BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced disease may not be invited to participate in research based on the assumption that participation would be too burdensome for them. The aim of this study was to explore how patients with advanced disease and their relatives evaluate their experience with research participation. METHOD: This study used data from two parts of a larger project. The first dataset was a cross-sectional questionnaire study focused on priorities at the end of life. The second dataset used a longitudinal design with structured interviews on prognostic awareness. In both studies, participants evaluated their experience on a 5-point Likert scale and specified their motivation in an open-ended question. Data were collected in 6 hospitals in the Czech Republic with patients with advanced disease and life expectancy less than 1 year and their relatives. Data were analysed using non-parametric tests and thematic analysis. RESULTS: First dataset consisted of 167 patients and 102 relatives, and second dataset consisted of 135 patients and 92 relatives (in total, 496 respondents). Results were similar in both datasets, with half of the sample (53%, 48%) scoring neutral, and over 30% of the sample identified their experience as interesting. The most significant factors associated with the evaluation were religiosity (p = 0.001) and the type of diagnosis (p = 0.04). Motivation for participation was to improve care, support research, express own opinion, opportunity to talk and trusting relationship. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with advanced disease and relatives do not mind participating in palliative care research, and it can be even a positive experience for them.

1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic

3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Center for Palliative Care Dykova 15 Prague 110 00 Czech Republic

Faculty of Social Science Charles University Prague Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Higginson IJ, Evans CJ, Grande G, Preston N, Morgan M, McCrone P, et al. Evaluating complex interventions in end of life care: the MORECare statement on good practice generated by a synthesis of transparent expert consultations and systematic reviews. BMC Med. 2013;11(1):111. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-111. PubMed DOI PMC

Bloomer MJ, Hutchinson AM, Brooks L, Botti M. Dying persons’ perspectives on, or experiences of, participating in research: an integrative review. Palliat Med. 2018;32(4):851–860. doi: 10.1177/0269216317744503. PubMed DOI PMC

White C, Hardy J. What do palliative care patients and their relatives think about research in palliative care?—a systematic review. Support Care Cancer. 2010;18(8):905–911. doi: 10.1007/s00520-009-0724-1. PubMed DOI

Gysels MH, Evans C, Higginson IJ. Patient, caregiver, health professional and researcher views and experiences of participating in research at the end of life: a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12(1):123. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-123. PubMed DOI PMC

Bouida W, Grissa MH, Zorgati A, Beltaief K, Boubaker H, Sriha A, et al. Willingness to participate in health research: Tunisian survey. BMC Med Ethics. 2016;17(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0131-3. PubMed DOI PMC

Gysels M, Shipman C, Higginson IJ. “I will do it if it will help others:” motivations among patients taking part in qualitative studies in palliative care. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2008;35(4):347–355. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.05.012. PubMed DOI

Todd AMH, Laird BJA, Boyle D, Boyd AC, Colvin LA, Fallon MT. A systematic review examining the literature on attitudes of patients with advanced cancer toward research. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009;37(6):1078–1085. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.07.009. PubMed DOI

White CD, Hardy JR, Gilshenan KS, Charles MA, Pinkerton CR. Randomised controlled trials of palliative care – a survey of the views of advanced cancer patients and their relatives. Eur J Cancer. 2008;44(13):1820–1828. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.05.003. PubMed DOI

Kars MC, van Thiel GJ, van der Graaf R, Moors M, de Graeff A, van Delden JJ. A systematic review of reasons for gatekeeping in palliative care research. Palliat Med. 2016;30(6):533–548. doi: 10.1177/0269216315616759. PubMed DOI

Casarett DJ, Karlawish JHT. Are special ethical guidelines needed for palliative care research? J Pain Symptom Manage. 2000;20(2):130–139. doi: 10.1016/S0885-3924(00)00164-0. PubMed DOI

Moss AH, Ganjoo J, Sharma S, Gansor J, Senft S, Weaner B, et al. Utility of the “surprise” question to identify dialysis patients with high mortality. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3(5):1379–1384. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00940208. PubMed DOI PMC

Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. DOI

Vlckova K, Hoschlova E, Chroustova E, Loucka M. Psychometric properties of the Czech integrated palliative outcome scale: reliability and content validity analysis. BMC Palliat Care. 2020;19(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00552-x. PubMed DOI PMC

Terry W, Olson LG, Ravenscroft P, Wilss L, Boulton-Lewis G. Hospice patients’ views on research in palliative care. Intern Med J. 2006;36(7):406–413. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2006.01078.x. PubMed DOI

Pessin H, Galietta M, Nelson CJ, Brescia R, Rosenfeld B, Breitbart W. Burden and benefit of psychosocial research at the end of life. J Palliat Med. 2008;11(4):627–632. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2007.9923. PubMed DOI PMC

Ross C, Cornbleet M. Atitudes of patients and staff to research in a specialist palliative care unit. Palliat Med. 2003;17(6):491–497. doi: 10.1191/0269216303pm785oa. PubMed DOI

Moorcraft SY, Marriott C, Peckitt C, Cunningham D, Chau I, Starling N, et al. Patients’ willingness to participate in clinical trials and their views on aspects of cancer research: results of a prospective patient survey. Trials. 2016;17(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1105-3. PubMed DOI PMC

Emanuel EJ, Fairclough DL, Wolfe P, Emanuel LL. Talking with terminally Ill patients and their caregivers about death, dying, and bereavement: is it stressful? Is it helpful? Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(18):1999. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.18.1999. PubMed DOI

Aoun S, Slatyer S, Deas K, Nekolaichuk C. Family caregiver participation in palliative care research: challenging the myth. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017;53(5):851–861. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.12.327. PubMed DOI

'I couldn't live without hope': A qualitative study using reflexive thematic analysis on approaches to hope and prognostic awareness among people with advanced disease