Early Identification of CKD-A Scoping Review of the Global Populations
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, scoping review
PubMed
35685314
PubMed Central
PMC9171699
DOI
10.1016/j.ekir.2022.03.031
PII: S2468-0249(22)01251-7
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- chronic kidney disease, early detection, estimated glomerular filtration rate, intervention, measurement, screening,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- scoping review MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Decisions on whether to screen for chronic kidney disease (CKD) or not remain contentious in nephrology. This study provides a global overview of early CKD identification efforts. METHODS: Guidelines for scoping reviews were followed and studies were identified by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, ISI Web of Science, and PsycINFO. Data extracted from included studies focused on the following 4 themes: study population, measurement methods, interventions used, and available policies. RESULTS: We identified 290 CKD screening and detection programs from 83 countries. Overall sample size was 3.72 million (North East Asia: 1.19 million), detection of CKD was the aim in 97.6%, 63.1% used population-based screening methods, and only 12.4% were in rural populations. Reported CKD prevalence (stages 3-5) was higher in targeted- (14.8%) than population-based studies (8.0%). Number of persons needed to screen (NNS) to identify 1 case was also lower in targeted studies (7 vs. 13). Single measurements (80%) and the combination of estimation of glomerular filtration rate with a urine test (albuminuria/proteinuria) (71.4%) were frequently used to detect CKD. Only 2.8% of studies included an intervention such as pharmacotherapy in identified cases. Policies on early identification were available in 30.1% of countries included. CONCLUSION: Methods for early CKD identification vary worldwide, often leading to wide variations in the reported prevalence. Efforts to standardize measurement methods for early detection focusing on high-risk populations and ensuring appropriate interventions are available to those identified with CKD will improve the value of programs and improve patient outcomes.
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health Ann Arbor Michigan USA
Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders The University of Adelaide Adelaide South Australia Australia
Department of Internal Medicine Edward Francis Small Teaching Hospital Banjul The Gambia
Department of Internal Medicine University of Uyo Uyo Nigeria
Department of Medicine Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology Kumasi Ghana
Department of Medicine Nazarbayev University School of Medicine Nur Sultan Kazakhstan
Department of Medicine University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada
Department of Medicine University of Calabar Calabar Nigeria
Division of Nephrology and Hypertension University of Cape Town Cape Town South Africa
George Institute for Global Health University of New South Wales New Delhi India
International Society of Nephrology Brussels Belgium
John W Scott Health Sciences Library University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada
Kidney and Hypertension Research Unit University of Cape Town Cape Town South Africa
Population Health Sciences Bristol Medical School University of Bristol Bristol UK
Prasanna School of Public Health Manipal Academy of Higher Education Manipal India
Renal Unit Department of Medicine Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital Kumasi Ghana
School of Medicine Pontificia Universidade Catolica do Parana Curitiba Brazil
Zobrazit více v PubMed
GBD Chronic Kidney Disease Collaboration Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2020;395:709–733. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30045-3. PubMed DOI PMC
Bello A.K., Levin A., Lunney M., et al. Status of care for end stage kidney disease in countries and regions worldwide: international cross sectional survey. BMJ. 2019;367:l5873. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5873. PubMed DOI
Sharma S.K., Ghimire A., Carminati S., Remuzzi G., Perico N. Management of chronic kidney disease and its risk factors in eastern Nepal. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2:e506–e507. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70281-5. PubMed DOI
Coresh J., Astor B.C., Greene T., Eknoyan G., Levey A.S. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease and decreased kidney function in the adult US population: third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;41:1–12. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2003.50007. PubMed DOI
Gansevoort R.T., Verhave J.C., Hillege H.L., et al. The validity of screening based on spot morning urine samples to detect subjects with microalbuminuria in the general population. Kidney Int Suppl. 2005;(94):S28–S35. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.09408.x. PubMed DOI
Komenda P., Lavallee B., Ferguson T.W., et al. The prevalence of CKD in rural Canadian indigenous peoples: results from the First Nations Community Based Screening to Improve Kidney Health and Prevent Dialysis (FINISHED) screen, triage, and treat program. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016;68:582–590. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.04.014. PubMed DOI
Takahashi S., Okada K., Yanai M. The Kidney Early Evaluation Program (KEEP) of Japan: results from the initial screening period. Kidney Int Suppl. 2010;116:S17–S23. doi: 10.1038/ki.2009.539. PubMed DOI
Berns J.S. Routine screening for CKD should be done in asymptomatic adults selectively. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol CJASN. 2014;9:1988–1992. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02250314. PubMed DOI PMC
Qaseem A., Wilt T.J., Cooke M., Denberg T.D. The paucity of evidence supporting screening for stages 1–3 CKD in asymptomatic patients with or without risk factors. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;9:1993–1995. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02940314. PubMed DOI PMC
Shlipak M.G., Tummalapalli S.L., Boulware L.E., et al. The case for early identification and intervention of chronic kidney disease: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference. Kidney Int. 2021;99:34–47. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2020.10.012. PubMed DOI
World Health Organization Screening and early detection World Health Organization. Updated 2021. https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/noncommunicable-diseases/cancer/policy/screening-and-early-detection
Okpechi I.G., Bello A.K., Luyckx V.A., Wearne N., Swanepoel C.R., Jha V. Building optimal and sustainable kidney care in low resource settings: the role of healthcare systems. Nephrology (Carlton, Vic) 2021;26:948–960. doi: 10.1111/nep.13935. PubMed DOI
Vanholder R., Davenport A., Hannedouche T., et al. Reimbursement of dialysis: a comparison of seven countries. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;23:1291–1298. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2011111094. PubMed DOI
Tonelli M., Dickinson J.A. Early detection of CKD: implications for low-income, middle-income, and high-income countries. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020;31:1931–1940. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2020030277. PubMed DOI PMC
George C., Mogueo A., Okpechi I., Echouffo-Tcheugui J.B., Kengne A.P. Chronic kidney disease in low-income to middle-income countries: the case for increased screening. BMJ Glob Health. 2017;2 doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000256. PubMed DOI PMC
de Jong P.E., van der Velde M., Gansevoort R.T., Zoccali C. Screening for chronic kidney disease: where does Europe go? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3:616–623. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04381007. PubMed DOI PMC
Jaar B.G., Khatib R., Plantinga L., Boulware L.E., Powe N.R. Principles of screening for chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3:601–609. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02540607. PubMed DOI PMC
Boulware L.E., Jaar B.G., Tarver-Carr M.E., Brancati F.L., Powe N.R. Screening for proteinuria in US adults: a cost-effectiveness analysis. JAMA. 2003;290:3101–3114. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.23.3101. PubMed DOI
Mani M.K. Experience with a program for prevention of chronic renal failure in India. Kidney Int Suppl. 2005;(94):S75–S78. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.09419.x. PubMed DOI
Sumaili E.K., Nseka N.M., Lepira F.B., et al. Screening for proteinuria and chronic kidney disease risk factors in Kinshasa: a world kidney day 2007 study. Nephron Clin Pract. 2008;110:c220–c228. doi: 10.1159/000167869. PubMed DOI
American Society of Nephrology ASN emphasizes need for early detection of kidney disease, a silent killer. American Society of Nephrology. https://www.asn-online.org/news/2013/ASN_COMM_ACP_Screening_Response_102213_R12.pdf Published 2013.
Garcia-Garcia G., Jha V., Tao Li P.K.T., et al. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) in disadvantaged populations. Clin Kidney J. 2015;8:3–6. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfu124. PubMed DOI PMC
Tricco A.C., Lillie E., Zarin W., et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169:467–473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. PubMed DOI
Peters M.D., Marnie C., Tricco A.C., et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth. 2020;18:2119–2126. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00167. PubMed DOI
Okpechi I.G., Caskey F.J., Gaipov A., et al. Assessing the impact of screening, early identification and intervention programmes for chronic kidney disease: protocol for a scoping review. BMJ Open. 2021;11 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053857. PubMed DOI PMC
Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD Work Group KDIGO 2012 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney Int, Suppl. 2012;3:136–150.
Levac D., Colquhoun H., O’Brien K.K. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5:69. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69. PubMed DOI PMC
Qaseem A., Hopkins R.H., Jr., Sweet D.E., Starkey M., Shekelle P. Screening, monitoring, and treatment of stage 1 to 3 chronic kidney disease: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159:835–847. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-12-201312170-00726. PubMed DOI
National Kidney Foundation (NKF) Kidney disease screening is valuable for those at risk. National Kidney Foundation (NKF). Published 2012. https://www.kidney.org/news/newsroom/nr/kidneydiseasescreeningisvaluable
Gray J.A., Patnick J., Blanks R.G. Maximising benefit and minimising harm of screening. BMJ. 2008;336:480–483. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39470.643218.94. PubMed DOI PMC
Wilson J.M.G., Jungner G., World Health Organization Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/37650 Published 1968.
Dobrow M.J., Hagens V., Chafe R., Sullivan T., Rabeneck L. Consolidated principles for screening based on a systematic review and consensus process. CMAJ. 2018;190 doi: 10.1503/cmaj.171154. E422-e9. PubMed DOI PMC
Gutierrez-Padilla J.A., Mendoza-Garcia M., Plascencia-Perez S., et al. Screening for CKD and cardiovascular disease risk factors using mobile clinics in Jalisco, Mexico. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;55:474–484. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.07.023. PubMed DOI
Tonelli M., Tiv S., Anand S., et al. Diagnostic yield of population-based screening for chronic kidney disease in low-income, middle-income, and high-income countries. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4 doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.27396. PubMed DOI PMC
Hallan S.I., Dahl K., Oien C.M., et al. Screening strategies for chronic kidney disease in the general population: follow-up of cross sectional health survey. BMJ. 2006;333:1047. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39001.657755.BE. PubMed DOI PMC
Craig J.C., Barratt A., Cumming R., Irwig L., Salkeld G. Feasibility study of the early detection and treatment of renal disease by mass screening. Int Med J. 2002;32:6–14. PubMed
Howard K., White S., Salkeld G., et al. Cost-effectiveness of screening and optimal management for diabetes, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease: a modeled analysis. Value Health. 2010;13:196–208. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00668.x. PubMed DOI
Manns B., Hemmelgarn B., Tonelli M., et al. Population based screening for chronic kidney disease: cost effectiveness study. BMJ. 2010;341:c5869. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c5869. PubMed DOI PMC
Xie Y., Bowe B., Mokdad A.H., et al. Analysis of the Global Burden of Disease study highlights the global, regional, and national trends of chronic kidney disease epidemiology from 1990 to 2016. Kidney Int. 2018;94:567–581. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2018.04.011. PubMed DOI
Johnson R.J., Wesseling C., Newman L.S. Chronic kidney disease of unknown cause in agricultural communities. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:1843–1852. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1813869. PubMed DOI
Lebov J.F., Valladares E., Peña R., et al. A population-based study of prevalence and risk factors of chronic kidney disease in León, Nicaragua. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2015;2:6. doi: 10.1186/s40697-015-0041-1. PubMed DOI PMC
Jha V., Modi G.K. eGFR testing around the world: justice, access, and accuracy. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021;16:963–965. doi: 10.2215/CJN.16001020. PubMed DOI PMC
Lamb E.J., MacKenzie F., Stevens P.E. How should proteinuria be detected and measured? Ann Clin Biochem. 2009;46:205–217. doi: 10.1258/acb.2009.009007. PubMed DOI
Norton J.M., Ali K., Jurkovitz C.T., et al. Development and validation of a pragmatic electronic phenotype for CKD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019;14:1306–1314. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00360119. PubMed DOI PMC
Delgado C., Baweja M., Crews D.C., et al. A unifying approach for GFR estimation: recommendations of the NKF-ASN Task Force on Reassessing the inclusion of race in diagnosing kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022;79:268–288.e1. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2021070988. PubMed DOI
Htay H., Alrukhaimi M., Ashuntantang G.E., et al. Global access of patients with kidney disease to health technologies and medications: findings from the Global Kidney Health Atlas project. Kidney Int Suppl. 2018;8:64–73. doi: 10.1016/j.kisu.2017.10.010. PubMed DOI PMC
Kent D.M., Jafar T.H., Hayward R.A., et al. Progression risk, urinary protein excretion, and treatment effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in nondiabetic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;18:1959–1965. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006101081. PubMed DOI
Wright J.T., Jr., Bakris G., Greene T., et al. Effect of blood pressure lowering and antihypertensive drug class on progression of hypertensive kidney disease: results from the AASK trial. JAMA. 2002;288:2421–2431. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.19.2421. PubMed DOI
Wang K., Hu J., Luo T., et al. Effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers on all-cause mortality and renal outcomes in patients with diabetes and albuminuria: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2018;43:768–779. doi: 10.1159/000489913. PubMed DOI
Jafar T.H., Schmid C.H., Landa M., et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and progression of nondiabetic renal disease. A meta-analysis of patient-level data. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135:73–87. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-135-2-200107170-00007. PubMed DOI
Palmer S.C., Tendal B., Mustafa R.A., et al. Sodium-glucose cotransporter protein-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2021;372:m4573. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4573. PubMed DOI PMC
Bakris G.L., Agarwal R., Anker S.D., et al. Effect of finerenone on chronic kidney disease outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:2219–2229. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2025845. PubMed DOI
Wheeler D.C., Stefánsson B.V., Jongs N., et al. Effects of dapagliflozin on major adverse kidney and cardiovascular events in patients with diabetic and non-diabetic chronic kidney disease: a prespecified analysis from the DAPA-CKD trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021;9:22–31. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30369-7. PubMed DOI
Wong L.L., Kalantar-Zadeh K., Page V., Hayashida G., You A.S., Rhee C.M. Insights from screening a racially and ethnically diverse population for chronic kidney disease. Am J Nephrol. 2017;45:200–208. doi: 10.1159/000455389. PubMed DOI PMC