Sustainability of the workforce becomes a crucial issue, of which responsible care for employees can increase job satisfaction and human capital that impact corporate ability to absorb and generate new knowledge. Firms are obligated to provide a healthy and safe working environment for their employees, but it may in turn hinder innovation due to rigid and structured institutional regulations. Drawing on data of 308 China's pharmaceutical firms from 2010 to 2017, we investigated whether employee care can trigger innovation under corporate adoption of the occupational health and safety management system (OHSMS). Our results suggest that both employee care and OHSMS adoption have a positive impact on innovation. Moreover, the positive relationship between employee care and innovation was more pronounced in firms that had adopted the OHSMS certification. These findings are valuable to policymakers and corporate managers in emerging economies through corroborating the important role of workforce sustainability in facilitating firm innovation.

Faculty of Informatics and Management University of Hradec Kralove 50002 Hradec Kralove Czech Republic

International Business School Guangzhou College of South China University of Technology Guangzhou 510800 China

See more in PubMed

Holmstrom B. Agency costs and innovation. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 1989;12:305–327. doi: 10.1016/0167-2681(89)90025-5. DOI

Hauser J., Tellis G.J., Griffin A. Research on Innovation: A Review and Agenda for Marketing Science. Mark. Sci. 2006;25:687–717. doi: 10.1287/mksc.1050.0144. DOI

Chen C.-J., Huang J.-W. Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance—The mediating role of knowledge management capacity. J. Bus. Res. 2009;62:104–114. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.11.016. DOI

Chang X., Fu K., Low A., Zhang W. Non-executive employee stock options and corporate innovation. J. Financial Econ. 2015;115:168–188. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.09.002. DOI

Chen C., Chen Y., Hsu P.-H., Podolski E.J. Be nice to your innovators: Employee treatment and corporate innovation performance. J. Corp. Financ. 2016;39:78–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.06.001. DOI

Hall B.H. The Financing of Research and Development. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy. 2002;18:35–51. doi: 10.1093/oxrep/18.1.35. DOI

Acharya V.V., Subramanian K., Baghai R. Wrongful Discharge Laws and Innovation. SSRN Electron. J. 2012;27:301–346. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1570663. DOI

Tong L., Liu N., Zhang M., Wang L. Employee Protection and Corporate Innovation: Empirical Evidence from China. J. Bus. Ethic. 2018;153:569–589. doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3412-3. DOI

Bradley D.J., Kim I., Tian X. Providing Protection or Encouraging Holdup? The Effects of Labor Unions on Innovation. SSRN Electron. J. 2013 doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2232351. DOI

El Manzani Y., Sidmou M.L., Cegarra J.-J. Does IS0 9001 quality management system support product innovation? An analysis from the sociotechnical systems theory. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 2019;36:951–982. doi: 10.1108/IJQRM-09-2017-0174. DOI

Zhou H., Dekker R., Kleinknecht A. Flexible labor and innovation performance: Evidence from longitudinal firm-level data. Ind. Corp. Chang. 2011;20:941–968. doi: 10.1093/icc/dtr013. DOI

Bloom N., Liang J., Roberts J., Ying Z.J. Does Working from Home Work? Evidence from a Chinese Experiment *. Q. J. Econ. 2015;130:165–218. doi: 10.1093/qje/qju032. DOI

Samma M., Zhao Y., Rasool S.F., Han X., Ali S. Exploring the Relationship between Innovative Work Behavior, Job Anxiety, Workplace Ostracism, and Workplace Incivility: Empirical Evidence from Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (SMEs) Health. 2020;8:508. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8040508. PubMed DOI PMC

Barnett M.L., Salomon R.M. Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance. Strat. Manag. J. 2006;27:1101–1122. doi: 10.1002/smj.557. DOI

Yang M., Bento P., Akbar A. Does CSR Influence Firm Performance Indicators? Evidence from Chinese Pharmaceutical Enterprises. Sustainability. 2019;11:5656. doi: 10.3390/su11205656. DOI

Robson L.S., Clarke J.A., Cullen K., Bielecky A., Severin C., Bigelow P.L., Irvin E., Culyer A., Mahood Q. The effectiveness of occupational health and safety management system interventions: A systematic review. Saf. Sci. 2007;45:329–353. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2006.07.003. DOI

Abad J., Lafuente E., Vilajosana J. An assessment of the OHSAS 18001 certification process: Objective drivers and consequences on safety performance and labour productivity. Saf. Sci. 2013;60:47–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.06.011. DOI

Morgado L., Silva F.J.G., Fonseca L. Mapping Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems in Portugal: Outlook for ISO 45001:2018 adoption. Procedia Manuf. 2019;38:755–764. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.103. DOI

Fernández-Muñiz B., Montes-Peón J.M., Vázquez-Ordás C.J. Occupational risk management under the OHSAS 18001 standard: Analysis of perceptions and attitudes of certified firms. J. Clean. Prod. 2012;24:36–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.008. DOI

Jallon R., Imbeau D., De Marcellis-Warin N. Development of an indirect-cost calculation model suitable for workplace use. J. Saf. Res. 2011;42:149–164. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2011.05.006. PubMed DOI

Hernandez-Vivanco A., Domingues J.P., Sampaio P., Bernardo M., Cruz-Cázares C. Do multiple certifications leverage firm performance? A dynamic approach. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2019;218:386–399. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.07.016. DOI

Prajogo D., Sohal A.S. The integration of TQM and technology/R&D management in determining quality and innovation performance. Omega. 2006;34:296–312. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2004.11.004. DOI

Castillo-Rojas S.M., Casadesús M., Karapetrovic S., Coromina L., Heras I., Martín I. Is implementing multiple management system standards a hindrance to innovation? Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excel. 2012;23:1075–1088. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2012.678587. DOI

Hofman P.S., Newman A. The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on organizational commitment and the moderating role of collectivism and masculinity: Evidence from China. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2013;25:631–652. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2013.792861. DOI

Zhao L., Lee J., Moon S. Employee response to CSR in China: The moderating effect of collectivism. Pers. Rev. 2019;48:839–863. doi: 10.1108/PR-05-2017-0146. DOI

National Bureau of Statistics of China. [(accessed on 30 January 2020)];2019 Available online: http://www.mohrss.gov.cn/SYrlzyhshbzb/zwgk/szrs/tjsj/201901/t20190130_309968.html.

National Health Commission of China. [(accessed on 15 July 2019)];2019 Available online: http://www.nhc.gov.cn/guihuaxxs/jkzgxdzt/xkzgxd.shtml.

National Health Commission of China. [(accessed on 9 November 2020)];2019 Available online: http://www.nhc.gov.cn/qjjys/s3581/201611/020f81dbd32a47bab97633187ada48ab.shtml.

Simon A., Yaya L.H.P. Improving innovation and customer satisfaction through systems integration. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2012;112:1026–1043. doi: 10.1108/02635571211255005. DOI

Hoskisson R.E., Hitt M.A., Johnson R.A., Grossman W. Conflicting Voices: The Effects of Institutional Ownership Heterogeneity and Internal Governance on Corporate Innovation Strategies. Acad. Manag. J. 2002;45:697–716. doi: 10.5465/3069305. DOI

Onetti A., Zucchella A., Jones M.V., McDougall-Covin P.P. Internationalization, innovation and entrepreneurship: Business models for new technology-based firms. J. Manag. Gov. 2010;16:337–368. doi: 10.1007/s10997-010-9154-1. DOI

Malerba F. Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Res. Policy. 2002;31:247–264. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00139-1. DOI

Ciliberti S., Carraresi L., Bröring S. Drivers of innovation in Italy: Food versus pharmaceutical industry. Br. Food J. 2016;118:1292–1316. doi: 10.1108/BFJ-10-2015-0405. DOI

Spender J.C. Industry Recipes—An Enquiry into the Nature and Sources of Managerial Judgement. Blackwell Pub; Oxford, UK: 1989.

Achilladelis B., Antonakis N. The dynamics of technological innovation: The case of the pharmaceutical industry. Res. Policy. 2001;30:535–588. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00093-7. DOI

Technology Intensity Definition: Classification of Manufacturing Industries into Categories Based on R&D Intensities. [(accessed on 7 July 2020)]; Available online: https://www.oecd.org/sti/ind/48350231.pdf.

Liu C., Xia G. Research on the Dynamic Interrelationship among R&D Investment, Technological Innovation, and Economic Growth in China. Sustainability. 2018;10:4260. doi: 10.3390/su10114260. DOI

DiMasi J.A., Hansen R.W., Grabowski H.G. The price of innovation: New estimates of drug development costs. J. Health Econ. 2003;22:151–185. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(02)00126-1. PubMed DOI

DiMasi J.A., Grabowski H.G., Hansen R.W. Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: New estimates of R&D costs. J. Health Econ. 2016;47:20–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.01.012. PubMed DOI

Hering S., Loretz B., Friedli T., Lehr C.-M., Stieneker F. Can lifecycle management safeguard innovation in the pharmaceutical industry? Drug Discov. Today. 2018;23:1962–1973. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2018.10.008. PubMed DOI

Sahasranamam S., Rentala S., Rose E.L. Knowledge Sources and International Business Activity in a Changing Innovation Ecosystem: A Study of the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry. Manag. Organ. Rev. 2019;15:595–614. doi: 10.1017/mor.2019.35. DOI

Casper S., Matraves C. Institutional frameworks and innovation in the German and UK pharmaceutical industry. Res. Policy. 2003;32:1865–1879. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00082-9. DOI

Matraves C. Market Structure, R&D and Advertising in the Pharmaceutical Industry. J. Ind. Econ. 2003;47:169–194. doi: 10.1111/1467-6451.00096. DOI

Malerba F. Innovation and market structure in the dynamics of the pharmaceutical industry and biotechnology: Towards a history-friendly model. Ind. Corp. Chang. 2002;11:667–703. doi: 10.1093/icc/11.4.667. DOI

He W., Shen R. ISO 14001 Certification and Corporate Technological Innovation: Evidence from Chinese Firms. J. Bus. Ethic. 2017;158:97–117. doi: 10.1007/s10551-017-3712-2. DOI

Janowski A. Philanthropy and the Contribution of Andrew Carnegie to Corporate Social Responsibility. Sustainability. 2020;13:155. doi: 10.3390/su13010155. DOI

Lubberink R., Blok V., Van Ophem J., Omta O. Responsible innovation by social entrepreneurs: An exploratory study of values integration in innovations. J. Responsible Innov. 2019;6:179–210. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2019.1572374. DOI

Abrunhosa A., Sá P.M.E. Are TQM principles supporting innovation in the Portuguese footwear industry? Technovation. 2008;28:208–221. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2007.08.001. DOI

Khan B.A., Naeem H. Measuring the impact of soft and hard quality practices on service innovation and organisational performance. Total. Qual. Manag. Bus. Excel. 2018;29:1402–1426. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2016.1263543. DOI

Sen S., Bhattacharya C., Korschun D. The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Strengthening Multiple Stakeholder Relationships: A Field Experiment. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2006;34:158–166. doi: 10.1177/0092070305284978. DOI

Luo X., Du S. Exploring the relationship between corporate social responsibility and firm innovation. Mark. Lett. 2015;26:703–714. doi: 10.1007/s11002-014-9302-5. DOI

Du S., Bhattacharya C.B., Sen S. Corporate Social Responsibility and Competitive Advantage: Overcoming the Trust Barrier. Manag. Sci. 2011;57:1528–1545. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1110.1403. DOI

Lee K., Mileski M., Fohn J., Frye L., Brooks L. Facilitators and Barriers Surrounding the Role of Administration in Employee Job Satisfaction in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Systematic Review. Health. 2020;8:360. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8040360. PubMed DOI PMC

Holman D., Totterdell P., Axtell C., Stride C., Port R., Svensson R., Zibarras L., Stride C. Job Design and the Employee Innovation Process: The Mediating Role of Learning Strategies. J. Bus. Psychol. 2011;27:177–191. doi: 10.1007/s10869-011-9242-5. DOI

Lin H.-F. Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on employee knowledge sharing intentions. J. Inf. Sci. 2007;33:135–149. doi: 10.1177/0165551506068174. DOI

Andries P., Czarnitzki D. Small firm innovation performance and employee involvement. Small Bus. Econ. 2014;43:21–38. doi: 10.1007/s11187-014-9577-1. DOI

Yang M., Marešová P. Adopting Occupational Health and Safety Management Standards: The Impact on Financial Performance in Pharmaceutical Firms in China. Health Policy Politiques de Sante. 2020;13:1477–1487. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S261136. PubMed DOI PMC

Rennings K., Ziegler A., Ankele K., Hoffmann E. The influence of different characteristics of the EU environmental management and auditing scheme on technical environmental innovations and economic performance. Ecol. Econ. 2006;57:45–59. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.013. DOI

Kafetzopoulos D., Gotzamani K., Gkana V. Relationship between quality management, innovation and competitiveness. Evidence from Greek companies. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2015;26:1177–1200. doi: 10.1108/JMTM-02-2015-0007. DOI

López-Mielgo N., Montes-Peón J.M., Vázquez-Ordás C.J. Are quality and innovation management conflicting activities? Technovation. 2009;29:537–545. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2009.02.005. DOI

Naveh E., Erez M. Innovation and Attention to Detail in the Quality Improvement Paradigm. Manag. Sci. 2004;50:1576–1586. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1040.0272. DOI

Blank T.-H., Naveh E. Do Quality and Innovation Compete Against or Complement Each Other? The Moderating Role of an Information Exchange Climate. Qual. Manag. J. 2014;21:6–16. doi: 10.1080/10686967.2014.11918382. DOI

Terziovski M., Guerrero J.-L. ISO 9000 quality system certification and its impact on product and process innovation performance. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2014;158:197–207. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.08.011. DOI

Song Y., Qin S. The relationship between quality management and new product development: Evidence from China. Oper. Manag. Res. 2015;8:1–14. doi: 10.1007/s12063-014-0096-7. DOI

Tsai W., Ghoshal S. Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks. Acad. Manag. J. 1998;41:464–476. doi: 10.5465/257085. DOI

Richey R.G., Genchev S.E., Daugherty P.J. The role of resource commitment and innovation in reverse logistics performance. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2005;35:233–257. doi: 10.1108/09600030510599913. DOI

Cassiman B., Veugelers R. In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition. Manag. Sci. 2006;52:68–82. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1050.0470. DOI

Zeng J., Zhang W., Matsui Y., Zhao X. The impact of organizational context on hard and soft quality management and innovation performance. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2017;185:240–251. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.12.031. DOI

Salanova M., Schaufeli W.B. A cross-national study of work engagement as a mediator between job resources and proactive behaviour. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2008;19:116–131. doi: 10.1080/09585190701763982. DOI

Barney J. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. J. Manag. 1991;17:99–120. doi: 10.1177/014920639101700108. DOI

Fan D., Lo C.K. A tough pill to swallow? J. Fash. Mark. Manag. Int. J. 2012;16:128–140. doi: 10.1108/13612021211222798. DOI

Russo M.V. Explaining the impact of ISO 14001 on emission performance: A dynamic capabilities perspective on process and learning. Bus. Strat. Environ. 2009;18:307–319. doi: 10.1002/bse.587. DOI

Madrid-Guijarro A., Garcia D., Van Auken H. Barriers to Innovation among Spanish Manufacturing SMEs. J. Small Bus. Manag. 2009;47:465–488. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-627X.2009.00279.x. DOI

Medase S.K., Abdul-Basit S. External knowledge modes and firm-level innovation performance: Empirical evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. J. Innov. Knowl. 2019;5:81–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2019.08.001. DOI

Dass N., Nanda V., Xiao S.C. Truncation bias corrections in patent data: Implications for recent research on innovation. J. Corp. Financ. 2017;44:353–374. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.03.010. DOI

Läpple D., Renwick A.W., Thorne F. Measuring and understanding the drivers of agricultural innovation: Evidence from Ireland. Food Policy. 2015;51:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.11.003. DOI

Block J., Miller D., Jaskiewicz P., Spiegel F. Economic and Technological Importance of Innovations in Large Family and Founder Firms. Fam. Bus. Rev. 2013;26:180–199. doi: 10.1177/0894486513477454. DOI

Jun S.H. Technology Forecasting of Green Energy Using Patent Analysis and Simulation Modeling. Adv. Mater. Res. 2014;875:1619–1624. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.875-877.1619. DOI

Chen Y.-S., Chang K.-C. The relationship between a firm’s patent quality and its market value—The case of US pharmaceutical industry. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2010;77:20–33. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.06.003. DOI

Arora A., Belenzon S., Rios L.A. Make, buy, organize: The interplay between research, external knowledge, and firm structure. Strat. Manag. J. 2014;35:317–337. doi: 10.1002/smj.2098. DOI

Xiong B., Lu W., Skitmore M., Chau K., Ye M. Virtuous nexus between corporate social performance and financial performance: A study of construction enterprises in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2016;129:223–233. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.078. DOI

Hexun CSR Evaluation System. [(accessed on 29 November 2020)]; Available online: http://stockdata.stock.hexun.com/zrbg/Plate.aspx.

Cronqvist H., Heyman F., Nilsson M., Svaleryd H., Vlachos J. Do Entrenched Managers Pay Their Workers More? J. Financ. 2009;64:309–339. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01435.x. DOI

Tata J., Prasad S. CSR Communication: An Impression Management Perspective. J. Bus. Ethic. 2014;132:765–778. doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2328-z. DOI

Fan P. Innovation in China. J. Econ. Surv. 2014;28:725–745. doi: 10.1111/joes.12083. DOI

Goetzel R.Z., Ozminkowski R.J., Sederer L.I., Mark T.L. The Business Case for Quality Mental Health Services: Why Employers Should Care About the Mental Health and Well-Being of Their Employees. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2002;44:320–330. doi: 10.1097/00043764-200204000-00012. PubMed DOI