Research priorities in pediatric parenteral nutrition: a consensus and perspective from ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR/CSPEN
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy
PubMed
34475525
PubMed Central
PMC9411056
DOI
10.1038/s41390-021-01670-9
PII: 10.1038/s41390-021-01670-9
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- fyziologie výživy dětí * MeSH
- kojenec MeSH
- konsensus MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- novorozenec MeSH
- parenterální výživa úplná MeSH
- parenterální výživa * MeSH
- výzkum MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- kojenec MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- novorozenec MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
Parenteral nutrition is used to treat children that cannot be fully fed by the enteral route. While the revised ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR/CSPEN pediatric parenteral nutrition guidelines provide clear guidance on the use of parenteral nutrition in neonates, infants, and children based on current available evidence, they have helped to crystallize areas where research is lacking or more studies are needed in order to refine recommendations. This paper collates and discusses the research gaps identified by the authors of each section of the guidelines and considers each nutrient or group of nutrients in turn, together with aspects around delivery and organization. The 99 research priorities identified were then ranked in order of importance by clinicians and researchers working in the field using a survey methodology. The highest ranked priority was the need to understand the relationship between total energy intake, rapid catch-up growth, later metabolic function, and neurocognitive outcomes. Research into the optimal intakes of macronutrients needed in order to achieve optimal outcomes also featured prominently. Identifying research priorities in PN should enable research to be focussed on addressing key issues. Multicentre trials, better definition of exposure and outcome variables, and long-term metabolic and developmental follow-up will be key to achieving this. IMPACT: The recent ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR/CSPEN guidelines for pediatric parenteral nutrition provided updated guidance for providing parenteral nutrition to infants and children, including recommendations for practice. However, in several areas there was a lack of evidence to guide practice, or research questions that remained unanswered. This paper summarizes the key priorities for research in pediatric parenteral nutrition, and ranks them in order of importance according to expert opinion.
Bnai Zion Medical Center Rappaport Faculty of Medicine Technion Haifa Israel
Children's Hospital University of Zagreb School of Medicine Zagreb Croatia
Department of Clinical Sciences Pediatrics Umeå University Umeå Sweden
Department of Neonatal Intensive Care CHU La Réunion Saint Pierre France
Department of Neonatal Intensive Care Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway
Department of Neonatal Medicine University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust Southampton UK
Department of Paediatrics University Hospital Motol Prague Czech Republic
Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital Rotterdam The Netherlands
Evangelisches Waldkrankenhaus Spandau Berlin Germany
France and CNRC Department of Pediatrics Baylor College of Medicine Houston TX USA
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Necker Enfants Malades Hospital Paris University Paris France
Neonatal Unit Newcastle University Newcastle upon Tyne UK
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Koletzko B, et al. 1. Guidelines on Paediatric Parenteral Nutrition of the European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) and the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN), Supported by the European Society of Paediatric Research (ESPR) J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2005;41(Suppl. 2):S1–87. PubMed
Mihatsch WA, et al. ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR/CSPEN guidelines on pediatric parenteral nutrition. Clin. Nutr. 2018;37:2303–2305. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.05.029. PubMed DOI
Joosten K, et al. ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR/CSPEN guidelines on pediatric parenteral nutrition: energy. Clin. Nutr. 2018;37:2309–2314. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.06.944. PubMed DOI
van Puffelen E, et al. Early versus late parenteral nutrition in critically ill, term neonates: a preplanned secondary subgroup analysis of the PEPaNIC multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Child Adolesc. Health. 2018;2:505–515. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30131-7. PubMed DOI
Vanhorebeek I, et al. Effect of early supplemental parenteral nutrition in the paediatric ICU: a preplanned observational study of post-randomisation treatments in the PEPaNIC trial. Lancet Respir. Med. 2017;5:475–483. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30186-8. PubMed DOI
Correani, A. et al. Oxygen saturation (SpO2) to fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio in preterm infants on routine parenteral nutrition with conventional or fish oil containing lipid emulsions. Pediatr Pulmonol. 9, 2377-2382 (2020). PubMed
Lapillonne A, et al. ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR/CSPEN guidelines on pediatric parenteral nutrition: Lipids. Clin. Nutr. 2018;37:2324–2336. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.06.946. PubMed DOI
Jochum F, et al. ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR/CSPEN guidelines on pediatric parenteral nutrition: fluid and electrolytes. Clin. Nutr. 2018;37:2344–2353. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.06.948. PubMed DOI
Sulyok E. Physical water compartments: a revised concept of perinatal body water physiology. Physiol. Res. 2006;55:133–138. doi: 10.33549/physiolres.930626. PubMed DOI
Hartnoll G, Betremieux P, Modi N. Body water content of extremely preterm infants at birth. Arch. Dis. Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2000;83:F56–59. doi: 10.1136/fn.83.1.F56. PubMed DOI PMC
Foster BA, Tom D, Hill V. Hypotonic versus isotonic fluids in hospitalized children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Pediatr. 2014;165:163–169. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.01.040. PubMed DOI
McNab S, et al. 140 mmol/L of sodium versus 77 mmol/L of sodium in maintenance intravenous fluid therapy for children in hospital (PIMS): a randomised controlled double-blind trial. Lancet. 2015;385:1190–1197. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61459-8. PubMed DOI
McNab, S. et al. Isotonic versus hypotonic solutions for maintenance intravenous fluid administration in children. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 18, CD009457 (2014). PubMed PMC
Ingvaldsen B. Væske, elektrolytter, blodgasser og infusjonsterapi (2019).
Bronsky J, et al. ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR/CSPEN guidelines on pediatric parenteral nutrition: Vitamins. Clin. Nutr. 2018;37:2366–2378. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.06.951. PubMed DOI
Marino, L. V., Valla, F. V., Beattie, R. M. & Verbruggen, S. C. A. T. Micronutrient status during paediatric critical illness: a scoping review. Clin. Nutr. 39, 3571-3593(2020). PubMed PMC
Hartman C, et al. ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR/CSPEN guidelines on pediatric parenteral nutrition: complications. Clin. Nutr. 2018;37:2418–2429. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.06.956. PubMed DOI
Stout SM, Cober MP. Metabolic effects of cyclic parenteral nutrition infusion in adults and children. Nutr. Clin. Pr. 2010;25:277–281. doi: 10.1177/0884533610368701. PubMed DOI
Nghiem-Rao TH, et al. Risks and benefits of prophylactic cyclic parenteral nutrition in surgical neonates. Nutr. Clin. Pract. 2013;28:745–752. doi: 10.1177/0884533613502813. PubMed DOI PMC
Lacaille F, et al. Intestinal failure-associated liver disease: a position paper of the ESPGHAN Working Group of Intestinal Failure and Intestinal Transplantation. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2015;60:272–283. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000586. PubMed DOI
Mutanen A, et al. Persistent abnormal liver fibrosis after weaning off parenteral nutrition in pediatric intestinal failure. Hepatology. 2013;58:729–738. doi: 10.1002/hep.26360. PubMed DOI
Burroughs AK, Thalheimer U. Hepatic venous pressure gradient in 2010: optimal measurement is key. Hepatology. 2010;51:1894–1896. doi: 10.1002/hep.23710. PubMed DOI
Castera L, Pinzani M, Bosch J. Non invasive evaluation of portal hypertension using transient elastography. J. Hepatol. 2012;56:696–703. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.07.005. PubMed DOI
Gutierrez IM, et al. Risk factors for small bowel bacterial overgrowth and diagnostic yield of duodenal aspirates in children with intestinal failure: a retrospective review. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2012;47:1150–1154. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.03.019. PubMed DOI PMC
Wang RF, Cao WW, Cerniglia CE. PCR detection and quantitation of predominant anaerobic bacteria in human and animal fecal samples. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1996;62:1242–1247. doi: 10.1128/aem.62.4.1242-1247.1996. PubMed DOI PMC
Parker P, Stroop S, Greene H. A controlled comparison of continuous versus intermittent feeding in the treatment of infants with intestinal disease. J. Pediatr. 1981;99:360–364. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(81)80318-6. PubMed DOI
Nagelkerke SCJ, et al. Standardized and individualized parenteral nutrition mixtures in a pediatric home parenteral nutrition population. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2020;70:269–274. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002528. PubMed DOI
Hay WW, Thureen P. Protein for preterm infants: how much is needed? How much is enough? How much is too much? Pediatr. Neonatol. 2010;51:198–207. doi: 10.1016/S1875-9572(10)60039-3. PubMed DOI
Morgan C, Burgess L. High protein intake does not prevent low plasma levels of conditionally essential amino acids in very preterm infants receiving parenteral nutrition. JPEN J. Parenter. Enter. Nutr. 2017;41:455–462. doi: 10.1177/0148607115594009. PubMed DOI
COMET 2020 Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials. https://www.comet-initiative.org/.