Evaluation of barriers to cervical cancer screening in Georgia
Jazyk angličtina Země Česko Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
37086415
DOI
10.21101/cejph.a7621
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- awareness, barriers, cervical cancer screening, education,
- MeSH
- časná detekce nádoru MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory děložního čípku * diagnóza prevence a kontrola epidemiologie MeSH
- Papanicolaouův test MeSH
- plošný screening MeSH
- zdraví - znalosti, postoje, praxe MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Gruzie MeSH
OBJECTIVES: The Cervical Cancer (CC) Screening Programme in Georgia provides insufficient coverage of the target population. The aim of the study is to identify the barriers to cervical cancer screening for women in Georgia in order to plan and implement adequate measures to increase the screening effectiveness. METHODS: The study is based on the results of a survey of 582 women aged 25-60 years (mean age 42.11 + 12.17). Respondents were selected in out-patient clinics. The questionnaire included questions related to the place of residence, ethnicity, religion, marital status, education, employment, cervical cancer awareness and screening, screening participation practices, and barriers to participation. RESULTS: The following factors reliably increase the chance of participating in the screening: residing in Tbilisi, OR = 1.84 (95% CI: 1.10-3.07); higher education, OR = 1.87 (95% CI: 1.09-3.19); being employed as a nurse, OR = 3.42 (95% CI: 1.49-7.85); receiving screening-related information from medical staff, OR = 2.43 (95% CI: 1.42-4.15); and from television, OR = 2.57 (95% CI: 1.47-4.50). The chance of participating in the screening is reduced due to incomplete secondary education, OR = 0.10 (95% CI: 0.01-0.77); single marital status, OR = 0.49 (95% CI: 0.28-0.87); employment in public service, OR = 0.39 (95% CI: 0.17-0.89); and receiving screening-related information from friends, OR = 0.26 (95% CI: 0.09-0.77). Women with higher education are undoubtedly more informed about screening, screening procedures and free programmes than those without higher education. The common barrier to participation in the screening was "fear of the manipulation-related pain" but the most frequent answer was "I'm afraid that the test will detect cancer (36.3%)." Women with a lower level of education are more likely to believe that "Pap testing is appropriate for the women who have active sexual life", and/or "have multiple sexual partners", and/or "have children," and "it is not necessary if a woman has no complaints". CONCLUSION: Screening participation among women in Georgia depends on screening availability, formal education and awareness of CC, sources of information, and employment type.
David Aghmashenebeli University of Georgia Tbilisi Georgia
Faculty of Medicine Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University Tbilisi Georgia
Georgian National Screening Centre Tbilisi Georgia
National Centre for Disease Control and Public Health Tbilisi Georgia
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Arbyn M, Weiderpass E, Bruni L, de Sanjosé S, Saraiya M, Ferlay J, et al. Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Feb;8(2):e191-e203. DOI
Wilailak S, Kengsakul M, Kehoe S. Worldwide initiatives to eliminate cervical cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 Oct;155 Suppl 1:102-6. DOI
Mali NR, Mali R. Effect of structured education on knowledge regarding prevention of cervical cancer among A.N.M. students. Int J Sci Res. 2014;3(3):610-6.
Denny L, Anorlu R. Cervical cancer in Africa. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 Sep;21(9):1434-8. DOI
Simms KT, Steinberg J, Caruana M, Smith MA, Lew JB, Soerjomataram I, et al. Impact of scaled up human papillomavirus vaccination and cervical screening and the potential for global elimination of cervical cancer in 181 countries, 2020-99: a modelling study. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Mar;20(3):394-407. DOI
World Health Organization. Draft global strategy to accelerate cervical cancer elimination [Internet]. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2019 [cited 2023 Feb 24]. Available from: https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/409225/69id02e_MA_CervicalCancer_190426.pdf.
Wilding S, Wighton S, Halligan D, West R, Conner M, O'Connor DB. What factors are most influential in increasing cervical cancer screening attendance? An online study of UK-based women. Health Psychol Behav Med. 2020 Aug 7;8(1):314-28. DOI
Ferdous M, Lee S, Goopy S, Yang H, Rumana N, Abedin T, et al. Barriers to cervical cancer screening faced by immigrant women in Canada: a systematic scoping review. BMC Womens Health. 2018 Oct 11;18(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12905-018-0654-5. PubMed DOI
Black AT, McCulloch A, Martin RE, Kan L. Young women and cervical cancer screening: what barriers persist? Can J Nurs Res. 2011 Mar;43(1):8-21.
Van Til L, MacQuarrie C, Herbert R. Understanding the barriers to cervical cancer screening among older women. Qual Health Res. 2003 Oct;13(8):1116-31. DOI
Kaida A, Colman I, Janssen PA. Recent Pap tests among Canadian women: is depression a barrier to cervical cancer screening? J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2008 Sep;17(7):1175-81. DOI
Devarapalli P, Labani S, Nagarjuna N, Panchal P, Asthana S. Barriers affecting uptake of cervical cancer screening in low and middle income countries: a systematic review. Indian J Cancer. 2018 Oct-Dec;55(4):318-26. DOI
Taghizadeh Asl R, Van Osch L, De Vries N, Zendehdel K, Shams M, Zarei F, et al. The role of knowledge, risk perceptions, and cues to action among Iranian women concerning cervical cancer and screening: a qualitative exploration. BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 11;20(1):1688. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09701-6. PubMed DOI
Buchanan Lunsford N, Ragan K, Lee Smith J, Saraiya M, Aketch M. Environmental and psychosocial barriers to and benefits of cervical cancer screening in Kenya. Oncologist. 2017 Feb;22(2):173-81. DOI
Black E, Hyslop F, Richmond R. Barriers and facilitators to uptake of cervical cancer screening among women in Uganda: a systematic review. BMC Womens Health. 2019 Aug 9;19(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12905-019-0809-z. PubMed DOI
Okolie EA, Barker D, Nnyanzi LA, Anjorin S, Aluga D, Nwadike BI. Factors influencing cervical cancer screening practice among female health workers in Nigeria: a systematic review. Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2022 May;5(5):e1514. doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1514. DOI
Robbers GML, Bennett LR, Spagnoletti BRM, Wilopo SA. Facilitators and barriers for the delivery and uptake of cervical cancer screening in Indonesia: a scoping review. Glob Health Action. 2021 Jan 1;14(1):1979280. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2021.1979280. PubMed DOI
Markovic M, Kesic V, Topic L, Matejic B. Barriers to cervical cancer screening: a qualitative study with women in Serbia. Soc Sci Med. 2005 Dec;61(12):2528-35. DOI
National Statistics Office of Georgia. Main results of 2014 general population census. Tbilisi: National Statistics Office of Georgia; 2018.
Health Care, Georgia 2021. Statistical reference. Brief overview [Internet]. NCDC [cited 2023 Feb 24]. Available from: https://test.ncdc.ge/Pages/User/News.aspx?ID=c33853f2-73bc-4bbe-841d-43bfa4fe7dca. Georgian.
Cancer in Georgia. 2015-2021. Tbilisi: National Center for Disease Control and Public Health; 2022.
Kivistik A, Lang K, Baili P, Anttila A, Veerus P. Women's knowledge about cervical cancer risk factors, screening, and reasons for non-participation in cervical cancer screening programme in Estonia. BMC Womens Health. 2011 Sep 28;11:43. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-11-43. PubMed DOI
Lee SY, Tsai TI, Tsai YW, Kuo KN. Health literacy and women's health-related behaviors in Taiwan. Health Educ Behav. 2012 Apr;39(2):210-8.
Chidyaonga-Maseko F, Chirwa ML, Muula AS. Underutilization of cervical cancer prevention services in low and middle income countries: a review of contributing factors. Pan Afr Med J. 2015 Jul 30;21:231. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2015.21.231.6350. PubMed DOI
Guliashvili G, Alibegashvili T. To improve the efficiency of Cervical Cancer Screening in Georgia (validation of Study Questionnaire). Transl Clin Med Georg Med J. 2021;6(1):4-13.
Ebu NI, Mupepi SC, Siakwa MP, Sampselle CM. Knowledge, practice, and barriers toward cervical cancer screening in Elmina, Southern Ghana. Int J Womens Health. 2014 Dec 24;7:31-9. DOI
Ahmed NU, Rojas P, Degarege A. Knowledge of cervical cancer and adherence to Pap smear screening test among female university students in a multiethnic institution, USA. J Natl Med Assoc. 2020 Jun;112(3):300-7.
Kahesa C, Kjaer S, Mwaiselage J, Ngoma T, Tersbol B, Dartell M, et al. Determinants of acceptance of cervical cancer screening in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. BMC Public Health. 2012 Dec 19;12:1093. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1093. PubMed DOI
Ampofo AG, Adumatta AD, Owusu E, Awuviry-Newton K. A cross-sectional study of barriers to cervical cancer screening uptake in Ghana: an application of the health belief model. PLoS One. 2020 Apr 30;15(4):e0231459. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231459. PubMed DOI
Islam RM, Billah B, Hossain MN, Oldroyd J. Barriers to cervical cancer and breast cancer screening uptake in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017 Jul 27;18(7):1751-63.
Agurto I, Bishop A, Sánchez G, Betancourt Z, Robles S. Perceived barriers and benefits to cervical cancer screening in Latin America. Prev Med. 2004 Jul;39(1):91-8. DOI
Moxham R, Moylan P, Duniec L, Fisher T, Furestad E, Manolas P, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, intentions and behaviours of Australian Indigenous women from NSW in response to the National Cervical Screening Program changes: a qualitative study. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2021 Jul 21;13:100195. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100195. PubMed DOI