Peroneal electrical transcutaneous neuromodulation in the home treatment of the refractory overactive bladder
Language English Country England, Great Britain Media print-electronic
Document type Multicenter Study, Journal Article
PubMed
36125509
DOI
10.1007/s00192-022-05359-3
PII: 10.1007/s00192-022-05359-3
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Home-based therapy, Overactive bladder, Peroneal electrical transcutaneous neuromodulation, Peroneal nerve, Urgency,
- MeSH
- Urinary Bladder, Overactive * drug therapy MeSH
- Urinary Incontinence * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Urination physiology MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this prospective, open-label, multicenter, noncomparative study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of peroneal electrical transcutaneous neuromodulation (peroneal eTNM®) using the URIS® neuromodulation system as a home treatment for refractory overactive bladder (OAB). METHODS: The patients were treated with daily peroneal eTNM® for 30 min over a 6-week period. The primary endpoint was defined as the proportion of responders, i.e., participants with ≥ 50% reduction in the average daily sum of severe urgency episodes (defined as "I could not postpone voiding but had to rush to the toilet in order not to wet myself") and urgency incontinence episodes. In addition, bladder diary variables, symptom severity (OAB V8 questionnaire), treatment satisfaction (visual analog scale), and pain perception (visual analog scale) were evaluated at baseline (BL), at week 4 (W4), and at the end of treatment (EoT). Safety evaluations included monitoring of the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs). Changes in time were analyzed using the nonparametric one-way ANOVA Friedman test for categorical variables and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for the noncategorical variables. RESULTS: In total, 40 subjects were screened and 29 were included in the full analysis set. The proportion of responders was 86% at W4 and 79% at EoT. There was a significant reduction in frequency (p<0.001), number of severe urgency episodes (p< 0.001), number of urgency incontinence episodes (p=0.001), and number of nocturia episodes (p=0.002). There was a significant improvement in the OAB V8 score and treatment satisfaction (both p<0.001). Two mild treatment-related AEs were recorded. Both patients recovered without sequelae and completed the study. CONCLUSIONS: Peroneal eTNM® proved to be a highly effective and safe method for the home treatment of OAB, providing a therapeutic response in approximately 80% of patients.
Department of Surgical Studies Medical Faculty Ostrava University Ostrava Czech Republic
Department of Urology Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark
Department of Urology University Hospital Tř 17 Listopadu 1790 708 52 Ostrava Czech Republic
See more in PubMed
Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, et al. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21:167–78. PubMed DOI
Milsom I, Abrams P, Cardozo L, Roberts RG, Thüroff J, Wein AJ. How widespread are the symptoms of an overactive bladder and how are they managed? A population-based prevalence study. BJU Int. 2001;87:760–6. PubMed DOI
Irwin DE, Milsom I, Hunskaar S, et al. Population-based survey of urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and other lower urinary tract symptoms in five countries: results of the EPIC study. Eur Urol. 2006;50(6):1306–14. PubMed DOI
Funada S, Watanabe N, Goto T, et al. Cognitive behavioral therapy for overactive bladder in women: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Urol. 2020;20(1):129. PubMed DOI PMC
Bientinesi R, Sacco E. Managing urinary incontinence in women—a review of new and emerging pharmacotherapy. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2018;19:1989–97. PubMed DOI
Ali M, Grogan S, Powell S, et al. Qualitative analysis of factors influencing patient persistence and adherence to prescribed overactive bladder medication in UK primary care. Adv Ther. 2019;36:3110–22. PubMed DOI PMC
Tilborghs S, De Wachter S. Sacral neuromodulation for the treatment of overactive bladder: systematic review and future prospects. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2022;6:1–27.
Bhide AA, Tailor V, Fernando R, Khullar V, Digesu GA. Posterior tibial nerve stimulation for overactive bladder—techniques and efficacy. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31:865–70. PubMed DOI
Krhut J, Peter L, Rejchrt M, Slovak M, Skugarevska B, Zvara P. Peroneal electric transcutaneous neuromodulation (eTNM®): a novel method for the treatment of the overactive bladder. J Healthc Eng. 2021;2021:4016346. PubMed DOI PMC
Krhut J, Rejchrt M, Skugarevska B, Grepl M, Zvara P. Peroneal electrical transcutaneous neuromodulation as a new treatment for patients with overactive bladder: an initial clinical experience. Urol Int. 2022;106(7):658–63. PubMed DOI
Notte SM, Marshall TS, Lee M, et al. Content validity and test-retest reliability of Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale (PPIUS) for overactive bladder. BMC Urol. 2012;12:26. PubMed DOI PMC
Coyne KS, Zyczynski T, Margolis MK, Elinoff V, Roberts RG. Validation of an overactive bladder awareness tool for use in primary care settings. Adv Ther. 2005;22:381–94. PubMed DOI
Peterson AC, Sehgal A, Crump RT, Baverstock R, Sutherland JM, Carlson K. Evaluating the 8-item overactive bladder questionnaire (OAB-v8) using item response theory. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37:1095–100. PubMed DOI
Wang M, Jian Z, Ma Y, Jin X, Li H, Wang K. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for overactive bladder syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31:2457–71. PubMed DOI
Iyer S, Laus K, Rugino A, et al. Subjective and objective responses to PTNS and predictors for success: a retrospective cohort study of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for overactive bladder. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30:1253–9. PubMed DOI
Te Dorsthorst MJ, Heesakkers JPFA, van Balken MR. Long-term real-life adherence of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in over 400 patients. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020;39:702–6. DOI
Ramírez-García I, Blanco-Ratto L, Kauffmann S, Carralero-Martínez A, Sánchez E. Efficacy of transcutaneous stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve compared to percutaneous stimulation in idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome: randomized control trial. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019;38:261–8. PubMed DOI
Yamanishi T, Kaga K, Fuse M, Shibata C, Uchiyama T. Neuromodulation for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms. Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2015;7(3):121–32. PubMed DOI
Lightner DJ, Gomelsky A, Souter L, Vasavada SP. Diagnosis and treatment of overactive bladder (non-neurogenic) in adults: AUA/SUFU Guideline Amendment 2019. J Urol. 2019;202:558–63. PubMed DOI
Staskin DR, Peters KM, MacDiarmid S, Shore N, de Groat WC. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation: a clinically and cost-effective addition to the overactive bladder algorithm of care. Curr Urol Rep. 2012;13:327–34. PubMed DOI PMC
Jiang J, Patil D, Traore EJ, Hammett J, Filson CP. Contemporary patterns of third-line treatments for privately insured individuals with overactive bladder in the United States. Urology. 2020;142:87–93. PubMed DOI
Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science. 1965;150(3699):971–9. PubMed DOI
Sayner AM, Rogers F, Tran J, et al. Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in the management of overactive bladder: a scoping review. Neuromodulation. 2022;S1094-7159(22):00630–4.