Benefit Versus Risk Assessment of Melflufen and Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Analyses From Longer Follow-up of the OCEAN and HORIZON Studies
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
37355418
DOI
10.1016/j.clml.2023.05.004
PII: S2152-2650(23)00144-1
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Autologous stem cell transplant, Melphalan flufenamide, efficacy, multiple myeloma, pomalidomide, safety,
- MeSH
- autologní transplantace MeSH
- dexamethason terapeutické užití MeSH
- hodnocení rizik MeSH
- klinické zkoušky, fáze II jako téma MeSH
- klinické zkoušky, fáze III jako téma MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- melfalan terapeutické užití MeSH
- mnohočetný myelom * farmakoterapie MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie škodlivé účinky MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- dexamethason MeSH
- melfalan MeSH
- melflufen MeSH Prohlížeč
- pomalidomide MeSH Prohlížeč
INTRODUCTION: Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) but directionally different overall survival (OS) favoring pomalidomide (hazard ratio [HR], 1.10) in OCEAN. METHODS: These analyses further investigated prognostic subgroups impacting survival in updated data from the randomized, phase 3 OCEAN study (NCT03151811; date: February 3, 2022) and the phase 2 HORIZON study (NCT02963493; date: February 2, 2022). RESULTS: In OCEAN, subgroups prognostic for OS were age (P = .011; <65 years favored pomalidomide) and no previous autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) or progression >36 months after ASCT (P = .001; favored melflufen). Overall, 245 of 495 (49%) patients randomized had received a previous ASCT, of which 202 (82%) had progressed within 36 months following their ASCT. When excluding patients who had progressed <36 months post-ASCT (melflufen group, n = 145; pomalidomide group, n = 148), median OS was 23.6 months with melflufen and 19.8 months with pomalidomide (HR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.62-1.12]; P = .22). Among patients with triple-class refractory disease in HORIZON, patients who had progressed <36 months post-ASCT (n = 58) had a lower response rate and shorter duration of response and PFS than the remaining patients (n = 52). Safety was consistent with previous reports. CONCLUSION: These analyses demonstrate a consistent benefit for melflufen and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma who have not received an ASCT or progressed >36 months after receiving an ASCT (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03151811).
Department of Hemato oncology University Hospital Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic
Department of Hematology Erasmus MC Cancer Institute Rotterdam The Netherlands
Jerome Lipper Multiple Myeloma Center Dana Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT03151811, NCT02963493, NCT03151811