Effects on Mortality and Major Bleeding of Radial Versus Femoral Artery Access for Coronary Angiography or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data From 7 Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trials
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu metaanalýza, časopisecké články
- Klíčová slova
- hemorrhage, mortality, percutaneous coronary intervention,
- MeSH
- arteria femoralis diagnostické zobrazování MeSH
- arteria radialis MeSH
- koronární angiografie * škodlivé účinky MeSH
- koronární angioplastika * škodlivé účinky MeSH
- krvácení etiologie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- multicentrické studie jako téma MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma MeSH
- rizikové faktory MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- metaanalýza MeSH
BACKGROUND: In some randomized clinical trials, transradial access (TRA) compared with transfemoral access (TFA) was associated with lower mortality in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing invasive management. We analyzed the effects of TRA versus TFA across multicenter randomized clinical trials and whether these associations are modified by patient or procedural characteristics. METHODS: We performed an individual patient data meta-analysis of multicenter randomized clinical trials comparing TRA with TFA among patients undergoing coronary angiography with or without percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality and the co-primary outcome was major bleeding at 30 days. The primary analysis was conducted by 1-stage mixed-effects models on the basis of the intention-to-treat cohort. The effect of access site on mortality and major bleeding was assessed further by multivariable analysis. The relationship among access site, bleeding, and mortality was investigated by natural effect model mediation analysis with multivariable adjustment. RESULTS: A total of 21 600 patients (10 775 TRA, 10 825 TFA) from 7 randomized clinical trials were included. The median age was 63.9 years, 31.9% were women, 95% presented with acute coronary syndrome, and 75.2% underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. All-cause mortality (1.6% versus 2.1%; hazard ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.63-0.95]; P=0.012) and major bleeding (1.5% versus 2.7%; odds ratio, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.45-0.67]; P<0.001) were lower with TRA. Subgroup analyses for mortality showed consistent results, except for baseline hemoglobin level (Pinteraction=0.003), indicating that the benefit of TRA was substantial in patients with moderate or severe anemia, whereas it was not significant in patients with milder or no baseline anemia. After adjustment, TRA remained associated with 24% and 51% relative risk reduction of all-cause mortality and major bleeding, respectively. A mediation analysis showed that the benefit of TRA on mortality was only partially driven by major bleeding prevention and ancillary mechanisms are required to fully explain the causal association. CONCLUSIONS: TRA is associated with lower all-cause mortality and major bleeding at 30 days compared with TFA. The effect on mortality was driven by patients with anemia. The reduction in major bleeding only partially explains the mortality benefit. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero; Unique identifier: CRD42018109664.
Cardiology Department Alto Vicentino Hospital Santorso Italy
Cardiovascular Research Institute Mater Private Hospital Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Dublin
Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences University Federico 2 of Naples Italy
Department of Cardiology Isala Heart Center Zwolle The Netherlands
Department of Cardiology University Hospital of Bern Switzerland
Department of Medicine University of Ottawa Heart Institute Canada
Division of Cardiology Cardiocentro Ticino Institute Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS Rome Italy
ISAResearch Center Deutsches Herzzentrum München Technisches Universität München Germany
Population Health Research Institute McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences Canada
Quebec Heart and Lung Institute Quebec City Canada
The Duke Clinical Research Institute Durham NC
University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Pilsen Charles University Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org