Effects of DNA preservation solution and DNA extraction methods on microbial community profiling of soil
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
Grant support
216-2015-FONDECYT
FONDECYT-CONCYTEC
PubMed
33834428
PubMed Central
PMC8298342
DOI
10.1007/s12223-021-00866-0
PII: 10.1007/s12223-021-00866-0
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- DNA, Bacterial * genetics isolation & purification MeSH
- Genetic Techniques * standards MeSH
- Microbiota * genetics MeSH
- Environmental Monitoring * methods MeSH
- Soil Microbiology * MeSH
- RNA, Ribosomal, 16S genetics MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Names of Substances
- DNA, Bacterial * MeSH
- RNA, Ribosomal, 16S MeSH
Microbial community profiling using high-throughput sequencing relies in part on the preservation of the DNA and the effectiveness of the DNA extraction method. This study aimed at understanding to what extent these parameters affect the profiling. We obtained samples treated with and without a preservation solution. Also, we compared DNA extraction kits from Qiagen and Zymo-Research. The types of samples were defined strains, both as single species and mixtures, as well as undefined indigenous microbial communities from soil. We show that the use of a preservation solution resulted in substantial changes in the 16S rRNA gene profiles either due to an overrepresentation of Gram-positive bacteria or to an underrepresentation of Gram-negative bacteria. In addition, 16S rRNA gene profiles were substantially different depending on the type of kit that was used for extraction. The kit from Zymo extracted DNA from different types of bacteria in roughly equal amounts. In contrast, the kit from Qiagen preferentially extracted DNA from Gram-negative bacteria while DNA from Gram-positive bacteria was extracted less effectively. These differences in kit performance strongly influenced the interpretation of our microbial ecology studies.
Ricardo Energy and Environment Harwell UK
Shell Global Solutions International BV The Hague The Netherlands
See more in PubMed
Brown DM, Okoro S, van Gils J, et al. Comparison of landfarming amendments to improve bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons in Niger Delta soils. Sci Total Environ. 2017;596–597:284–292. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.072. PubMed DOI
Chen Z, Hui PC, Hui M et al (2019) Impact of preservation method and 16S rRNA hypervariable region on gut microbiota profiling. mSystems 4. 10.1128/mSystems.00271-18 PubMed PMC
de Vries GE, Harms N, Hoogendijk J, Stouthamer AH. Isolation and characterization of Paracoccus denitrificans mutants with increased conjugation frequencies and pleiotropic loss of a (nGATCn) DNA-modifying property. Arch Microbiol. 1989;152:52–57. doi: 10.1007/BF00447011. DOI
Felske A, Rheims H, Wolterink A, et al. Ribosome analysis reveals prominent activity of an uncultured member of the class Actinobacteria in grassland soils. Microbiology. 1997;143:2983–2989. doi: 10.1099/00221287-143-9-2983. PubMed DOI
Harry M, Gambier B, Garnier-Sillam E. Soil conservation for DNA preservation for bacterial molecular studies. Eur J Soil Biol. 2000;36:51–55. doi: 10.1016/S1164-5563(00)00044-3. DOI
Jackson CR, Harper JP, Willoughby D et al (1997) A simple, efficient method for the separation of humic substances and DNA from environmental samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:4993–4995. 10.1128/AEM.63.12.4993-4995.1997 PubMed PMC
Jeske O, Schüler M, Schumann P, et al. Planctomycetes do possess a peptidoglycan cell wall. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7116. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8116. PubMed DOI PMC
Kozich JJ, Westcott SL, Baxter NT, et al. Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79:5112–5120. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01043-13. PubMed DOI PMC
Lakay FM, Botha A, Prior BA. Comparative analysis of environmental DNA extraction and purification methods from different humic acid-rich soils. J Appl Microbiol. 2007;102:265–273. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03052.x. PubMed DOI
Lauber CL, Zhou N, Gordon JI, et al. Effect of storage conditions on the assessment of bacterial community structure in soil and human-associated samples. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2010;307:80–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.01965.x. PubMed DOI PMC
Lim HJ, Choi JH, Son A (2017) Necessity of purification during bacterial DNA extraction with environmental soils. Environ Health Toxicol 32.10.5620/eht.e2017013 PubMed PMC
Mahalanabis M, Al-Muayad H, Dominika Kulinski M, et al. Cell lysis and DNA extraction of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria from whole blood in a disposable microfluidic chip. Lab Chip. 2009;9:2811–2817. doi: 10.1039/B905065P. PubMed DOI
Martin-Laurent F, Philippot L, Hallet S, et al. DNA Extraction from soils: old bias for new microbial diversity analysis methods. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67:2354–2359. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.5.2354-2359.2001. PubMed DOI PMC
McCarthy A, Chiang E, Schmidt ML, Denef VJ. RNA preservation agents and nucleic acid extraction method bias perceived bacterial community composition. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0121659. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121659. PubMed DOI PMC
McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e61217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217. PubMed DOI PMC
Moreira D (1998) Efficient removal of PCR inhibitors using agarose-embedded DNA preparations. Nucleic Acids Res 26:3309–3310. 10.1093/nar/26.13.3309 PubMed PMC
Persoh D, Theuerl S, Buscot F, Rambold G. Towards a universally adaptable method for quantitative extraction of high-purity nucleic acids from soil. J Microbiol Methods. 2008;75:19–24. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2008.04.009. PubMed DOI
Persoon IF, Buijs MJ, Özok AR, et al. The mycobiome of root canal infections is correlated to the bacteriome. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21:1871. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1980-3. PubMed DOI PMC
Pielou EC. The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. J Theor Biol. 1966;13:131–144. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(66)90013-0. DOI
Pilhofer M, Aistleitner K, Biboy J, et al. Discovery of chlamydial peptidoglycan reveals bacteria with murein sacculi but without FtsZ. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2856. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3856. PubMed DOI PMC
Poursat BAJ, van Spanning RJM, Braster M, et al. Long-term exposure of activated sludge in chemostats leads to changes in microbial communities composition and enhanced biodegradation of 4-chloroaniline and N-methylpiperazine. Chemosphere. 2020;242:125102. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125102. PubMed DOI
Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D590–D596. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1219. PubMed DOI PMC
R Development Core Team . R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020.
Rippin M, Komsic-Buchmann K, Becker B (2016) RNA isolation from biological soil crusts: methodological aspects Algol Stud 21–37. 10.1127/algol_stud/2016/0256
Rissanen AJ, Kurhela E, Aho T, et al. Storage of environmental samples for guaranteeing nucleic acid yields for molecular microbiological studies. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;88:977–984. doi: 10.1007/s00253-010-2838-2. PubMed DOI
Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, et al. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:7537–7541. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01541-09. PubMed DOI PMC
Sessitsch A, Gyamfi S, Stralis-Pavese N, et al. RNA isolation from soil for bacterial community and functional analysis: evaluation of different extraction and soil conservation protocols. J Microbiol Methods. 2002;51:171–179. doi: 10.1016/s0167-7012(02)00065-9. PubMed DOI
Sinclair L, Osman OA, Bertilsson S, Eiler A. Microbial community composition and diversity via 16S rRNA gene amplicons: evaluating the Illumina platform. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0116955. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116955. PubMed DOI PMC
Soliman T, Yang S-Y, Yamazaki T, Jenke-Kodama H. Profiling soil microbial communities with next-generation sequencing: the influence of DNA kit selection and technician technical expertise. PeerJ. 2017;5:e4178. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4178. PubMed DOI PMC
Speirs LBM, Rice DTF, Petrovski S, Seviour RJ (2019) The phylogeny, biodiversity, and ecology of the Chloroflexi in activated sludge Front Microbiol 10. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02015 PubMed PMC
Sperling T, O’Neil D, Nieciecki V, et al. Novel procedure for improved results in soil microbiome analysis using the DNeasy PowerSoil Pro Kit. Hilden, Germany: Qiagen; 2018.
Straube D, Juen A. Storage and shipping of tissue samples for DNA analyses: a case study on earthworms. Eur J Soil Biol. 2013;57:13–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2013.04.001. PubMed DOI PMC
Sutcliffe IC. Cell envelope architecture in the Chloroflexi: a shifting frontline in a phylogenetic turf war. Environ Microbiol. 2011;13:279–282. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02339.x. PubMed DOI
Tatangelo V, Franzetti A, Gandolfi I, et al. Effect of preservation method on the assessment of bacterial community structure in soil and water samples. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2014;356:32–38. doi: 10.1111/1574-6968.12475. PubMed DOI
Tsai YL, Olson BH. Rapid method for separation of bacterial DNA from humic substances in sediments for polymerase chain reaction. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1992;58:2292–2295. doi: 10.1128/aem.58.7.2292-2295.1992. PubMed DOI PMC
Teeseling MCF, van Mesman RJ, Kuru E et al (2015) Anammox Planctomycetes have a peptidoglycan cell wall. Nat Commun 6. 10.1038/ncomms7878 PubMed PMC
Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol. 1991;173:697–703. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.2.697-703.1991. PubMed DOI PMC
Weißbecker C, Buscot F, Wubet T. Preservation of nucleic acids by freeze-drying for next generation sequencing analyses of soil microbial communities. J Plant Ecol. 2017;10:81–90. doi: 10.1093/jpe/rtw042. DOI
Wüst PK, Nacke H, Kaiser K, et al. Estimates of soil bacterial ribosome content and diversity Are significantly affected by the nucleic acid extraction method employed. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82:2595–2607. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00019-16. PubMed DOI PMC
Xie K, Deng Y, Zhang X et al (2018) Biases in prokaryotic community amplicon sequencing affected by DNA extraction methods in both saline and non-saline soil. Front Microbiol 9. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01796 PubMed PMC
Zhang Z, Schwartz S, Wagner L, Miller W. A greedy algorithm for aligning DNA sequences. J Comput Biol J Comput Mol Cell Biol. 2000;7:203–214. doi: 10.1089/10665270050081478. PubMed DOI
Zielińska S, Radkowski P, Blendowska A, et al. The choice of the DNA extraction method may influence the outcome of the soil microbial community structure analysis. MicrobiologyOpen. 2017;6:e00453. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.453. PubMed DOI PMC
Zoetendal EG, Ben-Amor K, Akkermans ADL, et al. DNA isolation protocols affect the detection limit of PCR approaches of bacteria in samples from the human gastrointestinal tract. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2001;24:405–410. doi: 10.1078/0723-2020-00060. PubMed DOI