This study investigated whether differences between personality styles in the processing of social stimuli reflect variability in underlying general-purpose or social-specific neurocognitive mechanisms. Sixty-five individuals classified previously into two distinct personality profiles underwent high-density electroencephalography whilst performing tasks that tap into both aspects of cognitive processing - namely, two distinct facets of general-purpose response inhibition (interference resolution and action withholding) during social information processing. To determine the stage of processing at which personality differences manifest, we assessed event-related components associated with the early visual discrimination of social stimuli (N170, N190) and later more general conflict-related processes (N2, P3). Although a performance index of interference resolution was comparable between the personality profiles, differences were detected in action withholding. Specifically, individuals expressing a wider repertoire of personality styles and more adaptive emotion regulation performed significantly better at withholding inappropriate actions to neutral faces presented in emotional contexts compared with those exhibiting stronger preferences for fewer and less adaptive personality styles and more ruminative affective tendencies. At the neurophysiological level, however, difference between the profiles was observed in brain responses elicited to the same stimuli within the N170. These results indicate that neural processes related to early visual discrimination might contribute to differences in the suppression of inappropriate responses towards social stimuli in populations with different personality dispositions.

1st Department of Neurology Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University and St Anne's University Hospital Brno Czechia

Behavioural and Social Neuroscience Central European Institute of Technology Masaryk University Brno Czechia

Institue of Psychology Czech Academy of Sciences Brno Czechia

Multimodal and Functional Neuroimaging Central European Institute of Technology Masaryk University Brno Czechia

School of Psychology College of Health and Life Sciences Aston University Birmingham UK

See more in PubMed

Aarts, K. & Pourtois, G. (2012). Anxiety disrupts the evaluative component of performance monitoring: An ERP study. Neuropsychologia, 50, 1286-1296.

Albert, J., López-Martín, S. & Carretié, L. (2010). Emotional context modulates response inhibition: Neural and behavioral data. Neuroimage, 49, 914-921.

Albert, J., López-Martín, S., Tapia, M., Montoya, D. & Carretié, L. (2012). The role of the anterior cingulate cortex in emotional response inhibition. Human Brain Mapping, 33, 2147-2160.

Berggren, N. & Derakshan, N. (2013). Attentional control deficits in trait anxiety: Why you see them and why you don't. Biological Psychology, 92, 440-446.

Bettschart, M., Wolf, B.M., Herrmann, M. & Brandstätter, V. (2021). Age-related development of self-regulation: Evidence on stability and change in action orientation. Journal of Research in Personality, 91, 104063.

Binney, R.J. & Ramsey, R. (2020). Social semantics: The role of conceptual knowledge and cognitive control in a neurobiological model of the social brain. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 112, 28-38.

Boyer, T.W., Longo, M.R. & Bertenthal, B.I. (2012). Is automatic imitation a specialized form of stimulus-response compatibility? Dissociating imitative and spatial compatibilities. Acta Psychologica, 139, 440-448.

Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Wohlschläger, A. & Prinz, W. (2000). Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: Comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues. Brain and Cognition, 44, 124-143.

Butler, E.E., Ward, R. & Ramsey, R. (2015). Investigating the relationship between stable personality characteristics and automatic imitation. PLoS One, 10, 1-18.

Catmur, C. & Heyes, C. (2011). Time course analyses confirm independence of automatic imitation and spatial compatibility effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 409-421.

Chartrand, T. & Lakin, J. (2003). Using nonconscious behavioral mimicry to create affiliation and rapporte. Psychological Science, 14, 334-339.

Colzato, L.S., Steenbergen, L. & Hommel, B. (2020). Rumination impairs the control of stimulus-induced retrieval of irrelevant information, but not attention, control, or response selection in general. Psychological Research, 84, 204-216.

Cracco, E., Bardi, L., Desmet, C., Genschow, O., Rigoni, D., De Coster, L., Radkova, I., Deschrijver, E. & Brass, M. (2018). Automatic imitation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 144(5), 453-500.

Cross, K.A., Salvatore, T., Losin, E.A.R. & Iacoboni, M. (2013). Controlling automatic imitative tendencies: Interactions between mirror neuron and cognitive control systems. NeuroImage, 83, 493-504.

Czekóová, K., Shaw, D. J., Lamoš, M., Špiláková, B., Salazar, M. & Brázdil, M. (2021). Imitation or polarity correspondence? Behavioural and neurophysiological evidence for the confounding influence of orthogonal spatial compatibility on measures of automatic imitation. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 21(1), 212-230.

Darda, K.M., Butler, E.E. & Ramsey, R. (2020). Individual differences in social and non-social cognitive control. Cognition, 202, 104317.

Darda, K.M. & Ramsey, R. (2019). The inhibition of automatic imitation: A meta-analysis and synthesis of fMRI studies. Neuroimage, 197, 320-329.

Deschrijver, E., Wiersema, J.R. & Brass, M. (2017a). Disentangling neural sources of the motor interference effect in high functioning autism: An EEG-study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 47, 690-700.

Deschrijver, E., Wiersema, J.R. & Brass, M. (2017b). The influence of action observation on action execution: Dissociating the contribution of action on perception, perception on action, and resolving conflict. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 17, 381-393.

Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135-168.

Enriquez-Geppert, S., Konrad, C., Pantev, C. & Huster, R.J. (2010). Conflict and inhibition differentially affect the N200/P300 complex in a combined go/nogo and stop-signal task. Neuroimage, 51, 877-887.

Everaert, J., Bronstein, M.V., Cannon, T.D. & Joormann, J. (2018). Looking through tinted glasses: Depression and social anxiety are related to both interpretation biases and inflexible negative interpretations. Clinical Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 6(4), 517-528.

Feuerriegel, D., Churches, O., Hofmann, J. & Keage, H.A.D. (2015). The N170 and face perception in psychiatric and neurological disorders: A systematic review. Clinical Neurophysiology, 126, 1141-1158.

Fischer, R., Plessow, F., Dreisbach, G. & Goschke, T. (2015). Individual differences in the context-dependent recruitment of cognitive control: Evidence from action versus state orientation. Journal of Personality, 83, 575-583.

Funder DC & Ozer, D.J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2, 156-168.

Gratton, G., Cooper, P., Fabiani, M., Carter, C.S. & Karayanidis, F. (2018). Dynamics of cognitive control: Theoretical bases, paradigms, and a view for the future. Psychophysiology, 55, 1-29.

Heyes, C. (2011). Automatic imitation. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 463-483.

Hinojosa, J.A., Mercado, F. & Carretié, L. (2015). N170 sensitivity to facial expression: A meta-analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 55, 498-509.

Hirsch, C.R., Meeten, F., Krahé, C. & Reeder, C. (2016). Resolving ambiguity in emotional disorders: The nature and role of interpretation biases. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 12, 281-305.

Hogeveen, J. & Obhi, S.S. (2013). Automatic imitation is automatic, but less so for narcissists. Experimental Brain Research, 224, 613-621.

Hsieh, S., Yu, Y., Chen, E., Yang, C. & Wang, C. (2020). Personality and individual differences ERP correlates of a flanker task with varying levels of analytic-holistic cognitive style. Personality and Individual Differences, 153, 109673.

Inzlicht, M., Bartholow, B.D. & Hirsh, J.B. (2015). Emotional foundations of cognitive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19, 126-132.

Jostmann, N.B. & Koole, S.L. (2007). On the regulation of cognitive control: Action orientation moderates the impact of high demands in Stroop interference tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 136, 593-609.

Kuhl, J. (2000). A theory of self-development: Affective fixation and the STAR model of personality disorders and related styles. In J. Heckhausen (Ed.), Advances in psychology, 131 Motivational psychology of human development: Developing motivation and motivating development (pp. 187-211). New York: Elsevier Science.

Kuhl, J. & Kazén, M. (2002). PSSI-Inventář stylů osobnosti a poruch osobnosti. Praha: Testcentrum.

Kungl, M.T., Rutherford, H.J.V., Heinisch, C., Beckmann, M.W., Fasching, P.A. & Spangler, G. (2020). Does anxiety impact the neural processing of child faces in mothers of school-aged children? An ERP study using an emotional Go/NoGo task. Social Neuroscience, 15, 530-543.

Langner, O., Dotsch, R., Bijlstra, G., Wigboldus, D.H.J., Hawk, S.T. & van Knippenberg, A. (2010). Presentation and validation of the radboud faces database. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 1377-1388.

Leander, N.P., Chartrand, T.L. & Bargh, J.A. (2012). You give me the chills: Embodied reactions to inappropriate amounts of behavioral mimicry. Psychological Science, 23, 772-779.

Meeus, W., Van de Schoot, R., Klimstra, T. & Branje, S. (2011). Personality types in adolescence: Change and stability and links with adjustment and relationships: A five-wave longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1181-1195.

Meyer, A. (2016). Developing psychiatric biomarkers: A review focusing on the error-related negativity as a biomarker for anxiety. Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry, 3, 356-364.

Milenkovic, S. & Dragovic, M. (2013). Modification of the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory: A replication study. Laterality, 18, 340-348.

Miyake, A. & Friedman, N.P. (2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: Four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 8-14.

Miyake, A., Friedman, N.P., Emerson, M.J., Witzki, A.H., Howerter, A. & Wager, T.D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49-100.

Nash, K., Schiller, B., Gianotti, L.R.R., Baumgartner, T. & Knoch, D. (2013). Electrophysiological indices of response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task predict self-control in a social context. PLoS One, 8(11), e79462.

Obhi, S.S., Hogeveen, J., Giacomin, M. & Jordan, C.H. (2014). Automatic imitation is reduced in narcissists. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 40(3), 920-928.

Polich, J. (2007). Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 2128-2148.

Rauchbauer, B., Lorenz, C., Lamm, C. & Pfabigan, D.M. (2021). Interplay of self-other distinction and cognitive control mechanisms in a social automatic imitation task: An ERP study. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 21(3), 639-655.

Rauchbauer, B., Pfabigan, D.M. & Lamm, C. (2018). Event-related potentials of automatic imitation are modulated by ethnicity during stimulus processing, but not during motor execution. Scientific Reports, 8, 1-15.

Schindler, S. & Bublatzky, F. (2020). Attention and emotion: An integrative review of emotional face processing as a function of attention. Cortex, 130, 362-386.

Sebastian, A., Pohl, M.F., Klöppel, S., Feige, B., Lange, T., Stahl, C. et al. (2013). Disentangling common and specific neural subprocesses of response inhibition. Neuroimage, 64, 601-615.

Sehlmeyer, C., Konrad, C., Zwitserlood, P., Arolt, V., Falkenstein, M. & Beste, C. (2010). ERP indices for response inhibition are related to anxiety-related personality traits. Neuropsychologia, 48, 2488-2495.

Senderecka, M., Szewczyk, J., Wichary, S. & Kossowska, M. (2018). Individual differences in decisiveness: ERP correlates of response inhibition and error monitoring. Psychophysiology, 55, 1-19.

Shaw, D. J., Czekóová, K., Pennington, C. R., Qureshi, A. W., Špiláková, B., Salazar, M., Brázdil, M. & Urbánek, T. (2020). You≠ me: individual differences in the structure of social cognition. Psychological research, 84(4), 1139-1156.

Specht, J., Luhmann, B.M. & Geiser, C. (2014). On the consistency of personality types across adulthood: Latent profile analyses in two large-scale panel studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 540-556.

Thierry, G., Pegna, A.J., Dodds, C., Roberts, M., Basan, S. & Downing, P. (2006). An event-related potential component sensitive to images of the human body. NeuroImage, 32, 871-879.

Tottenham, N., Hare, T.A. & Casey, B.J. (2011). Behavioral assessment of emotion discrimination, emotion regulation, and cognitive control in childhood, adolescence, and adulthood. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1-9.

von Hippel, W. & Gonsalkorale, K. (2005). “That is bloody revolting!” Inhibitory control of thoughts better left unsaid. Psychological Science, 16(7), 497-500.

Wieser, M.J. & Brosch, T. (2012). Faces in context: A review and systematization of contextual influences on affective face processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1-13.

Williams, G.A. & Kibowski, F. (2016). Latent class analysis and latent profile analysis. In L. Jason & D. Glenwick (Eds.), Handbook of methodological approaches to community-based research: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods (pp. 143-151). New York: Oxford University Press.

Zhang, R., Geng, X. & Lee, T.M.C. (2017). Large-scale functional neural network correlates of response inhibition: an fMRI meta-analysis. Brain Structure & Function, 222, 3973-3990.

Zhang, W. & Lu, J. (2012). Time course of automatic emotion regulation during a facial Go/Nogo task. Biological Psychology, 89, 444-449.