Health-related Quality of Life Analysis from KEYNOTE-426: Pembrolizumab plus Axitinib Versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
35843776
DOI
10.1016/j.eururo.2022.06.009
PII: S0302-2838(22)02457-5
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Advanced renal cell carcinoma, Axitinib, Health-related quality of life, Pembrolizumab, Sunitinib,
- MeSH
- axitinib škodlivé účinky MeSH
- humanizované monoklonální protilátky MeSH
- karcinom z renálních buněk * patologie MeSH
- kvalita života MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory ledvin * patologie MeSH
- protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie škodlivé účinky MeSH
- sunitinib MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- axitinib MeSH
- humanizované monoklonální protilátky MeSH
- pembrolizumab MeSH Prohlížeč
- sunitinib MeSH
BACKGROUND: In the phase 3 KEYNOTE-426 (NCT02853331) trial, pembrolizumab + axitinib demonstrated improvement in overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rate over sunitinib monotherapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in KEYNOTE-426. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 861 patients were randomly assigned to receive pembrolizumab + axitinib (n = 432) or sunitinib (n = 429). HRQoL data were available for 429 patients treated with pembrolizumab + axitinib and 423 patients treated with sunitinib. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: HRQoL end points were measured using the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Core (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30), EQ-5D visual analog rating scale (VAS), and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Cancer Symptom Index-Disease-Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) questionnaires. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Better or not different overall improvement rates from baseline between pembrolizumab + axitinib and sunitinib were observed for the FKSI-DRS (-0.79% improvement vs sunitinib; 95% confidence interval [CI] -7.2 to 5.6), QLQ-C30 (7.5% improvement vs sunitinib; 95% CI 1.0-14), and EQ-5D VAS (9.9% improvement vs sunitinib; 95% CI 3.2-17). For time to confirmed deterioration (TTcD) and time to first deterioration (TTfD), no differences were observed between arms for the QLQ-C30 (TTcD hazard ratio [HR] 1.0; 95% CI 0.82-1.3; TTfD HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.69-0.97) and EQ-5D VAS (TTcD HR 1.1; 95% CI 0.87-1.3; TTfD HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.83-1.2). TTfD was not different between treatment arms (HR 1.1; 95% CI 0.95-1.3) for the FKSI-DRS, but TTcD favored sunitinib (HR 1.4; 95% CI 1.1-1.7). Patients were assessed during the off-treatment period for sunitinib, which may have underestimated the negative impact of sunitinib on HRQoL. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, patient-reported outcome scales showed that results between the pembrolizumab + axitinib and sunitinib arms were not different, with the exception of TTcD by the FKSI-DRS. PATIENT SUMMARY: Compared with sunitinib, pembrolizumab + axitinib delays disease progression and extends survival, while HRQoL outcomes were not different between groups.
Adelaide and Meath Hospital University College Dublin Dublin Ireland
Bell Land General Hospital Osaka Japan
Central Clinical Hospital With Outpatient Clinic Moscow Russia
Centre Antoine Lacassagne Université Côte d'Azur Nice France
Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal Montréal QC Canada
CHU de Québec and Université Laval Quebec City QC Canada
Department of Urology Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen Tübingen Germany
Dnipro State Medical University Dnipro Ukraine
Fox Chase Cancer Center Philadelphia PA USA
Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center Washington DC USA
Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre Porto Alegre Brazil
Merck and Co Inc Rahway NJ USA
Palacký University Olomouc Medical School and Teaching Hospital Olomouc Czech Republic
Russian Scientific Center of Roentgen Radiology Moscow Russia
Sumy State University Sumy Regional Oncology Center Sumy Ukraine
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT02853331