Bilateral Femoral Cannulation Is Associated With Reduced Severe Limb Ischemia-Related Complications Compared With Unilateral Femoral Cannulation in Adult Peripheral Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Results From the Extracorporeal Life Support Registry
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
Grant support
R01 HL153519
NHLBI NIH HHS - United States
PubMed
37678211
DOI
10.1097/ccm.0000000000006040
PII: 00003246-990000000-00202
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Femoral Artery MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Ischemia etiology MeSH
- Compartment Syndromes * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation * methods MeSH
- Hospital Mortality MeSH
- Catheterization, Peripheral * methods MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Risk Factors MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
OBJECTIVES: Peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) with femoral access is obtained through unilateral or bilateral groin cannulation. Whether one cannulation strategy is associated with a lower risk for limb ischemia remains unknown. We aim to assess if one strategy is preferable. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study based on the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry. SETTING: ECMO centers worldwide included in the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry. PATIENTS: All adult patients (≥ 18 yr) who received peripheral venoarterial ECMO with femoral access and were included from 2014 to 2020. INTERVENTIONS: Unilateral or bilateral femoral cannulation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was the occurrence of limb ischemia defined as a composite endpoint including the need for a distal perfusion cannula (DPC) after 6 hours from implantation, compartment syndrome/fasciotomy, amputation, revascularization, and thrombectomy. Secondary endpoints included bleeding at the peripheral cannulation site, need for vessel repair, vessel repair after decannulation, and in-hospital death. Propensity score matching was performed to account for confounders. Overall, 19,093 patients underwent peripheral venoarterial ECMO through unilateral ( n = 11,965) or bilateral ( n = 7,128) femoral cannulation. Limb ischemia requiring any intervention was not different between both groups (bilateral vs unilateral: odds ratio [OR], 0.92; 95% CI, 0.82-1.02). However, there was a lower rate of compartment syndrome/fasciotomy in the bilateral group (bilateral vs unilateral: OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.66-0.97). Bilateral cannulation was also associated with lower odds of cannulation site bleeding (bilateral vs unilateral: OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.76-0.99), vessel repair (bilateral vs unilateral: OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.38-0.79), and in-hospital mortality (bilateral vs unilateral: OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.81-0.91) compared with unilateral cannulation. These findings were unchanged after propensity matching. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed no risk reduction for overall limb ischemia-related events requiring DPC after 6 hours when comparing bilateral to unilateral femoral cannulation in peripheral venoarterial ECMO. However, bilateral cannulation was associated with a reduced risk for compartment syndrome/fasciotomy, lower rates of bleeding and vessel repair during ECMO, and lower in-hospital mortality.
Cardiothoracic Intensive Care National University Health System Singapore
Cardiothoracic Surgery Department of Surgery University of Utah School of Medicine Salt Lake City UT
Department of Cardiac Surgery Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf Germany
Department of Cardiac Surgery Vienna Medical University Vienna Austria
Department of Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht Maastricht The Netherlands
Department of Critical Care Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London United Kingdom
Department of Intensive Care Hopital Erasme Université Libre de Bruxelles Brussels Belgium
Department of UOC Anestesia e Rianimazione 2 Foundation IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Pavia Italy
Emergency Medicine Department of Surgery University of Utah School of Medicine Salt Lake City UT
See more in PubMed
Whitman GJ: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for the treatment of postcardiotomy shock. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017; 153:95–101
Cheng R, Hachamovitch R, Kittleson M, et al.: Complications of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for treatment of cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest: A meta-analysis of 1,866 adult patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014; 97:610–616
Zangrillo A, Landoni G, Biondi-Zoccai G, et al.: A meta-analysis of complications and mortality of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Crit Care Resusc. 2013; 15:172–178
Grzebień A, Chabowski M, Malinowski M, et al.: Analysis of selected factors determining quality of life in patients after lower limb amputation- a review article. Pol Przegl Chir. 2017; 89:57–61
Bonicolini E, Martucci G, Simons J, et al.: Limb ischemia in peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A narrative review of incidence, prevention, monitoring, and treatment. Crit Care. 2019; 23:266
Juo YY, Skancke M, Sanaiha Y, et al.: Efficacy of distal perfusion cannulae in preventing limb ischemia during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Artif Organs. 2017; 41:E263–E273
Extracorporeal Life Support Organization: Registry Dashboard. 2021. Available at: https://www.elso.org/Registry/ELSOLiveRegistryDashboard.aspx . Accessed November 22, 2021
Extracorporeal Life Support Organization: ELSO Registry Data Definitions. 2021. Available at: https://www.elso.org/Portals/0/Files/PDF/ELSO%20Registry%20Data%20Definitions%2001_13_2021.pdf . Accessed November 22, 2021
Carpenter JR, Kenward MG, White IR: Sensitivity analysis after multiple imputation under missing at random: A weighting approach. Stat Methods Med Res. 2007; 16:259–275
Mitra R, Reiter JP: A comparison of two methods of estimating propensity scores after multiple imputation. Stat Methods Med Res. 2016; 25:188–204
Rubin DB, Schenker N: Multiple imputation in health-care databases: An overview and some applications. Stat Med. 1991; 10:585–598
Zhao P, Su X, Ge T, et al.: Propensity score and proximity matching using random forest. Contemp Clin Trials. 2016; 47:85–92
Extracorporeal Life Support Organization: ECLS Registry Report April 2021. 2021. Available at: https://www.elso.org/Registry/Statistics/InternationalSummary.aspx . Accessed November 22, 2021
Aziz F, Brehm CE, El-Banyosy A, et al.: Arterial complications in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation via femoral cannulation. Ann Vasc Surg. 2014; 28:178–183
Bisdas T, Beutel G, Warnecke G, et al.: Vascular complications in patients undergoing femoral cannulation for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011; 92:626–631
Lamb KM, DiMuzio PJ, Johnson A, et al.: Arterial protocol including prophylactic distal perfusion catheter decreases limb ischemia complications in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Vasc Surg. 2017; 65:1074–1079
Ma RW, Huilgol RL, Granger E, et al.: Does a distal perfusion cannula reduce ischaemic complications of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation? ANZ J Surg. 2016; 86:1002–1006
Papadopoulos N, Marinos S, El-Sayed Ahmad A, et al.: Risk factors associated with adverse outcome following extracorporeal life support: Analysis from 360 consecutive patients. Perfusion. 2015; 30:284–290
Vallabhajosyula P, Kramer M, Lazar S, et al.: Lower-extremity complications with femoral extracorporeal life support. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016; 151:1738–1744
Wong JK, Smith TN, Pitcher HT, et al.: Cerebral and lower limb near-infrared spectroscopy in adults on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Artif Organs. 2012; 36:659–667
Boron WF, Boulpaep EL: Medical Physiology: A Cellular and Molecular Approach. Second Edition. Philadelphia, PA, Saunders/Elsevier, 2012
Hartsock LA, O’Farrell D, Seaber AV, et al.: Effect of increased compartment pressure on the microcirculation of skeletal muscle. Microsurgery. 1998; 18:67–71
Alshakhas M, Alatel A: Well leg compartment syndrome postorthognathic surgery under hypotensive anesthesia and reverse Trendelenburg position: A case report and literature review. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021; 25:417–420
Mumtaz FH, Chew H, Gelister JS: Lower limb compartment syndrome associated with the lithotomy position: Concepts and perspectives for the urologist. BJU Int. 2002; 90:792–799
Son AY, Khanh LN, Joung HS, et al.: Limb ischemia and bleeding in patients requiring venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Vasc Surg. 2021; 73:593–600
Smith A, Hardison D, Bridges B, et al.: Red blood cell transfusion volume and mortality among patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Perfusion. 2013; 28:54–60
Murphy DA, Hockings LE, Andrews RK, et al.: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation—hemostatic complications. Transfus Med Rev. 2015; 29:90–101
Ostermann M, Connor M Jr, Kashani K: Continuous renal replacement therapy during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: Why, when and how? Curr Opin Crit Care. 2018; 24:493–503
Dufour N, Radjou A, Thuong M: Hemolysis and plasma free hemoglobin during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support: From clinical implications to laboratory details. ASAIO J. 2020; 66:239–246
Gulkarov I, Bobka T, Elmously A, et al.: The effect of acute limb ischemia on mortality in patients undergoing femoral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Ann Vasc Surg. 2020; 62:318–325
Tanaka D, Hirose H, Cavarocchi N, et al.: The impact of vascular complications on survival of patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016; 101:1729–1734
Yau P, Xia Y, Shariff S, et al.: Factors associated with ipsilateral limb ischemia in patients undergoing femoral cannulation extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Ann Vasc Surg. 2019; 54:60–65
Blakeslee-Carter J, Shao C, LaGrone R, et al.: Vascular complications based on mode of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Vasc Surg. 2022; 75:2037–2046.e2