. 2011. Sexual differentiation of human behavior: effects of prenatal and pubertal organizational hormones. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 32, 183–200. (10.1016/j.yfrne.2011.03.001) PubMed DOI

Baron-Cohen S, Knickmeyer RC, Belmonte MK. 2005. Sex differences in the brain: implications for explaining autism. Science 310, 819–823. (10.1126/science.1115455) PubMed DOI

Cohen-Bendahan CC, Van de Beek C, Berenbaum SA. 2005. Prenatal sex hormone effects on child and adult sex-typed behavior: methods and findings. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 29, 353–384. (10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.11.004) PubMed DOI

Davis EP, Sandman CA. 2010. The timing of prenatal exposure to maternal cortisol and psychosocial stress is associated with human infant cognitive development. Child Dev. 81, 131–148. (10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01385.x) PubMed DOI PMC

Lombardo MV, Ashwin E, Auyeung B, Chakrabarti B, Lai MC, Taylor K, Hackett G, Bullmore ET, Baron-Cohen S. 2012. Fetal programming effects of testosterone on the reward system and behavioral approach tendencies in humans. Biol. Psychiatry 72, 839–847. (10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.05.027) PubMed DOI PMC

Harris JA, Vernon PA, Boomsma DI. 1998. The heritability of testosterone: a study of Dutch adolescent twins and their parents. Behav. Genet. 28, 165–171. (10.1023/A:1021466929053) PubMed DOI

Bartels M, Van den Berg SM, Sluyter F, Boomsma DI, de Geus EJC. 2003. Heritability of cortisol levels: review and simultaneous analysis of twin studies. Psychoneuroendocrinology 28, 121–137. (10.1016/S0306-4530(02)00003-3) PubMed DOI

Burnham TC. 2007. High-testosterone men reject low ultimatum game offers. Proc. R. Soc. B 274, 2327–2330. (10.1098/rspb.2007.0546) PubMed DOI PMC

Zak PJ, Kurzban R, Ahmadi S, Swerdloff RS, Park J, Efremidze L, Redwine K, Morgan K, Matzner W.. 2009. Testosterone administration decreases generosity in the ultimatum game. PLoS ONE 4, e8330 (10.1371/journal.pone.0008330) PubMed DOI PMC

Zethraeus N, Kocoska-Maras L, Ellingsen T, Von Schoultz BO, Hirschberg AL, Johannesson M. 2009. A randomized trial of the effect of estrogen and testosterone on economic behavior. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 6535–6538. (10.1073/pnas.0812757106) PubMed DOI PMC

Bos PA, Terburg D, Van Honk J. 2010. Testosterone decreases trust in socially naive humans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 9991–9995. (10.1073/pnas.0911700107) PubMed DOI PMC

Eisenegger C, Haushofer J, Fehr E. 2011. The role of testosterone in social interaction. Trends Cogn. Sci. 15, 263–271. (10.1016/j.tics.2011.04.008) PubMed DOI

Eisenegger C, Naef M, Snozzi R, Heinrichs M, Fehr E. 2010. Prejudice and truth about the effect of testosterone on human bargaining behaviour. Nature 463, 356–359. (10.1038/nature08711) PubMed DOI

Van Honk J, Montoya ER, Bos PA, Van Vugt M, Terburg D. 2012. New evidence on testosterone and cooperation. Nature 485, E4 (10.1038/nature11136) PubMed DOI

Lutchmaya S, Baron-Cohen S, Raggatt P, Knickmeyer R, Manning JT. 2004. 2nd to 4th digit ratios, fetal testosterone and estradiol. Early Hum. Dev. 77, 23–28. (10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2003.12.002) PubMed DOI

Talarovičová A, Kršková L, Blažeková J. 2009. Testosterone enhancement during pregnancy influences the 2D : 4D ratio and open field motor activity of rat siblings in adulthood. Horm. Behav. 55, 235–239. (10.1016/j.yhbeh.2008.10.010) PubMed DOI

Auger J, Le Denmat D, Berges R, Doridot L, Salmon B, Canivenc-Lavier MC, Eustache F. 2013. Environmental levels of oestrogenic and antiandrogenic compounds feminize digit ratios in male rats and their unexposed male progeny. Proc. R. Soc. B 280, 20131532 (10.1098/rspb.2013.1532) PubMed DOI PMC

Romano M, Rubolini D, Martinelli R, Alquati AB, Saino N. 2005. Experimental manipulation of yolk testosterone affects digit length ratios in the ring-necked pheasant (Phasianus colchicus). Horm. Behav. 48, 342–346. (10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.03.007) PubMed DOI

Richards G. 2017. What is the evidence for a link between digit ratio (2D : 4D) and direct measures of prenatal sex hormones? Early Hum. Dev. 113, 71–72. (10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2017.08.003) PubMed DOI

Richards G, Gomes MC, Ventura T. 2018. Testosterone measured from amniotic fluid and maternal plasma shows no significant association with directional asymmetry in newborn digit ratio (2D : 4D). J. Dev. Orig. Health Dis. 10, 362–367. (10.1017/s2040174418000752) PubMed DOI

Manning JT. 2002. Digit ratio: a pointer to fertility, behavior, and health. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Hönekopp J, Watson S. 2010. Meta-analysis of digit ratio 2D : 4D shows greater sex difference in the right hand. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 22, 619–630. (10.1002/ajhb.21054) PubMed DOI

Manning JT, Fink B. 2008. Digit ratio (2D : 4D), dominance, reproductive success, asymmetry, and sociosexuality in the BBC Internet Study. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 20, 451–461. (10.1002/ajhb.20767) PubMed DOI

Kovářík J, Brañas-Garza P, Davidson MW, Haim DA, Carcelli S, Fowler JH. 2017. Digit ratio (2D : 4D) and social integration: an effect of prenatal sex hormones. Netw. Sci. 5, 476–489. (10.1017/nws.2017.4) DOI

Guiso L, Rustichini A. 2018. What drives women out of management? The joint role of testosterone and culture. Eur. Econ. Rev. 109, 221–237. (10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.10.008) DOI

Cecchi F, Duchoslav J. 2018. The effect of prenatal stress on cooperation: evidence from violent conflict in Uganda. Eur. Econ. Rev. 101, 35–56. (10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.09.015) DOI

De Neys W, Hopfensitz A, Bonnefon JF. 2013. Low second-to-fourth digit ratio predicts indiscriminate social suspicion, not improved trustworthiness detection. Biol. Lett. 9, 20130037 (10.1098/rsbl.2013.0037) PubMed DOI PMC

Millet K, Dewitte S. 2006. Second to fourth digit ratio and cooperative behavior. Biol. Psychol. 71, 111–115. (10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.06.001) PubMed DOI

Millet K, Dewitte S. 2007. Digit ratio (2D : 4D) moderates the impact of an aggressive music video on aggression. Pers. Individ. Dif. 43, 289–294. (10.1016/j.paid.2006.11.024) DOI

Van den Bergh B, Dewitte S. 2006. Digit ratio (2D : 4D) moderates the impact of sexual cues on men's decisions in ultimatum games. Proc. R. Soc. B 273, 2091–2095. (10.1098/rspb.2006.3550) PubMed DOI PMC

Ronay R, Galinsky AD. 2011. Lextalionis: testosterone and the law of retaliation. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 47, 702–705. (10.1016/j.jesp.2010.11.009) DOI

Buser T. 2012. Digit ratios, the menstrual cycle and social preferences. Games Econ. Behav. 76, 457–470. (10.1016/j.geb.2012.07.006) DOI

Millet K, Dewitte S. 2009. The presence of aggression cues inverts the relation between digit ratio (2D : 4D) and prosocial behaviour in a dictator game. Br. J. Psychol. 100, 151–162. (10.1348/000712608X324359) PubMed DOI

Sanchez-Pages S, Turiegano E. 2010. Testosterone, facial symmetry and cooperation in the prisoners' dilemma. Physiol. Behav. 99, 355–361. (10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.11.013) PubMed DOI

Sanchez-Pages S, Turiegano E. 2013. Two studies on the interplay between social preferences and individual biological features. Behaviour 150, 713–735. (10.1163/1568539X-00003077) DOI

Brañas-Garza P, Kovářík J, Neyse L. 2013. Second-to-fourth digit ratio has a non-monotonic impact on altruism. PLoS ONE 8, e60419 (10.1371/journal.pone.0060419) PubMed DOI PMC

Galizzi MM, Nieboer J. 2015. Digit ratio (2D : 4D) and altruism: evidence from a large, multi-ethnic sample. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 9, 41 (10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00041) PubMed DOI PMC

Candelo N, Eckel C. 2018. The 2D : 4D ratio does not always correlate with economic behavior: a field experiment with African-Americans. Econ. Hum. Biol. 30, 172–181. (10.1016/j.ehb.2018.07.002) PubMed DOI

Parslow E, Ranehill E, Zethraeus N, Blomberg L, von Schoultz B, Lind A, Johannesson M, Dreber A. 2018. The digit ratio (2D : 4D) and economic preferences: no robust associations in a sample of 330 women. mimeo. PubMed PMC

Kaltwasser L, Mikac U, Buško V, Hildebrandt A. 2017. No robust association between static markers of testosterone and facets of socio-economic decision making. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 11, 250 (10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00250) PubMed DOI PMC

Brañas-Garza P, Capraro V, Rascon-Ramirez E. 2018. Gender differences in altruism on Mechanical Turk: expectations and actual behaviour. Econ. Lett. 170, 19–23. (10.1016/j.econlet.2018.05.022) DOI

Güth W, Schmittberger R, Schwarze B. 1982. An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 3, 367–388. (10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7) DOI

Bohnet I, Zeckhauser R. 2004. Trust, risk and betrayal. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 55, 467–484. (10.1016/j.jebo.2003.11.004) DOI

Buchan NR, Croson RT, Solnick S. 2008. Trust and gender: an examination of behavior and beliefs in the investment game. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 68, 466–476. (10.1016/j.jebo.2007.10.006) DOI

Li S, Qin X, Houser D. 2018. Revisiting gender differences in ultimatum bargaining: experimental evidence from the US and China. J. Econ. Sci. Assoc. 4, 180–190. (10.1007/s40881-018-0054-5) DOI

Solnick SJ. 2001. Gender differences in the ultimatum game. Econ. Inquiry 39, 189–200. (10.1111/j.1465-7295.2001.tb00060.x) DOI

Bosch-Domènech A, Brañas-Garza P, Espín AM. 2014. Can exposure to prenatal sex hormones (2D : 4D) predict cognitive reflection? Psychoneuroendocrinology 43, 1–10. (10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.01.023) PubMed DOI

Cueva C, Iturbe-Ormaetxe I, Mata-Pérez E, Ponti G, Sartarelli M, Yu H, Zhukova V. 2016. Cognitive (ir)reflection: new experimental evidence. J. Behav. Exp. Econ. 64, 81–93. (10.1016/j.socec.2015.09.002) DOI

Brañas-Garza P, Rustichini A. 2011. Organizing effects of testosterone and economic behavior: not just risk taking. PLoS ONE 6, e29842 (10.1371/journal.pone.0029842) PubMed DOI PMC

Brañas-Garza P, Galizzi M, Nieboer J. 2018. Experimental and self-reported measures of risk taking and digit ratio (2D : 4D): evidence from a large, systematic study. Int. Econ. Rev. 59, 1131–1157. (10.1111/iere.12299) DOI

Frederick S. 2005. Cognitive reflection and decision making. J. Econ. Perspect. 19, 25–42. (10.1257/089533005775196732) DOI

Brañas-Garza P, Cobo-Reyes R, Domínguez A. 2006. Si él lo necesita: gypsy fairness in Vallecas. Exp. Econ. 9, 253–264. (10.1007/s10683-006-9126-0) DOI

Brañas-Garza P, Espín AM, Exadaktylos F, Herrmann B. 2014. Fair and unfair punishers coexist in the Ultimatum Game. Sci. Rep. 4, 6025 (10.1038/srep06025) PubMed DOI PMC

Ermisch J, Gambetta D, Laurie H, Siedler T, Noah Uhrig SC. 2009. Measuring people's trust. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A 172, 749–769. (10.1111/j.1467-985X.2009.00591.x) DOI

Charness G, Gneezy U, Halladay B. 2016. Experimental methods: pay one or pay all. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 131, 141–150. (10.1016/j.jebo.2016.08.010) DOI

Brañas-Garza P, Jorrat D, Espín AM, Sanchez A. 2019. Paid and hypothetical time preferences are the same: lab, field and online evidence. mimeo.

Kaltwasser L, Hildebrand A, Wilhel O, Sommerab W. 2017. On the relationship of emotional abilities and prosocial behavior. Evol. Hum. Behav. 38, 298–308. (10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.10.011) DOI

Peysakhovich A, Nowak MA, Rand DG. 2014. Humans display a ‘cooperative phenotype’ that is domain general and temporally stable. Nat. Commun. 5, 4939 (10.1038/ncomms5939) PubMed DOI

Mazur A, Booth A. 1998. Testosterone and dominance in men. J. Behav. Brain Sci. 21, 353–363. (10.1017/S0140525X98001228) PubMed DOI

Millet K. 2011. An interactionist perspective on the relation between 2D : 4D and behavior: an overview of (moderated) relationships between 2D : 4D and economic decision making. Pers. Individ. Dif. 51, 397–401. (10.1016/j.paid.2010.04.005) DOI

Ryckmans J, Millet K, Warlop L. 2015. The influence of facial characteristics on the relation between male 2D : 4D and dominance. PLoS ONE 10, e0143307 (10.1371/journal.pone.0143307) PubMed DOI PMC

Millet K, Buehler F. 2018. A context dependent interpretation of inconsistencies in 2D : 4D findings: the moderating role of status relevance. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 11, 254 (10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00254) PubMed DOI PMC

Buskens V, Raub W, Van Miltenburg N, Montoya ER, Van Honk J. 2016. Testosterone administration moderates effect of social environment on trust in women depending on second-to-fourth digit ratio. Sci. Rep. 6, 27655 (10.1038/srep27655) PubMed DOI PMC

Chen C, Decety J, Huang PC, Chen CY, Cheng Y. 2016. Testosterone administration in females modulates moral judgment and patterns of brain activation and functional connectivity. Hum. Brain Mapp. 37, 3417–3430. (10.1002/hbm.23249) PubMed DOI PMC

Manning J, Kilduff L, Cook C, Crewther B, Fink B. 2014. Digit ratio (2D : 4D): a biomarker for prenatal sex steroids and adult sex steroids in challenge situations. Front. Endocrinol. 5, 9 (10.3389/fendo.2014.00009) PubMed DOI PMC

Yamagishi T, et al. 2012. Rejection of unfair offers in the ultimatum game is no evidence of strong reciprocity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 20 364–20 368. (10.1073/pnas.1212126109) PubMed DOI PMC

Yamagishi T, Horita Y, Takagishi H, Shinada M, Tanida S, Cook KS. 2009. The private rejection of unfair offers and emotional commitment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 11 520–11 523. (10.1073/pnas.0900636106) PubMed DOI PMC

Espín AM, Exadaktylos F, Herrmann B, Brañas-Garza P. 2015. Short-and long-run goals in ultimatum bargaining: impatience predicts spite-based behavior. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 9, 214 (10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00214) PubMed DOI PMC

Staffiero G, Exadaktylos F, Espín AM. 2013. Accepting zero in the ultimatum game does not reflect selfish preferences. Econ. Lett. 121, 236–238. (10.5061/dryad.rn288jt) DOI

Brañas-Garza P, Espín AM, García-Muñoz T, Kovářík J. 2019. Data from: Digit ratio (2D : 4D) and prosocial behaviour in economic games: no direct correlation with generosity, bargaining or trust-related behaviours Dryad Digital Repository. (10.5061/dryad.rn288jt) PubMed DOI PMC

Digit ratio (2D : 4D) and prosocial behaviour in economic games: no direct correlation with generosity, bargaining or trust-related behaviours

See more in PubMed

Dryad
10.5061/dryad.rn288jt

figshare
10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4614497