The building design is a crucial factor that can be actively adjusted and optimized to prevent human and property threats in emergency scenarios. Previous research suggests that specific building layouts may significantly influence human behaviour during evacuation. However, detailed empirical data about human behaviour in various types of buildings with different layouts are still missing and only marginal recommendations from this field are reflected in actual construction practice. In this study, desktop VR technologies were employed to study human decision-making in problematic T-intersections in the context of an emergency evacuation. More specifically, we studied fundamental attributes of buildings such as the width and length of the corridors and the presence of stairs to explore how they influence the choice of the evacuation route. The space-syntax isovist method was used to describe spatial parameters of corridors, which makes the results applicable to all buildings. Behavioural data from 208 respondents were analysed using multilevel regression models. Our results support previous claims concerning the importance of specific spatial layouts of evacuation corridors because respondents systematically chose wider and shorter corridors with visible staircases as the preferred evacuation route. The present findings further promote the ongoing discussion on the design of marked evacuation routes and building design that takes human factors into consideration.

Department of Geography Faculty of Science Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

Department of Geography Ghent University Ghent Belgium

Department of Psychology Faculty of Arts Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

Interdisciplinary Research Team on Internet and Society Faculty of Social Studies Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Proulx, G. Occupant behaviour and evacuation Proulx. In Proceedings of the 9th International Fire Protection Symposium, Munich 219–232 (2001).

Fu M, Liu R, Zhang Y. Do people follow neighbors? An immersive virtual reality experimental study of social influence on individual risky decisions during evacuations. Autom. Constr. 2021;126:103644. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103644. DOI

Lin J, Zhu R, Li N, Becerik-Gerber B. Do people follow the crowd in building emergency evacuation? A cross-cultural immersive virtual reality-based study. Adv. Eng. Informatics. 2020;43:101040. doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2020.101040. DOI

Kinateder M, et al. Social influence on route choice in a virtual reality tunnel fire. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2014;26:116–125. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2014.06.003. DOI

Lovreglio R, Fonzone A, dell’Olio L. A mixed logit model for predicting exit choice during building evacuations. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2016;92:59–75. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2016.06.018. DOI

Johnson CW. Lessons from the evacuation of the World Trade Center. Cogn. Technol. Work. 2005;7:214–240. doi: 10.1007/s10111-005-0009-5. DOI

Cornwell B. Bonded fatalities: Relational and ecological dimensions of a fire evacuation. Sociol. Quart. 2003 doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2003.tb00528.x. DOI

Graham TL, Roberts DJ. Qualitative overview of some important factors affecting the egress of people in hotel fires. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2000;19:79–87. doi: 10.1016/S0278-4319(99)00049-3. DOI

Bruck D. The who, what, where and why of waking to fire alarms: A review. Fire Saf. J. 2001;36:623–639. doi: 10.1016/S0379-7112(01)00025-X. DOI

Snopková D, et al. Retracing evacuation strategy: A virtual reality game-based investigation into the influence of building’s spatial configuration in an emergency. Spat. Cogn. Comput. 2021;22:30–50. doi: 10.1080/13875868.2021.1913497. DOI

Der Heide, E. A. Common Misconceptions about disasters: Panic, the “Disaster Syndrome,” and Looting. The First 72 Hours: A Community Approach to Disaster Preparedness (2004).

Kobes M, Helsloot I, de Vries B, Post JG. Building safety and human behaviour in fire: A literature review. Fire Saf. J. 2010;45:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2009.08.005. DOI

Haghani M, Sarvi M. Following the crowd or avoiding it? Empirical investigation of imitative behaviour in emergency escape of human crowds. Anim. Behav. 2017;124:47–56. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.11.024. DOI

Haghani M, Sarvi M. ‘Herding’ in direction choice-making during collective escape of crowds: How likely is it and what moderates it? Saf. Sci. 2019;115:362–375. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.02.034. DOI

Lovreglio R, Fonzone A, dell’Olio L, Borri D. A study of herding behaviour in exit choice during emergencies based on random utility theory. Saf. Sci. 2016;82:421–431. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.10.015. DOI

Proulx G, Laroche C, Latour JC. Audibility problems with fire alarms in apartment buildings. Proc. Hum. Fact. Ergon. Soc. 1995;2:989–993.

Wood PG. The behaviour of people in fires. Fire Res. Stn. 1972;953:1–113.

Fu L, Cao S, Song W, Fang J. The influence of emergency signage on building evacuation behavior: An experimental study. Fire Mater. 2018;43:22–33. doi: 10.1002/fam.2665. DOI

Kuligowski, E. D., Peacock, R. D. & Hoskins, B. L. A Review of Building Evacuation Models; 2nd Edition. NIST Tech. Note 1680 36 (2010).

Kurkjian, S., Ebbert, S. & Farragher, T. Behind the Rhode Island nightclub fire: Series of errors sealed crowd’s fate. Bostons Globe (2003).

Hillier, B., Hanson, J. & Peponis, J. What do we mean by building function? Des. Build. Util. 61–72 (1984).

Penn A. Space syntax and spatial cognition: Or why the axial line? Environ. Behav. 2003;35:30–65. doi: 10.1177/0013916502238864. DOI

Dalton RC. The secret is to follow your nose. Environ. Behav. 2003;35:107–131. doi: 10.1177/0013916502238867. DOI

Golledge RG, Dougherty V, Bell S. Acquiring spatial knowledge: Survey versus route-based knowledge in unfamiliar environments. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 1995 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1995.tb01798.xa. DOI

Hiller, B. & Iida, S. Network effect and physichological effect: a theory of urban movement. Spat. Inf. Theory 475–490 (2005).

Duckham M, Kulik L. ‘Simplest’ paths: Automated route selection for navigation. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2003;2825:169–185. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-39923-0_12. DOI

Meilinger T, Franz G, Bülthoff HH. From isovists via mental representations to behaviour: First steps toward closing the causal chain. Environ. Plan. B Plan. Des. 2012;39:48–62. doi: 10.1068/b34048t. DOI

Bailenson JN, Shum MS, Uttal DH. The initial segment strategy: A heuristic for route selection. Mem. Cogn. 2000;28:306–318. doi: 10.3758/BF03213808. PubMed DOI

Hölscher, C. & Brösamle, M. Capturing indoor wayfinding strategies and differences in spatial knowledge with space syntax. In Proceedings of the 6th International Space Syntax Symposium (2007).

Nenci AM, Troffa R. Space syntax in a wayfinding task. Cogn. Process. 2006;7:70–71. doi: 10.1007/s10339-006-0071-9. DOI

Gath-Morad M, et al. Visibility matters during wayfinding in the vertical. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:1–15. PubMed PMC

Benedikt ML. To take hold of space: Isovists and isovist fields. Environ. Plan. B Plan. Des. 1979 doi: 10.1068/b060047. DOI

Franz, G. & Wiener, J. M. Exploring isovist-based correlates of spatial behavior and experience. In Proceedings of the 5th International Space Syntax Symposium 503–517 (2005).

De Cock L, et al. Identifying what constitutes complexity perception of decision points during indoor route guidance. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2020;00:1–19.

De Leeuw D, De Maeyer P, De Cock L. A gamification-based approach on indoor wayfinding research. ISPRS Int. J. Geoinform. 2020;9:423. doi: 10.3390/ijgi9070423. DOI

De Cock L, et al. Linking the cognitive load induced by route instruction types and building configuration during indoor route guidance, a usability study in VR. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2022 doi: 10.1080/13658816.2022.2032080. DOI

Wiener JM, et al. Isovist analysis captures properties of space relevant for locomotion and experience. Perception. 2007;36:1066–1083. doi: 10.1068/p5587. PubMed DOI

Dosen AS, Ostwald MJ. Lived space and geometric space: comparing people’s perceptions of spatial enclosure and exposure with metric room properties and isovist measures. Archit. Sci. Rev. 2016;60:62–77. doi: 10.1080/00038628.2016.1235545. DOI

Benedikt, M. & Mcelhinney, S. Isovists and the metrics of architectural space. In BLACK BOX: Articulating Architecture’s Core in the Post-Digital Era 1–10 (2019).

Vilar E, Rebelo F, Noriega P, Teles J, Mayhorn C. The in fl uence of environmental features on route selection in an emergency situation. Appl. Ergon. 2013;44:618–627. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2012.12.002. PubMed DOI

Ünlü, A., Ülken, G. & Edgü, E. A Space Syntax Based Model in Evacuation of Hospitals. in Proceedings of the 5th International Space Syntax Symposium, Delft 161 (2005).

Tong Y, Bode NWF. How building layout properties influence pedestrian route choice and route recall. Transp. Transp. Sci. 2022 doi: 10.1080/23249935.2022.2143249. DOI

Zhao, J. et al. CrowDXR-Pitfalls and potentials of experiments with remote participants. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR 2021 450–459 (2021). 10.1109/ISMAR52148.2021.00062

Kinateder, M. et al. Virtual reality for fire evacuation research. In Proceedings of the 2014 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems vol 2014, 313–321 (2014).

Feng Z, González VA, Amor R, Lovreglio R, Cabrera-Guerrero G. Immersive virtual reality serious games for evacuation training and research: A systematic literature review. Comput. Educ. 2018;127:252–266. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.002. DOI

Paradis MA, et al. Making virtual archeology great again (without scientific compromise) Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. ISPRS Arch. 2019;42:879–886. doi: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W15-879-2019. DOI

Siltanen S, et al. There is always a way: Organizing vr user tests with remote and hybrid setups during a pandemic—Learnings from five case studies. Multimodal Technol. Interact. 2021;5:62. doi: 10.3390/mti5100062. DOI

Rocha Estrada, F. J., Ruiz Ramirez, J. A., George-Reyes, C. E. & Glasserman-Morales, L. D. Students, experience using a web-based virtual reality Tool. In Future of Educational Innovation Workshop Series—Machine Learning-Driven Digital Technologies for Educational Innovation Workshop 2021 6–10 (2021). 10.1109/IEEECONF53024.2021.9733763.

Broman, K., Chorell, E. & Holmboe, M. Virtual reality and zoom in combination to visualise chemical structures and develop students ’ spatial ability during the Corona pandemic. In Utvecklingskonferensen för Sveriges Ingenjörsutbildningar, Karlstads Universitet (2021).

Seiler, R. & Widmer, D. Extended reality in the world wide web: Investigating and testing the use cases of WebVR manuals. In Proceedings of the 55th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2022).

Çöltekin A, et al. Extended reality in spatial sciences: A review of research challenges and future directions. ISPRS Int. J. Geoinform. 2020;9:439. doi: 10.3390/ijgi9070439. DOI

Herman L. User evaluation of interactive thematic 3D city models—Application of asynchronous remote testing method. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2021;8:13–20. doi: 10.5194/isprs-annals-VIII-4-W2-2021-13-2021. DOI

Hilbert DM, Redmiles DF. Extracting usability information from user interface events. ACM Comput. Surv. 2000;32:384–421. doi: 10.1145/371578.371593. DOI

Ugwitz P, et al. Spatial analysis of navigation in virtual geographic environments. Appl. Sci. 2019;9:1873. doi: 10.3390/app9091873. DOI

Sauer J, et al. Extra-laboratorial usability tests: An empirical comparison of remote and classical field testing with lab testing. Appl. Ergon. 2019;74:85–96. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.08.011. PubMed DOI

Takahashi L, Nebe K. Observed differences between lab and online tests using the AttrakDiff semantic differential scale. J. Usabil. Stud. 2019;14:65–75.

Zhang S, Park S. Study of effective corridor design to improve wayfinding in underground malls. Front. Psychol. 2021;12:1–13. PubMed PMC

Sun C, de Vries B. Width: An indispensable factor in selection of emergency exit door. Environ. Plan. B Plan. Des. 2013;40:63–77. doi: 10.1068/b37024. DOI

Hall ET. The Hidden Dimension. Doubleday; 1966.

Wiener JM, Hölscher C, Büchner S, Konieczny L. How the geometry of space controls visual attention during spatial decision making. Cogn. Sci. Soc. Proc. 2009;31:2286–2291.

Frankenstein J, Büchner SJ, Tenbrink T, Hölscher C. Influence of geometry and objects on local route choices during wayfinding. Spat. Cogn. Notes Comput. Sci. 2010 doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-14749-4_7. DOI

Wiener JM, Hölscher C, Büchner S, Konieczny L. Gaze behaviour during space perception and spatial decision making. Psychol. Res. 2012;76:713–729. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0397-5. PubMed DOI

Sadalla EK, Oxley D. The perception of room size: The rectangularity illusion. Environ. Behav. 1984;16:394–405. doi: 10.1177/0013916584163005. DOI

Ohm C, Müller M, Ludwig B, Bienk S. Where is the landmark? Eye tracking studies in large-scale indoor environments. CEUR Workshop Proc. 2014;1241:47–51.

Hölscher C, Meilinger T, Vrachliotis G, Brösamle M, Knauff M. Up the down staircase: Wayfinding strategies in multi-level buildings. J. Environ. Psychol. 2006;26:284–299. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.09.002. DOI

Brosamle, M., Holscher, C. & Vrachliotis, G. Multi-level complexity in terms of space syntax: A case study. In Proceedings of the 6th International Space Syntax Symposium 44:1–12 (2007).

Montello DR, Pick HL. Integrating knowledge of vertically aligned large-scale spaces. Environ. Behav. 1993;25:457–484. doi: 10.1177/0013916593253002. DOI

Slone, E., Burles, F., Robinson, K., Levy, R. M. & Iaria, G. Floor plan connectivity influences wayfinding performance in virtual environments. Environ. Behav.47 (2015).

Robinson ES. The psychology of public education. Am. J. Public Heal. Nations Heal. 1933;23:123–128. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.23.2.123. PubMed DOI PMC

Scharine AA, McBeath MK. Right-handers and Americans favor turning to the right. Hum. Fact. 2002;44:248–256. doi: 10.1518/0018720024497916. PubMed DOI

Xie H, Filippidis L, Galea ER, Darren Blackshields PJL. Experimental analysis of the effectiveness of emergency signage and its implementation in evacuation simulation. Fire Mater. 2011 doi: 10.1002/fam.1095. DOI

Emo B. Seeing the axial line: Evidence from wayfinding experiments. Behav. Sci. (Basel) 2014;4:167–180. doi: 10.3390/bs4030167. PubMed DOI PMC

Wiener JM, Büchner SJ, Hölscher C. Taxonomy of human wayfinding tasks: A knowledge-based approach. Spat. Cogn. Comput. 2009;9:152–165. doi: 10.1080/13875860902906496. DOI

Wickline, M. Colblindor-Coblis—Color Blindness Simulator. https://www.color-blindness.com/coblis-color-blindness-simulator/.

Kula, S. Y. Unity 360° Screenshot Capture. https://github.com/yasirkula/Unity360ScreenshotCapture.

Lesiński, K. pngquant. https://pngquant.org/.

A-frame. https://aframe.io/.

Bootstrap. https://getbootstrap.com/.

Team, R. D. C. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing vol. 2. https://www.R-project.org (2022).

Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. M. & Walker, S. C. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw.67 (2015).

Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB. lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. J. Stat. Softw. 2017;82:1–26. doi: 10.18637/jss.v082.i13. DOI

Satterthwaite FE. An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. Biometrics Bull. 1946;2:110. doi: 10.2307/3002019. PubMed DOI

Bradley RA, Terry ME. Rank analysis of incomplete block designs: I. The method of paired comparisons. Biometrika. 1952;39:324.

Dittrich R, Hatzinger R. Fitting loglinear Bradley–Terry models (LLBT) for paired comparisons using the R package prefmod. Psychol. Sci. Q. 2009;51:216–242.

Predictors of evacuation behavior: dataset on respondents' route choice and web interaction