Prognostic Role of Residual Thrombus Burden Following Thrombectomy: Insights From the TOTAL Trial
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Grant support
CIHR - Canada
- Keywords
- ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, heart failure, myocardial infarction, prognosis, thrombectomy,
- MeSH
- Myocardial Infarction * complications diagnostic imaging therapy MeSH
- Shock, Cardiogenic etiology therapy MeSH
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention * MeSH
- Coronary Thrombosis * diagnostic imaging therapy MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Prognosis MeSH
- Heart Failure * diagnostic imaging therapy MeSH
- Thrombectomy adverse effects methods MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether more effective forms of thrombus removal than current aspiration catheters would lead to improved outcomes. We sought to evaluate the prognostic role of residual thrombus burden (rTB), after manual thrombectomy, in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with routine manual thrombectomy in the TOTAL trial (Thrombectomy Versus PCI Alone). METHODS: This is a single-arm analysis of patients from the TOTAL trial who underwent routine manual aspiration thrombectomy. The rTB was quantified by an angiographic core laboratory using the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction criteria and validated using existing optical coherent tomography data. Large rTB was defined as grade ≥3. The primary outcome was death from cardiovascular causes, recurrent myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, or new or worsening heart failure within 180 days. RESULTS: Of 5033 patients randomized to routine thrombectomy, 2869 patients had quantifiable rTB (1014 [35%] had large rTB). Patients with large rTB were more likely to have hypertension, previous percutaneous coronary intervention, myocardial infarction, or Killip class III on presentation but less likely to have Killip class I. The primary outcome occurred more frequently in patients with large rTB, even after adjustment for known risk predictors (8.6% versus 4.6%; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.83 [95% CI, 1.34-2.48]). These patients also had a higher risk of cardiovascular death (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.83 [95% CI, 1.13-2.95]), cardiogenic shock (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.02 [95% CI, 1.08-3.76]), and heart failure (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.74 [95% CI, 1.02-2.96]) but not myocardial infarction or stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Large rTB is a common finding in primary percutaneous coronary intervention and is associated with increased risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, including cardiovascular death. Future technologies offering better thrombus removal than current devices may decrease or even eliminate the risk associated with rTB. This, potentially, can turn into a strategic option to be studied in clinical trials. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT01149044.
Cardiology Department Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust United Kingdom
Cardiology Department Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester United Kingdom
Cardiothoracic Centre Freeman Hospital Newcastle upon Tyne United Kingdom
Department of Cardiology University of Belgrade Serbia
Division of Cardiology University of Toronto and Southlake Regional Health Centre Canada
Division of Emergency Medicine Poznan University of Medical Sciences Poland
Heart Hospital Tampere Finland
London Health Sciences Centre Canada
Population Health Research Institute McMaster University Hamilton Canada
Royal North Shore Hospital University of Sydney Australia
Translational and Clinical Research Institute Newcastle University United Kingdom
University Clinic of Cardiology Ss Cyril and Methodius University Skopje Macedonia
University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Pilsen Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT01149044