Accurate predictive modelling facilitates efficient and effective trait selection in animal breeding and can decrease costs while maximizing profits when raising economically important animals. The objective of this study was to extend a previously developed bioeconomic model and computer program to calculate the marginal economic values (MEVs) and economic weights (EWs) for direct and maternal pig traits affected by new reproductive traits, namely the number of sow functional teats (NFTs) and boar sperm quality traits (SQTs) that included sperm volume, sperm concentration, motility percentage and percentage of abnormal spermatozoa. The MEV of NFTs represented the cost differences between naturally and artificially reared piglets until weaning and the cost differences between naturally and artificially reared finished animals. The MEVs of SQTs expressed the saved costs for artificial insemination, assuming a decreased price per insemination dose when improving the SQTs. The absolute and relative EWs for the newly defined complex of traits in the breeding objectives for pig breeds involved in the Czech national three-way crossing system (Czech Large White [CLW], Czech Landrace [CL] and Pietrain [PN]) were calculated using gene flow methods. The NFT trait was included only for dam breeds, and the relative EW averaged 3.6% of the total economic importance based on the genetic standard deviations of all 19 simultaneously evaluated traits in CLW and CL breeds. The relative EWs of the four SQTs comprised 2.0% of the total economic importance of the 19 traits in the CLW and CL dam breeds and 8% of the total economic importance of the 18 traits in the PN sire breed. Therefore, inclusion of the NFTs for dam breeds and SQTs for sire breeds in the breeding goal is recommended to aid in obtaining ideal outcomes with optimal economic values.

Institute of Animal Science Prague Uhříněves Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Baxter, E. M., Rutherford, K. M. D., D’Eath, R. B., Arnott, G., Turner, S. P., Sandøe, P., … Lawrence, A. B. (2013). The welfare implications of large litter size in the domestic pig II: Management factors. Animal Welfare, 22, 219-238. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.22.2.219

González-Peña, D., Knox, R. V., MacNeil, M. D., & Rodriguez-Zas, S. L. (2015). Genetic gain and economic values of selection strategies including semen traits in three- and four-way crossbreeding systems for swine production. Journal of Animal Science, 93, 879-891. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-8035

Grandjot, G., Brandt, H., & Glodek, P. (1997). Genetic and phenotypic investigation of performance-, semen- and fertility characters of artificial insemination boars. 1. Systematic effects and genetic parameters (in German). Archiv Für Tierzucht, 40, 421-432.

Hoy, P. D. S. (2000). Technical apparatuses for piglets (in German). DLG Merkblatt 318. Max-Eyth-Verlagsgesellschaft mbH:Frankfurt am Main.

Hoy, P. D. S. (2004). Artificial nurse system: The handling had to match (in German). Top Agrar, 11, 69-71.

Knecht, D., Jankowska-Mąkosa, A., & Duziński, K. (2017). The dependence of the growth rate and meat content of young boars on semen parameters and conception rate. Animal, 11, 802-810. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731116001993

Krupa, E., Krupová, Z., Wolfová, M., & Žáková, E. (2017). Estimation of economic values for traits of pig breeds in different breeding systems: II. Model application to a three-way crossing system. Livestock Science, 205, 70-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2017.09.018

Krupa, E., Žáková, E., Krupová, Z., & Michaličková, M. (2016). Estimation of genetic parameters for teat number and reproduction and production traits from different data sources for Czech dam breeds. Livestock Science, 191, 97-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.07.018

Krupová, Z., Žáková, E., Krupa, E., & Michaličková, M. (2017). New breeding objectives for the Czech pig population. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 87, 778-781.

Lewis, N. J., Hurnik, J. F., & Gordon, D. J. (1982). Nursing apparatus for neonatal piglets. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 62, 975-978. org/104141/cjas82-121

Long, T., Aasmundstad, T., & Holm, B. (2010). Genetics of teat quantity and quality in Norwegian Landrace. In: Proceedings of the 9th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production (pp. 4). Leipzig, Germany, Report 867.

Lundeheim, N., Chalkias, H., & Rydhmer, L. (2013). Genetic analysis of teat number and litter traits in pigs. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A - Animal Science, 63, 121-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064702.2013.841749

Niggemeyer, H. (2008). Nurse sows save piglet life (in German). Schweinezucht Und Schweinemast, 5, 50-52.

Rohrer, G. A., & Nonneman, D. J. (2017). Analysis of teat number in pigs reveals some developmental pathways independent of vertebra number and several loci which only effect specific side. Genetic Selection Evolution, 49, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-016-0282-1

Smital, J., Wolf, J., & Sousa, L. D. (2005). Estimation of genetic parameters of semen characteristics and reproductive traits in AI boars. Animal Reproduction Science, 86(1-2), 119-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.05.023

Sørensen, A. C. (2015). Subjective definition of traits and economic values for selection of organic sows in Denmark. 66th Annual Meeting of the European Federation of Animal Science (pp. 465) Book of Abstracts No. 21. Warsaw, Poland.

Sutrum, L. S., & Gärke, C. H. (2012). Artificial reared piglets - performance and economic results till slaughter (in German). Retrieved from https://www.proteinmarkt.de

Tölle, K.-H. (2009). What is a top operation (in German), Schweinezucht und Schweinemast (2, pp. 60).

Tölle, K.-H., & Mayer, C. (2008). Current pigs: Handling of many neonatal piglets (Part 2): Experiences with technical nursing apparatuses in LVZ Futterkamp (in German). Bauernblatt, 15, 37-39.

Wolf, J. (2009). Genetic parameters for semen traits in AI boars estimated from data on individual ejaculates. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 44, 338-344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01083.x

Wolf, J., & Smital, J. (2009). Quantification of factors affecting semen traits in artificial insemination boars from animal model analyses. Journal of Animal Science, 87, 1620-1627. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1373

Wolfová, M., Krupa, E., Krupová, Z., & Žáková, E. (2019). Economic weights of maternal and direct traits of pigs calculated by applying gene flow methods. Animal, 13, 1127-1136. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118002513

Wolfová, M., & Nitter, G. (2004). Relative economic weights of maternal versus direct traits in breeding schemes. Livestock Production Science, 88, 112-127. org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2003.09.024

Wolfová, M., Wolf, J., Krupová, Z., Krupa, E., & Žáková, E. (2017). Estimation of economic values for traits of pig breeds in different breeding systems: I. Model Development. Livestock Science, 205, 79-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2017.09.019

An Assessment of the Genetic Parameters of Boars' Reproductive Traits