INTRODUCTION: The aim of this paper is to first monitor the changes in the capture threshold of endovascularly placed leads for left ventricle pacing, second to compare the pacing configurations, and third to verify the effect of Steroid elution for endovascular leads. SAMPLE AND METHOD: The study included 202 consecutive single centre patients implanted with the Quartet™ lead (St. Jude Medical). The capture threshold and related lead parameters were tested during implantation, on the day of the patient's discharge, and 3, 9, and 15 months after implantation. The electrical energy corresponding to the threshold values for inducing ventricular contraction was recorded for subgroups of patients with bipolar and pseudo-unipolar pacing vectors and electrodes equipped with and without a slow-eluting steroids. The best setting for the resynchronization effect was generally chosen. Capture threshold was taken as a selection criterion only if there were multiple options with (expected) similar resynchronization effect. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The measurements showed that the ratio of threshold energies of UNI vs. BI was 5× higher (p < 0.001) at implantation. At the end of the follow-up, it dropped to 2.6 (p = 0.012). The steroid effect in BI vectors was caused by a double capture threshold in the NSE group compared to the SE group (p < 0.001), increased by approximately 2.5 times (p < 0.001). The study concludes that after a larger initial increase in the capture threshold, the leads showed a gradual increase in the entire set. As a result, the bipolar threshold energies increase, and the pseudo-unipolar energies decrease. Since bipolar vectors require a significantly lower pacing energy, battery life of the implanted device would improve. When evaluating the steroid elution of bipolar vectors, we observe a significant positive effect of a gradual increase of the threshold energy.

1st Department of Internal Medicine Cardioangiology University Hospital Hradec Kralove Hradec Kralove Czech Republic

Department of Medical Biophysics Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove Charles University Hradec Králové Czech Republic

Department of Military Internal Medicine and Military Hygiene Faculty of Health Sciences University of Defence Hradec Králové Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Abraham WT, Fisher WG, Smith AL, Delurgio DB, Leon AR, Loh E, et al. Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. (2002) 13;346(24):1845–53. 10.1056/NEJMoa013168 PubMed DOI

Schwaab B, Frohlig G, Berg M, Schwerdt H, Schieffer H. Five-year follow-up of a bipolar steroid-eluting ventricular pacing lead. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. (1999) 22(8):1226–8. 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1999.tb00604.x PubMed DOI

Kistler PM, Liew G, Mond HG. Long-term performance of active-fixation pacing leads: a prospective study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. (2006) 29(3):226–30. 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00327.x PubMed DOI

Bulava A, Lukl J. Single-centre experience with coronary sinus lead stability and long-term pacing parameters. Europace. (2007) 9(7):523–7. 10.1093/europace/eum082. [Epub 2007 May 16]. PubMed DOI

Taborsky M, Kautzner J. Summary of the 2013 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: prepared by the Czech society of cardiology. Cor Vasa. (2014) 56(1):e57–74. 10.1016/j.crvasa.2013.12.001 DOI

Strauss DG. Importance of defining left bundle branch block. J Electrocardiol. (2012) 45(5):505–7. 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2012.06.023 PubMed DOI

Hill WE, Murray A, Bourke JP, Howell L, Gold RG. Minimum energy for cardiac pacing. Clin Phys Physiol Meas. (1988) 9(1):41–6. 10.1088/0143-0815/9/1/003 PubMed DOI

Jamé S, Kutyifa V, Aktas MK, McNitt S, Polonsky B, Al-Ahmad A, et al. Bipolar left ventricular pacing is associated with significant reduction in heart failure or death in CRT-D patients with LBBB. Heart Rhythm. (2016) 13(7):1468–74. 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.03.009. [Epub 2016 Mar 4]. PubMed DOI

Yang HS, Caracciolo G, Sengupta PP, Goel R, Chandrasekaran K, Srivathsan K. Pacing polarity and left ventricular mechanical activation sequence in cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. (2012) 35(1):101–7. 10.1007/s10840-012-9686-1. [Epub 2012 May 15]. PubMed DOI

Özcan EE, Öztürk A, Özel E, Senarslan Ö, Merkely B, Geller L. The impact of the left ventricular pacing polarity and localization during cardiac resynchronization therapy on depolarization and repolarization parameters. Anatol J Cardiol. (2018) 19(4):237–42. 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2018.62357. [Epub 2018 Mar 21]. PubMed DOI PMC

Mittal S, Hammill EF, Wold N, El-Chami M. 181 Left ventricular pacing polarity and survival following cardiac resynchronization therapy. EP Europace. (2017) 19(3):iii17. 10.1093/ehjci/eux137 DOI

Mond HG, Helland JR, Stokes K, Bornzin GA, McVenes R. The electrode-tissue interface: the revolutionary role of steroid-elution. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. (2014) 37(9):1232–49. 10.1111/pace.12461. [Epub 2014 Jul 29]. PubMed DOI

Yang Z, Kirchhof N, Li S, Hine D, McVenes R. Effect of steroid elution on electrical performance and tissue responses in quadripolar left ventricular cardiac vein leads. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. (2015) 38(8):966–72. 10.1111/pace.12624. [Epub 2015 Apr 11]. PubMed DOI

Lin AC, Biffi M, Exner DV, Johnson WB, Gras D, Hussin A, et al. Long-term electrical performance of attain performa quadripolar left ventricular leads with all steroid-eluting electrodes: results from a large worldwide clinical trial. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. (2018). 10.1111/pace.13389. [Epub ahead of print]. PubMed DOI