Screw loosening is one of the most common clinical problems of dental implants. Research on the influencing factors of screw loosening is very important to prevent screw loosening. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of liquid contamination on the screw loosening. According to the contamination condition, forty-five abutment screws were divided into three groups (n = 15): no contamination, artificial saliva contamination, and mouthwash contamination. The preload and friction coefficient of the abutment screws were recorded. Then, the reverse torque values (RTVs) and settlement were measured after 3.0 × 105 and 6.0 × 105 cycles. The surface wear of the screws was analyzed. Finally, the stress distribution of the abutment screws was calculated by finite element analysis (FEA). The results showed that fluid contamination reduced the friction coefficient, increased the preload, decrease the settlement, improved resistance to screw loosening, and reduced wear on the thread surface. Appropriate antimicrobial lubrication may improve the anti-loosening performance of abutment screws and prevent excessive wear on the threaded surface.

Key Laboratory of Implant Device and Interface Science of Liaoning Province School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation Northeastern University Shenyang 110819 China

Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases of Liaoning Province School and Hospital of Stomatology China Medical University Shenyang 110002 China

See more in PubMed

Stüker RA, Teixeira ER, Beck JC, Costa NP. Preload and torque removal evaluation of three different abutment screws for single standing implant restorations. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 2008;16(1):55–58. doi: 10.1590/S1678-77572008000100011. PubMed DOI PMC

Jemt T, Laney WR, Harris D, et al. Osseointegrated implants for single tooth replacement: A 1-year report from a multicenter prospective study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 1991;6(1):29–36. PubMed

Pjetursson B, Asgeirsson A, Zwahlen M, Sailer I. Improvements in implant dentistry over the last decade: Comparison of survival and complication rates in older and newer publications. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2014;29:308–324. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g5.2. PubMed DOI

Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int. J. Oral Surg. 1981;10(6):387–416. doi: 10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4. PubMed DOI

Sahin C, Ayyildiz S. Correlation between microleakage and screw loosening at implant-abutment connection. J. Adv. Prosthodont. 2014;6:35–38. doi: 10.4047/jap.2014.6.1.35. PubMed DOI PMC

Broggini N, Mcmanus LM, Hermann JS, et al. Persistent acute inflammation at the implant-abutment interface. J. Dent. Res. 2003;82:232–237. doi: 10.1177/154405910308200316. PubMed DOI

Jung RE, Pjetursson BE, Glauser R, et al. A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:119–130. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01453.x. PubMed DOI

Khraisat A, Abu-Hammad O, Al-Kayed AM, Dar-Odeh N. Stability of the implant/abutment joint in a single-tooth external-hexagon implant system: Clinical and mechanical review. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 2004;6(4):222–229. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2004.tb00038.x. PubMed DOI

Jae-Young J, Yang DS, Jung-Bo H, et al. Influence of abutment materials on the implant-abutment joint stability in internal conical connection type implant systems. J. Adv. Prosthodont. 2014;6(6):491–497. doi: 10.4047/jap.2014.6.6.491. PubMed DOI PMC

Sun F, Wang L, Li XC, et al. Effect of surface modification on the long-term stability of dental implant abutment screws by plasma nitriding treatment. Surf. Coat Tech. 2020;399:126089. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126089. DOI

McGlumphy EA, Mendel DA, Holloway JA. Implant screw mechanics. Dent. Clin. N. Am. 1998;42(1):71–89. doi: 10.1016/S0011-8532(22)00606-1. PubMed DOI

Shilgley JE. Mechanical Engineering Design. McGraw Hill Kogaknsha Ltda; 1997.

Martin WC, Woody RD, Miller BH, Miller AW. Implant abutment screw rotations and preloads for four different screw materials and surfaces. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2001;86(1):24–32. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.116230. PubMed DOI

Dixon DL, Breeding LC, Sadler JP, McKay ML. Comparison of screw loosening, rotation, and deflection among three implant designs. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1995;74:270–278. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80134-9. PubMed DOI

Park J, Choi J, Jeon Y, Jeong C. Effects of abutment screw coating on implant preload. J. Adv. Prosthodont. 2010;19:458–464. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00595.x. PubMed DOI

Wu TT, Fan HY, Ma RY, Chen H, Zhi L, Yu HY. Effect of lubricant on the reliability of dental implant abutment screw joint: An in vitro laboratory and three-dimension finite element analysis. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2017;75:297–304. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.11.041. PubMed DOI

Xie YN, Zhou J, Wei QP, Yu ZM, Luo H, Zhou B, Tang ZG. Improving the long-term stability of Ti6Al4V abutment screw by coating micro/nano-crystalline diamond films. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2016;63:174–182. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.06.018. PubMed DOI

Elias CN, Figueira DC, Rios PR. Influence of the coating material on the loosing of dental implant abutment screw joints. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2006;26:1361–1366. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2005.08.011. DOI

Lee HW, Alkumru H, Ganss B, Lai JY, Ramp LC, Liu PR. The effect of contamination of implant screws on reverse torque. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2015;30(5):1054–1060. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3976. PubMed DOI

Mostafavi AS, Memarian M, Seddigh MA. Effect of fluid contamination on reverse torque values in implant-abutment connections under oral conditions. J. Adv. Prosthodont. 2021;13(1):65–70. doi: 10.4047/jap.2021.13.1.65. PubMed DOI PMC

Prado AM, Pereira J, Henriques B, et al. Biofilm affecting the mechanical integrity of implant-abutment joints. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2016;29(4):381–383. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4759. PubMed DOI

Nigro F, Sendyk CL, Francischone CE, Francischone CE. Removal torque of zirconia abutment screws under dry and wet conditions. Braz. Dent. J. 2010;21(3):225–228. doi: 10.1590/S0103-64402010000300009. PubMed DOI

Rathe F, Ratka C, Kaesmacher C, et al. Influence of different agents on the preload force of implant abutment screws. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2020;126(4):581–585. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.06.005. PubMed DOI

Duarte ARC, Silva Neto JP, Souza JCM, Bonachela WC. Detorque evaluation of dental abutment screws after immersion in a fluoridated artificial saliva solution. J. Prosthodont. 2013;22(4):275–281. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00941.x. PubMed DOI

Koosha S, Toraji S, Mostafavi AS. Effect of fluid contamination on the reverse torque values of abutment screws at implant-abutment connections. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2020;123(4):618–621. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.05.001. PubMed DOI

Gumus HO, Zortuk M, Albayrak H, Dincel M, Kocaagaoglu HH. Effect of fluid contamination on reverse torque values in bone-level implants. Implant Dent. 2014;23(5):582–587. PubMed

Budynas RG, Nisbett JK. Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design. 9. McGraw-Hill; 2011. pp. 845–855.

Hobkirk, J. Expert commentary on ISO 14801:2016, dentistry-implants dynamic loading test for endosseous dental implants. Switzerland 2016.

Sun F, Lv LT, Xiang DD, et al. Effect of central screw taper angles on the loosening performance and fatigue characteristics of dental implants. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. 2022;129:105036. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105136. PubMed DOI

Guda T, Ross TA, Lang LA, Millwater HR. Probabilistic analysis of preload in the abutment screw of a dental implant complex. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2008;100(3):183–193. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60177-8. PubMed DOI

Seddigh MA. Implant abutment screw loosening: A review of effective factors. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2019;13(8):6–9.

Lang LA, Kang B, Wang RF, Lang BR. Finite element analysis to determine implant preload. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2003;90(6):539–546. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.09.012. PubMed DOI

Drago CJ. A clinical study of the efficacy of gold-tite square abutment screws in cement-retained implant restorations. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2003;18(2):273–278. PubMed

Sun F, Liu XL, Luo SQ, et al. Duplex treatment of arc plasma nitriding and PVD TiN coating applied to dental implant screws. Surf. Coat. Tech. 2022;439:128449. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.128449. DOI

Kim KS, Han JS, Lim YJ. Settling of abutments into implants and changes in removal torque in five different implant-abutment connections. Part 1: cyclic loading. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2014;29:1079–1084. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3383. PubMed DOI

Jaarda MJ, Razzoog ME, Gratton DG. Effect of preload torque on the ultimate tensile strength of implant prosthetic retaining screws. Implant Dent. 1994;3:17–21. doi: 10.1097/00008505-199404000-00002. PubMed DOI

Varvara G, Sinjari B, Caputi S, Scarano A, Piattelli M. The relationship between time of re-tightening and preload loss of abutment screws for two different implant designs: An in-vitro study. J. Oral Implantol. 2020;46:13–17. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-18-00138. PubMed DOI

Alnasser AH, Wadhwani C, Schoenbaum TR, et al. Evaluation of implant abutment screw tightening protocols on reverse tightening values: An in vitro study. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2020;125(3):486–490. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.02.035. PubMed DOI

Kozlovsky A, Artzi Z, Moses O, Kamin-Belsky N, Greenstein R. Interaction of chlorhexidine with smooth and rough types of titanium surfaces. J. Periodontol. 2006;77(7):1194–1200. doi: 10.1902/jop.2006.050401. PubMed DOI

Liu J, Ouyang H, Feng Z, et al. Study on self-loosening of bolted joints excited by dynamic axial load. Tribol. Int. 2017;115:432–451. doi: 10.1016/j.triboint.2017.05.037. DOI

Sinjari B, D’Addazio G, Bozzi M, et al. Comparison of a novel ultrasonic scaler tip vs. conventional design on a titanium surface. Materials. 2018;11:2345. doi: 10.3390/ma11122345. PubMed DOI PMC

Sun F, Cheng W, Zhao BH, Lin Z. Fatigue properties of plasma nitriding for dental implant application. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2022;2:2. PubMed