• This record comes from PubMed

A first report on competitive inhibition of laccase enzyme by lignin degradation intermediates

. 2020 Apr ; 65 (2) : 431-437. [epub] 20191220

Language English Country United States Media print-electronic

Document type Journal Article

Links

PubMed 31863277
DOI 10.1007/s12223-019-00765-5
PII: 10.1007/s12223-019-00765-5
Knihovny.cz E-resources

Laccases have been widely explored for their ligninolytic capability in bioethanol production and bioremediation of industrial effluents. However, low reaction rates have posed a major challenge to commercialization of such processes. This study reports the first evidence of laccase inhibition by two types of lignin degradation intermediates - fungal-solubilized lignin and alkali-treated lignin - thus offering a highly plausible explanation for low reaction rates due to buildup of inhibitors during the actual process. Reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography revealed the presence of similar polar compounds in both lignin samples. A detailed kinetic study on laccase, using 2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) (ABTS) as the substrate, was used to calculate the Michaelis constant (Km) and maximum reaction rate (Vmax). With an increase in the concentration of lignin degradation intermediates, Vmax remained nearly constant, while Km increased from 1.3 to 4.0 times that of pure laccase, revealing that the inhibition was competitive in nature. The kinetic studies reported here and the insight gained into the nature of inhibition can help design process strategies to mitigate this effect and improve overall process efficiency. This work is applicable to processes that employ laccase for delignification of biomass, such as second-generation biofuels processes, as well as for industrial effluent treatment in paper and pulp industries.

See more in PubMed

Chem Rec. 2017 Jan;17(1):122-140 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000 Mar;66(3):920-4 PubMed

Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 07;7:42121 PubMed

Biotechnol Adv. 2006 Sep-Oct;24(5):500-13 PubMed

Enzyme Res. 2010 Sep 21;2010:149748 PubMed

Enzyme Res. 2011;2011:217861 PubMed

Bioresour Technol. 2004 Dec;95(3):309-17 PubMed

Enzyme Res. 2011;2011:725172 PubMed

Chemosphere. 2005 Aug;60(8):1124-8 PubMed

J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014 Dec 28;24(12):1673-8 PubMed

Biotechnol Prog. 2017 Jul;33(4):1015-1034 PubMed

Biotechnol Prog. 2009 May-Jun;25(3):763-73 PubMed

Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2017 Apr;181(4):1561-1572 PubMed

J Biotechnol. 2000 Mar 10;78(2):193-9 PubMed

Bioresour Technol. 2018 Jan;247:1181-1183 PubMed

Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2009 May;157(2):174-209 PubMed

Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2016 Jul;39(7):1041-9 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992 Apr;58(4):1121-7 PubMed

J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2018 May;29(5):1044-1059 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 Feb;49(2):273-8 PubMed

Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2015 Dec;38(12):2285-313 PubMed

Lett Appl Microbiol. 2001 May;32(5):331-5 PubMed

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...