Sequential intravesical gemcitabine and docetaxel therapy in patients with nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu metaanalýza, systematický přehled, časopisecké články
PubMed
36482766
DOI
10.1097/mou.0000000000001065
PII: 00042307-202305000-00008
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- adjuvancia imunologická MeSH
- aplikace intravezikální MeSH
- BCG vakcína škodlivé účinky MeSH
- docetaxel terapeutické užití MeSH
- gemcitabin * MeSH
- invazivní růst nádoru MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lokální recidiva nádoru MeSH
- nádory močového měchýře * terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- metaanalýza MeSH
- systematický přehled MeSH
- Názvy látek
- adjuvancia imunologická MeSH
- BCG vakcína MeSH
- docetaxel MeSH
- gemcitabin * MeSH
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Shortages in intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) immunotherapy represent a challenge in the management of high-risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (HR-NMIBC). This study aimed to review the efficacy and safety of intravesical gemcitabine (GEM) and docetaxel (DOCE) for BCG-naive and unresponsive HR-NMIBC. RECENT FINDINGS: We identified six studies eligible for quantitative analysis through a systematic search according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. In the two studies in the BCG-naive setting, 1-year and 2-year pooled recurrence-free survival (RFS) were 86 and 84%, respectively. In the two studies in the BCG unresponsive setting, 6-month, 1-year and 2-year pooled high-grade recurrence-free survival (HG-RFS) were 80, 66 and 51%, respectively. Cumulative data from four studies revealed that 2.3% of patients could not complete induction therapy and 6.9% experienced treatment delay or dose reduction due to adverse events. SUMMARY: Despite the preliminary data and based on a small sample size, intravesical GEM/DOCE therapy is a highly promising combination yielding an effective and well tolerated alternative to BCG when indicated. Further large, well designed comparative studies with BCG are needed.
Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Urology The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA
Department of Urology UROSUD La Croix Du Sud Hospital Quint Fonsegrives France
Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York New York USA
Division of Urology Department of Special Surgery The University of Jordan Amman Jordan
Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health Sechenov University Moscow Russia
Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology Vienna Austria
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Burger M, Catto JW, Dalbagni G, et al. Epidemiology and risk factors of urothelial bladder cancer. Eur Urol 2013; 63:234–241.
Babjuk M, Burger M, Capoun O, et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Nonmuscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (Ta, T1, and Carcinoma in Situ). Eur Urol 2022; 81:75–94.
Malmström P-U, Sylvester RJ, Crawford DE, et al. An individual patient data meta-analysis of the long-term outcome of randomised studies comparing intravesical Mitomycin C versus Bacillus Calmette-Guérin for non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Eur Urol 2009; 56:247–256.
Cockerill PA, Knoedler JJ, Frank I, et al. Intravesical gemcitabine in combination with mitomycin C as salvage treatment in recurrent nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer. BJU Int 2016; 117:456–462.
Steinberg RL, Thomas LJ, Brooks N, et al. Multi-institution evaluation of sequential gemcitabine and docetaxel as rescue therapy for nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. J Urol 2020; 203:902–909.
Racioppi M, Di Gianfrancesco L, Ragonese M, et al. ElectroMotive drug administration (EMDA) of Mitomycin C as first-line salvage therapy in high risk “BCG failure” non muscle invasive bladder cancer: 3 years follow-up outcomes. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:1224.
Tan WS, Panchal A, Buckley L, et al. Radiofrequency-induced thermo-chemotherapy effect versus a second course of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin or institutional standard in patients with recurrence of nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer following induction or maintenance Bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy (HYMN): a phase III, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Eur Urol 2019; 75:63–71.
Meghani K, Cooley LF, Choy B, et al. First-in-human intravesical delivery of pembrolizumab identifies immune activation in bladder cancer unresponsive to Bacillus Calmette-Guérin. Eur Urol 2022; 82:602–610.
Balar AV, Kamat AM, Kulkarni GS, et al. Pembrolizumab monotherapy for the treatment of high-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer unresponsive to BCG (KEYNOTE-057): an open-label, single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:919–930.
Shore ND, Boorjian SA, Canter DJ, et al. Intravesical rAd-IFNα/Syn3 for patients with high-grade, Bacillus Calmette-Guerin-refractory or relapsed non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a phase II randomized study. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35:3410–3416.
Chang SS, Boorjian SA, Chou R, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: AUA/SUO Guideline. J Urol 2016; 196:1021–1029.
Skinner EC, Goldman B, Sakr WA, et al. SWOG S0353: Phase II trial of intravesical gemcitabine in patients with nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer and recurrence after 2 prior courses of intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin. J Urol 2013; 190:1200–1204.
Barlow LJ, McKiernan JM, Benson MC. Long-term survival outcomes with intravesical docetaxel for recurrent nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer after previous bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy. J Urol 2013; 189:834–839.
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. Bmj 2009; 339:b2700.
Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in nonrandomised studies of interventions. BMJ 2016; 355:i4919.
Barker TH, Migliavaca CB, Stein C, et al. Conducting proportional meta-analysis in different types of systematic reviews: a guide for synthesisers of evidence. BMC Med Res Methodol 2021; 21:189.
Thomas L, Steinberg R, Nepple KG, O’Donnell MA. Sequential intravesical gemcitabine and docetaxel in the treatment of BCG-naive patients with nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:supp.469.
Caruso A, Ravishankar R, VanArsdalen K, Malkowicz S. Intravesical gemcitabine and docetaxel in heavily pre-treated patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). J Urol 2020; 203:E1124.
McElree IM, Steinberg RL, Martin AC, et al. Sequential intravesical gemcitabine and docetaxel for bacillus Calmette-Guérin-naïve high-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer. J Urol 2022; 208:589–599.
Yim K, Melnick K, Mott Sarah L, et al. Sequential intravesical gemcitabine/docetaxel provides a durable remission in recurrent high risk NMIBC following BCG therapy. J Urol 2022; 207: (Suppl 5): e932.
Patel S, Collins C, Singla N, et al. Intravesical gemcitabine and docetaxel (GEMDOCE) in the treatment of BCG naive non-muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: updates from a phase 2 trial. J Urol 2022; 207: (Suppl 5): e1008.
Schmidt S, Kunath F, Coles B, et al. Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin versus mitomycin C for Ta and T1 bladder cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 1:Cd011935.
O’Donnell MA, Boehle A. Treatment options for BCG failures. World J Urol 2006; 24:481–487.
Steinberg RL, Packiam VT, Thomas LJ, et al. Intravesical sequential gemcitabine and docetaxel versus bacillus calmette-guerin (BCG) plus interferon in patients with recurrent nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer following a single induction course of BCG. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:9.e1–9.e7.
Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, et al. The side effects of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin in the treatment of Ta T1 bladder cancer do not predict its efficacy: results from a European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Genito-Urinary Group Phase III Trial. Eur Urol 2003; 44:423–428.
Pareek T, Parmar K, Sharma AP, Kumar S. Quality of life, efficacy, and safety of sequential intravesical gemcitabine + docetaxel versus BCG for non-muscle invasive urinary bladder cancer: a pilot study. Urol Int 2022; 106:784–790.
Daniels MJ, Barry E, Milbar N, et al. An evaluation of monthly maintenance therapy among patients receiving intravesical combination gemcitabine/docetaxel for nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 2020; 38:40.e17–40.e24.