Cost-effectiveness of adding oseltamivir to primary care for influenza-like-illness: economic evaluation alongside the randomised controlled ALIC4E trial in 15 European countries
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
grant HEALTH-F3-2013-602525
European Commission
PubMed
36131214
PubMed Central
PMC10290610
DOI
10.1007/s10198-022-01521-2
PII: 10.1007/s10198-022-01521-2
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Cost-utility analysis, Direct cost, Europe, ILI, Indirect cost, Multi-country, Productivity losses, QALY, Tamiflu,
- MeSH
- analýza nákladů a výnosů MeSH
- chřipka lidská * farmakoterapie MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- kvalita života MeSH
- kvalitativně upravené roky života MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- oseltamivir terapeutické užití MeSH
- primární zdravotní péče MeSH
- virové nemoci * MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
- Názvy látek
- oseltamivir MeSH
BACKGROUND: Oseltamivir is usually not often prescribed (or reimbursed) for non-high-risk patients consulting for influenza-like-illness (ILI) in primary care in Europe. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of adding oseltamivir to usual primary care in adults/adolescents (13 years +) and children with ILI during seasonal influenza epidemics, using data collected in an open-label, multi-season, randomised controlled trial of oseltamivir in 15 European countries. METHODS: Direct and indirect cost estimates were based on patient reported resource use and official country-specific unit costs. Health-Related Quality of Life was assessed by EQ-5D questionnaires. Costs and quality adjusted life-years (QALY) were bootstrapped (N = 10,000) to estimate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER), from both the healthcare payers' and the societal perspectives, with uncertainty expressed through probabilistic sensitivity analysis and expected value for perfect information (EVPI) analysis. Additionally, scenario (self-reported spending), comorbidities subgroup and country-specific analyses were performed. RESULTS: The healthcare payers' expected ICERs of oseltamivir were €22,459 per QALY gained in adults/adolescents and €13,001 in children. From the societal perspective, oseltamivir was cost-saving in adults/adolescents, but the ICER is €8,344 in children. Large uncertainties were observed in subgroups with comorbidities, especially for children. The expected ICERs and extent of decision uncertainty varied between countries (EVPI ranged €1-€35 per patient). CONCLUSION: Adding oseltamivir to primary usual care in Europe is likely to be cost-effective for treating adults/adolescents and children with ILI from the healthcare payers' perspective (if willingness-to-pay per QALY gained > €22,459) and cost-saving in adults/adolescents from a societal perspective.
Centre for Family and Community Medicine Medical University of Lodz Lodz Poland
Département de Santé Publique Hôpital de l'Archet Nice France
Department of Family Medicine and Population Health University of Antwerp Antwerp Belgium
Department of Family Medicine Medical University of Bialystok Białystok Poland
Department of Public Health and Primary Care Gent University Gent Belgium
DRC Drug Research Center LLC Balatonfüred Hungary
Family Doctors' Clinic Lodz Poland
FDC Mano šeimos gydytojas Klaipeda Lithuania
General Practice and Primary Health Care at the School of Medicine University of Crete Crete Greece
Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care University Medical Center Utrecht The Netherlands
Malia Surgery Kastelli HC Heraklio Greece
RCSI Department of General Practice 123 St Stephens Green Dublin 2 Ireland
The Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences University of Oxford Oxford UK
University Institute in Primary Care Research Jordi Gol Via Roma Health Centre Barcelona Spain
Zobrazit více v PubMed
WHO surveillance case definitions for ILI and SARI. https://www.who.int/influenza/surveillance_monitoring/ili_sari_surveillance_case_definition/en/
Bilcke J, Coenen S, Beutels P. Influenza-like-illness and clinically diagnosed flu: disease burden, costs and quality of life for patients seeking ambulatory care or no professional care at all. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(7):e102634. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102634. PubMed DOI PMC
Influenza – estimating burden of disease. https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/communicable-diseases/influenza/seasonal-influenza/burden-of-influenza
Uyeki TM, Bernstein HH, Bradley JS, Englund JA, File TM, Fry AM, Gravenstein S, Hayden FG, Harper SA, Hirshon JM, et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America: 2018 update on diagnosis, treatment, chemoprophylaxis, and institutional outbreak management of seasonal influenzaa. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2019;68(6):895–902. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy874. PubMed DOI PMC
Public Health England: PHE guidance on use of antiviral agents for the treatment and prophylaxis of seasonal influenza. In: Public Health England (2019)
Li X, Bilcke J, van der Velden AW, Bongard E, Bruyndonckx R, Sundvall PD, Harbin NJ, Coenen S, Francis N, Bruno P, et al. Direct and indirect costs of influenza-like illness treated with and without oseltamivir in 15 European countries: a descriptive analysis alongside the randomised controlled ALIC(4)E trial. Clin. Drug Investig. 2021 doi: 10.1007/s40261-021-01057-y. PubMed DOI PMC
Jefferson T, Jones MA, Doshi P, Del Mar CB, Hama R, Thompson MJ, Spencer EA, Onakpoya I, Mahtani KR, Nunan D, et al. Neuraminidase inhibitors for preventing and treating influenza in healthy adults and children. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2014 doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.20141324T2. PubMed DOI PMC
Dobson J, Whitley RJ, Pocock S, Monto AS. Oseltamivir treatment for influenza in adults: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2015;385(9979):1729–1737. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62449-1. PubMed DOI
Burch J, Corbett M, Stock C, Nicholson K, Elliot AJ, Duffy S, Westwood M, Palmer S, Stewart L. Prescription of anti-influenza drugs for healthy adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2009;9(9):537–545. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70199-9. PubMed DOI
Shun-Shin M, Thompson M, Heneghan C, Perera R, Harnden A, Mant D. Neuraminidase inhibitors for treatment and prophylaxis of influenza in children: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2009;339:b3172. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3172. PubMed DOI PMC
Michiels B, Van Puyenbroeck K, Verhoeven V, Vermeire E, Coenen S. The value of neuraminidase inhibitors for the prevention and treatment of seasonal influenza: a systematic review of systematic reviews. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(4):e60348. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060348. PubMed DOI PMC
European Medicines Agency: Summary of product characteristics of Tamiflu (Oseltamivir). In: Official website European Medicines Agency
Bongard E, van der Velden AW, Cook J, Saville B, Beutels P, Munck Aabenhus R, Brugman C, Chlabicz S, Coenen S, Colliers A, et al. Antivirals for influenza-like illness? A randomised controlled trial of clinical and cost effectiveness in primary CarE (ALIC(4) E): the ALIC(4) E protocol. BMJ Open. 2018;8(7):e021032. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021032. PubMed DOI PMC
Butler CC, van der Velden AW, Bongard E, Saville BR, Holmes J, Coenen S, Cook J, Francis NA, Lewis RJ, Godycki-Cwirko M, et al. Oseltamivir plus usual care versus usual care for influenza-like illness in primary care: an open-label, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2020;395(10217):42–52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32982-4. PubMed DOI
Briggs AC, Sculpher KM. Decision Modelling for Health Economic Evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.
Turner, D., Wailoo, A., Nicholson, K., Cooper, N., Sutton, A., Abrams, K.: Systematic review and economic decision modelling for the prevention and treatment of influenza A and B. Health Technol. Assess. 7(35):iii-iv, xi-xiii, 1–170 (2003) PubMed
Tappenden, P., Jackson, R., Cooper, K., Rees, A., Simpson, E., Read, R., Nicholson, K.: Amantadine, oseltamivir and zanamivir for the prophylaxis of influenza (including a review of existing guidance no. 67): a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol. Assess. 13(11):iii, ix-xii, 1–246 (2009) PubMed
Burch, J., Paulden, M., Conti, S., Stock, C., Corbett, M., Welton. N.J., Ades, A.E., Sutton, A., Cooper, N., Elliot, A.J., et al: Antiviral drugs for the treatment of influenza: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol. Assess. 13(58):1–265, iii-iv (2009) PubMed
Butler CC, Coenen S, Saville BR, Cook J, van der Velden A, Homes J, de Jong M, Little P, Goossens H, Beutels P, et al. A trial like ALIC(4)E: why design a platform, response-adaptive, open, randomised controlled trial of antivirals for influenza-like illness? ERJ Open Res. 2018;4(2):00046–2018. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00046-2018. PubMed DOI PMC
Bruyndonckx R, Bilcke J, van der Velden AW, Li X, Hens N, Coenen S, Butler CC, Beutels P. Impact of adding oseltamivir to usual care on quality-adjusted life-years during influenza-like illness. Value Health. 2022;25(2):178–184. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.08.001. PubMed DOI
Consumer price index. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/FP.CPI.TOTL
Purchasing power parities (PPPs), price level indices and real expenditures for ESA 2010 aggregates[prc_ppp_ind]. https://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=prc_ppp_ind&lang=en
Fenwick E, Briggs A. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves in the dock: case not proven? Med. Decis. Making. 2007;27(2):93–95. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07300071. PubMed DOI
Felli JC, Hazen GB. Sensitivity analysis and the expected value of perfect information. Med. Decis. Making. 1998;18(1):95–109. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9801800117. PubMed DOI
Pieters Z, Strong M, Pitzer VE, Beutels P, Bilcke J. A computationally efficient method for probabilistic parameter threshold analysis for health economic evaluations. Med. Decis. Making. 2020;40(5):669–679. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20937253. PubMed DOI PMC
Sander B, Gyldmark M, Hayden FG, Morris J, Mueller E, Bergemann R. Influenza treatment with neuraminidase inhibitors: cost-effectiveness and cost-utility in healthy adults in the United Kingdom. Eur. J. Health Econ. 2005;6(3):244–252. doi: 10.1007/s10198-005-0297-y. PubMed DOI PMC
Wailoo AJ, Sutton AJ, Cooper NJ, Turner DA, Abrams KR, Brennan A, Nicholson KG. Cost-effectiveness and value of information analyses of neuraminidase inhibitors for the treatment of influenza. Value Health. 2008;11(2):160–171. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00241.x. PubMed DOI
Postma MJ, Novak A, Scheijbeler HW, Gyldmark M, van Genugten ML, Wilschut JC. Cost effectiveness of oseltamivir treatment for patients with influenza-like illness who are at increased risk for serious complications of influenza: illustration for the Netherlands. Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25(6):497–509. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200725060-00005. PubMed DOI
Vecoso LVZ, Silva MT, Resende MR, da Silva EN, Galvao TF. Cost-effectiveness analysis of influenza A (H1N1) chemoprophylaxis in Brazil. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:945. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00945. PubMed DOI PMC
Nakagawa N, Morikawa A, Kanazawa Y, Lai L. A cost-effectiveness analysis of neuraminidase inhibitors for influenza virus infections in an adult-outpatient setting in Japan. Value Health Reg. Issues. 2021;24:117–122. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2020.07.579. PubMed DOI
Tsuzuki S, Yoshihara K. The characteristics of influenza-like illness management in Japan. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):568. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08603-x. PubMed DOI PMC
Lavelle TA, Uyeki TM, Prosser LA. Cost-effectiveness of oseltamivir treatment for children with uncomplicated seasonal influenza. J. Pediatr. 2012;160(1):67–73 e66. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.07.001. PubMed DOI
Scuffham PA, West PA. Economic evaluation of strategies for the control and management of influenza in Europe. Vaccine. 2002;20(19–20):2562–2578. doi: 10.1016/S0264-410X(02)00154-8. PubMed DOI
Moss JWE, Davidson C, Mattock R, Gibbons I, Mealing S, Carroll S. Quantifying the direct secondary health care cost of seasonal influenza in England. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1464. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09553-0. PubMed DOI PMC
O'Brien BJ, Goeree R, Blackhouse G, Smieja M, Loeb M. Oseltamivir for treatment of influenza in healthy adults: pooled trial evidence and cost-effectiveness model for Canada. Value Health. 2003;6(2):116–125. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.2003.00213.x. PubMed DOI
Bilcke J, Beutels P. Generating, presenting, and interpreting cost-effectiveness results in the context of uncertainty: a tutorial for deeper knowledge and better practice. Med. Decis. Making. 2022;42(4):421–435. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211045070. PubMed DOI PMC
Ebell MH, Call M, Shinholser J. Effectiveness of oseltamivir in adults: a meta-analysis of published and unpublished clinical trials. Fam. Pract. 2013;30(2):125–133. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cms059. PubMed DOI
Malosh RE, Martin ET, Heikkinen T, Brooks WA, Whitley RJ, Monto AS. Efficacy and safety of oseltamivir in children: systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2018;66(10):1492–1500. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix1040. PubMed DOI