• This record comes from PubMed

Impact of foliar application of fungicides on tomato leaf fungal community structure revealed by metagenomic analysis

. 2022 Feb ; 67 (1) : 103-108. [epub] 20210923

Language English Country United States Media print-electronic

Document type Journal Article

Links

PubMed 34554392
DOI 10.1007/s12223-021-00920-x
PII: 10.1007/s12223-021-00920-x
Knihovny.cz E-resources

Fungicides are commonly used to manage plant pathogens. However, little is known about their effects on the non-target fungal communities that inhabit inside and outside the plant. These fungicides may have adverse effects on beneficial microbial communities with possible consequences for plant health and productivity. Hence, a metagenomic approach, based on the ITS2 region of fungal rDNA, was used to study the impact of foliar application of two fungicides (propineb and iprodione + carbendazim) on non-target tomato leaf fungal communities, in the context of early blight disease management. Metagenomic analysis revealed that the richness and diversity of tomato leaf fungal populations were adversely affected by the chemical treatments tested. Among the two fungicides, propineb (contact fungicide) imparted less non-targeted microorganisms than iprodione + carbendazim (systemic fungicide). In addition, all samples showed association of pathogenic genera Cladosporium, Corynespora, Pseudocercospora along with early blight pathogen Alternaria on tomato leaves that otherwise were undetected. Metagenomic studies also revealed a new mode of action for fungicides and bioagents besides their direct effect that is shifting the microbial community structure so that it provides greater resistance against the pathogen.

See more in PubMed

Abdelfattah A, Wisniewski M, Nicosia O, Schena L (2016) Metagenomic analysis of fungal diversity on strawberry plants and the effect of management practices on the fungal community structure of aerial organs. PLoS ONE 11(8):e0160470

Balin P, Stapleton A (2011) Application of an antibiotic resets the maize leaf phyllosphere community and increases resistance to southern leaf blight. Acta Hortic 905:57–62

Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, Huttley GA (2010) QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7(5):335–336 DOI

Das S, Bhattacharya S (2008) Enumerating outdoor aeromycota in suburban West Bengal India with reference to respiratory allergy and meteorological factors. Ann Agric Environ Med 15(1):105–112 DOI

Denchev CM, Denchev TT (2013) Erratomycetaceae, fam. nov., and validation of some names of smut fungi recently described from India. Mycobiota 1:63–70 DOI

Edgar RC (2010) Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26(19):2460–2461 DOI

FAO (2011) Bulletin of Statistics. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations 2:85

Hofmann T, Kirschner R, Piepenbring M (2010) Phylogenetic relationships and new records of Asterinaceae (Dothideomycetes) from Panama. Fungal Divers 43:39–53 DOI

Karlsson I, Friberg H, Steinberg C, Persson P (2014) Fungicide effects on fungal community composition in the wheat phyllosphere. PLoS ONE 9(11):e111786

Knief C, Delmotte N, Chaffron S, Stark M, Innerebner G, Wassmann R, von-Mering C, Vorholt JA, (2012) Metaproteogenomic analysis of microbial communities in the phyllosphere and rhizosphere of rice. ISME J 6:1378–1390 DOI

Leye D (2013) The life cycle of the smut fungus Moesziomyces penicillariae is adapted to the short-cycle of the host Pennisetum glaucum. Fungal Biol 117:311–318 DOI

Luo L, Zhang Z, Wang P, Han Y (2019) Variations in phyllosphere microbial community along with the development of angular leaf spot of cucumber. AMB Expr 9:76–89

Minot SS, Krumm N, Greenfield NB (2015) One Codex: a sensitive and accurate data platform for genomic microbial identification. bioRxiv 12:21–32

Muller MEH, Urban K, Köppen R, Siegel D, Korn U, Koch M (2015) Mycotoxins as antagonistic or supporting agents in the interaction between phytopathogenic Fusarium and Alternaria fungi. World Mycotoxin J 8:311–321 DOI

Perazzolli M, Antonielli L, Storari M, Puopolo G, Pancher M, Giovannini O (2014) Resilience of the natural phyllosphere microbiota of the grapevine to chemical and biological pesticides. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:3585–3596 DOI

Pinto C, Pinho D, Sousa S, Pinheiro M, Egas C, Gomes AC (2014) Unravelling the diversity of grapevine microbiome. PLoS ONE 9:e85622

Sab V, Milles J, Krämer J, Prange A (2012) Competitive interactions of Fusarium graminearum and Alternaria alternata in vitro in relation to deoxynivalenol and zearalenone production. J Food Agric Environ 5:257–261

Sahu DK, Khare CP, Singh P, Thakur MP (2013) Evaluation of newer fungicide for management of early blight of tomato in Chhattisgarh. Bioscan 8(4):1255–1259

Singh S, Gupta R, Kumari M, Sharma S (2015) Non target effects of chemical pesticides and biological pesticide on rhizospheric microbial community structure and function in Vigna radiata. Environ Sci Pollut Res 12:1–11

Tej M, Singh D, Kumar A, Sangeeta S (2013) Status of susceptible host for foliicolous fungi from North Terai forests of Uttar Pradesh India. New Phytol 220:69–81

Toju H, Okayasu K, Notaguchi M (2019) Leaf-associated microbiomes of grafted tomato plants. Sci Rep 9:17–87 DOI

Tsurumaru H, Okubo T, Okazaki K, Hashimoto M, Kakizaki K (2015) Metagenomic analysis of the bacterial community associated with the tap root of sugar beet. Microbes Environ 30(1):63–69 DOI

Tuite J (1969) Plant pathological methods-fungi and bacteria. Burgess Publ Co, Minneapolis, Minnesota, p 239

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...