Reference materials (RMs) are vital tools in the validation of methods used to detect environmental pollutants. Microplastics, a relatively new environmental pollutant, require a variety of complex approaches to address their presence in environmental samples. Both interlaboratory comparison (ILC) studies and RMs are essential to support the validation of methods used in microplastic analysis. Presented here are results of quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) performed on two types of candidate microplastic RMs: dissolvable gelatin capsules and soda tablets. These RMs have been used to support numerous international ILC studies in recent years (2019-2022). Dissolvable capsules containing polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polyethylene (PE), and polystyrene (PS), in different size fractions from 50 to 1000 µm, were produced for one ILC study, obtaining relative standard deviation (RSD) from 0 to 24%. The larger size fraction allowed for manual addition of particles to the capsules, yielding 0% error and 100% recovery during QA/QC. Dissolvable capsules were replaced by soda tablets in subsequent ILC studies and recovery test exercises because they were found to be a more reliable carrier for microplastic RMs. Batches of soda tablets were produced containing different single and multiple polymer mixtures, i.e., PE, PET, PS, PVC, polypropylene (PP), and polycarbonate (PC), with RSD ranging from 8 to 21%. Lastly, soda tablets consisting of a mixture of PE, PVC, and PS (125-355 µm) were produced and used for recovery testing during pretreatment of environmental samples. These had an RSD of 9%. Results showed that soda tablets and capsules containing microplastics >50 µm could be produced with sufficient precision for internal recovery tests and external ILC studies. Further work is required to optimize this method for smaller microplastics (< 50 µm) because variation was found to be too large during QA/QC. Nevertheless, this approach represents a valuable solution addressing many of the challenges associated with validating microplastic analytical methods.

Chiron AS Stiklestadveien 1 7041 Trondheim Norway

Norwegian Institute for Water Research Økernveien 94 NO 0579 Oslo Norway

RECETOX Masarik University Kamenice 753 5 625 00 Brno Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Ritchie H, Roser M. “Plastic Pollution”. Published online at OurWorldInData.org. Retrieved from: ‘https://ourworldindata.org/plastic-pollution’ [Online Resource]

Seghers J, Stefaniak EA, La Spina R, Cella C, Mehn D, Gilliland D, et al. Preparation of a reference material for microplastics in water—evaluation of homogeneity. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2022;414(1):385–397. doi: 10.1007/s00216-021-03198-7. PubMed DOI PMC

van Raamsdonk LW, van der Zande M, Koelmans AA, Hoogenboom RL, Peters RJ, Groot MJ, et al. Current insights into monitoring, bioaccumulation, and potential health effects of microplastics present in the food chain. Foods. 2020;9(1):72. doi: 10.3390/foods9010072. PubMed DOI PMC

Devriese LI, van der Meulen MD, Maes T, Bekaert K, Paul-Pont I, Frère L, et al. Microplastic contamination in brown shrimp (Crangon crangon, Linnaeus 1758) from coastal waters of the Southern North Sea and Channel area. 2015;98(1-2):179-87. PubMed

Frias J, Otero V, Sobral P. Evidence of microplastics in samples of zooplankton from Portuguese coastal waters. Mar Environ Res. 2014;95:89–95. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2014.01.001. PubMed DOI

Lusher A, Mchugh M, Thompson R. Occurrence of microplastics in the gastrointestinal tract of pelagic and demersal fish from the English Channel. Mar Pollut Bull. 2013;67(1–2):94–9. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.11.028. PubMed DOI

Huang W, Song B, Liang J, Niu Q, Zeng G, Shen M, et al. Microplastics and associated contaminants in the aquatic environment: a review on their ecotoxicological effects, trophic transfer, and potential impacts to human health. J Hazard Mater. 2021;405:124187. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124187. PubMed DOI

Lusher AL, Munno K, Hermabessiere L, Carr S. Isolation and extraction of microplastics from environmental samples: an evaluation of practical approaches and recommendations for further harmonization. Appl Spectrosc. 2020;74(9):1049–1065. doi: 10.1177/0003702820938993. PubMed DOI

Cowger W, Booth AM, Hamilton BM, Thaysen C, Primpke S, Munno K, et al. Reporting guidelines to increase the reproducibility and comparability of research on microplastics. Appl Spectrosc. 2020;74(9):1066–1077. doi: 10.1177/0003702820930292. PubMed DOI PMC

Primpke S, Christiansen SH, Cowger W, De Frond H, Deshpande A, Fischer M, et al. Critical assessment of analytical methods for the harmonized and cost-efficient analysis of microplastics. Appl Spectrosc. 2020;74(9):1012–1047. doi: 10.1177/0003702820921465. PubMed DOI

Brander SM, Renick VC, Foley MM, Steele C, Woo M, Lusher A, et al. Sampling and quality assurance and quality control: a guide for scientists investigating the occurrence of microplastics across matrices. Appl Spectrosc. 2020;74(9):1099–1125. doi: 10.1177/0003702820945713. PubMed DOI

Rochman CM, Brookson C, Bikker J, Djuric N, Earn A, Bucci K, et al. Rethinking microplastics as a diverse contaminant suite. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2019;38(4):703–711. doi: 10.1002/etc.4371. PubMed DOI

Andrady AL. Persistence of plastic litter in the oceans. Marine anthropogenic litter. Cham: Springer; 2015. pp. 57–72.

Liu M, Lu S, Chen Y, Cao C, Bigalke M, He D. Introduction: overview of analytical procedures. Analytical methods for microplastics in environments: current advances and challenges. The handbook of environmental chemistry: Springer Berlin Heidelberg Germany; 2020. p. 1–22.

Zhang Y, Kang S, Allen S, Allen D, Gao T, Sillanpää M. Atmospheric microplastics: a review on current status and perspectives. Earth Sci Rev. 2020;203:103118. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103118. DOI

EFSA CONTAM Panel (EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain). Statement on the presence of microplastics and nanoplastics in food, with particular focus on seafood. EFSA J. 2016;14(6):4501, 30.

Aliani S, Lusher AL, Galgani F, Herzke D, Nikiforov V, Primpke S, Roscher L, de Silva VH, Strand J, Suaria G, Vanavermaete D, Verle K, de Witte B, van Bavel B. Reproducible pipelines and readiness levels in plastic monitoring. In press, Nat Rev Earth Environ.

Von der Esch E, Lanzinger M, Kohles AJ, Schwaferts C, Weisser J, Hofmann T, et al. Simple generation of suspensible secondary microplastic reference particles via ultrasound treatment. Front Chem. 2020;8:169. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00169. PubMed DOI PMC

Kotar S, McNeish R, Murphy-Hagan C, Renick V, Lee C-FT, Steele C, et al. Quantitative assessment of visual microscopy as a tool for microplastic research: recommendations for improving methods and reporting. Chemosphere. 2022;306(3):136449. PubMed PMC

De Frond H, Hampton LT, Kotar S, Gesulga K, Matuch C, Lao W, et al. Monitoring microplastics in drinking water: an interlaboratory study to inform effective methods for quantifying and characterizing microplastics. Chemosphere. 2022;298:134282. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134282. PubMed DOI

Van Mourik L, Crum S, Martinez-Frances E, van Bavel B, Leslie H, de Boer J, et al. Results of WEPAL-QUASIMEME/NORMANs first global interlaboratory study on microplastics reveal urgent need for harmonization. Sci Total Environ. 2021;772:145071. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145071. PubMed DOI

Wang Z-M, Wagner J, Ghosal S, Bedi G, Wall S. SEM/EDS and optical microscopy analyses of microplastics in ocean trawl and fish guts. Sci Total Environ. 2017;603–604:616–626. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.047. PubMed DOI

Dierkes G, Lauschke T, Becher S, Schumacher H, Földi C, Ternes T. Quantification of microplastics in environmental samples via pressurized liquid extraction and pyrolysis-gas chromatography. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2019;411(26):6959–6968. doi: 10.1007/s00216-019-02066-9. PubMed DOI

Duemichen E, Eisentraut P, Celina M, Braun U. Automated thermal extraction-desorption gas chromatography mass spectrometry: a multifunctional tool for comprehensive characterization of polymers and their degradation products. J Chromatogr A. 2019;1592:133–142. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2019.01.033. PubMed DOI

Primpke S, Wirth M, Lorenz C, Gerdts G. Reference database design for the automated analysis of microplastic samples based on Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2018;410(21):5131–5141. doi: 10.1007/s00216-018-1156-x. PubMed DOI PMC

Araujo CF, Nolasco MM, Ribeiro AMP, Ribeiro-Claro PJA. Identification of microplastics using Raman spectroscopy: latest developments and future prospects. Water Res. 2018;142:426–440. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.05.060. PubMed DOI

Merkus HG. Particle size measurements: fundamentals, practice, quality. Springer, Science & Business Media. 2009;532.

Matsueda M, Mattonai M, Iwai I, Watanabe A, Teramae N, Robberson W, et al. Preparation and test of a reference mixture of eleven polymers with deactivated inorganic diluent for microplastics analysis by pyrolysis-GC–MS. J Anal Appl Pyrol. 2021;154:104993. doi: 10.1016/j.jaap.2020.104993. DOI