BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of rejection after uterus transplantation is based on histopathological examination of ectocervical biopsies. Inflammation at the stromal-epithelial interface is the backbone of the histopathological classification proposed by our group in 2017. However, the reproducibility of this grading scheme has not been tested, and it is unclear whether it covers the full morphological spectrum of rejection. METHODS: We present a multicenter study in which 5 pathologists from 4 uterus transplantation centers performed 2 rounds of grading on 145 and 48 cervical biopsies, respectively. Three of the centers provided biopsies. Additionally, the presence of perivascular stromal inflammation was recorded. During discussions after the first round, further histological lesions (venous endothelial inflammation and apoptosis) were identified for closer evaluation and added to the panel of lesions to score in the second round. All participants completed a questionnaire to explore current practices in handling and reporting uterus transplant biopsies. RESULTS: Cervical biopsies were commonly performed in all centers to monitor rejection. Intraobserver reproducibility of rejection grading (performed by 1 rater) was excellent, whereas interobserver reproducibility was moderate and did not improve in the second round. Reproducibility of perivascular stromal inflammation was moderate but unsatisfactory for venous endothelial inflammation and apoptosis. All lesions were more frequent in, but not restricted to, biopsies with rejection patterns. CONCLUSIONS: Grading of rejection in cervical biopsies is reproducible and applicable to biopsies from different centers. Diagnosis of rejection may be improved by adding further histological lesions to the grading system; however, lesions require rigorous consensus definition.

Clinical and Transplant Pathology Department Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czech Republic

Department of Anatomic Pathology Cleveland Clinic Cleveland OH

Department of Clinical Pathology Sahlgrenska University Hospital Region Västra Götaland Gothenburg Sweden

Department of Laboratory Medicine Institute of Biomedicine Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Sweden

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Institute of Clinical Sciences Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden

Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology University Hospital Tübingen Tübingen Germany

See more in PubMed

Herlin M, Bjorn AM, Rasmussen M, et al. . Prevalence and patient characteristics of Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: a nationwide registry-based study. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:2384–2390. PubMed

Sallee C, Margueritte F, Marquet P, et al. . Uterine factor infertility, a systematic review. J Clin Med. 2022;11:4907. PubMed PMC

Brannstrom M, Belfort MA, Ayoubi JM. Uterus transplantation worldwide: clinical activities and outcomes. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2021;26:616–626. PubMed

Stewart S, Winters GL, Fishbein MC, et al. . Revision of the 1990 working formulation for the standardization of nomenclature in the diagnosis of heart rejection. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005;24:1710–1720. PubMed

Cendales LC, Kanitakis J, Schneeberger S, et al. . The Banff 2007 working classification of skin-containing composite tissue allograft pathology. Am J Transplant. 2008;8:1396–1400. PubMed

Demetris AJ, Bellamy C, Hubscher SG, et al. . 2016 comprehensive update of the Banff working group on liver allograft pathology: introduction of antibody-mediated rejection. Am J Transplant. 2016;16:2816–2835. PubMed

Loupy A, Haas M, Roufosse C, et al. . The Banff 2019 kidney meeting report (I): updates on and clarification of criteria for T cell- and antibody-mediated rejection. Am J Transplant. 2020;20:2318–2331. PubMed PMC

Racusen LC, Solez K, Colvin RB, et al. . The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int. 1999;55:713–723. PubMed

Mengel M, Sis B, Halloran PF. SWOT analysis of Banff: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of the international Banff consensus process and classification system for renal allograft pathology. Am J Transplant. 2007;7:2221–2226. PubMed

Mengel M, Loupy A, Haas M, et al. . Banff 2019 meeting report: molecular diagnostics in solid organ transplantation-consensus for the Banff Human Organ Transplant (B-HOT) gene panel and open source multicenter validation. Am J Transplant. 2020;20:2305–2317. PubMed PMC

Furness PN, Taub N; Convergence of European Renal Transplant Pathology Assessment Procedures (CERTPAP) Project. International variation in the interpretation of renal transplant biopsies: report of the CERTPAP Project. Kidney Int. 2001;60:1998–2012. PubMed

Furness PN, Taub N, Assmann KJ, et al. . International variation in histologic grading is large, and persistent feedback does not improve reproducibility. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27:805–810. PubMed

Hubscher SG, Feng S, Gouw ASH, et al. . Standardizing the histological assessment of late posttransplantation biopsies from pediatric liver allograft recipients. Liver Transpl. 2022;28:1475–1489. PubMed

Mölne J, Broecker V, Ekberg J, et al. . Monitoring of human uterus transplantation with cervical biopsies: a provisional scoring system for rejection. Am J Transplant. 2017;17:1628–1636. PubMed

Johannesson L, Kvarnstrom N, Mölne J, et al. . Uterus transplantation trial: 1-year outcome. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:199–204. PubMed

Broecker V, Brännstrom M, Ekberg J, et al. . Uterus transplantation: histological findings in explants at elective hysterectomy. Am J Transplant. 2021;21:798–808. PubMed

Agarwal A, Johannesson L, Findeis SK, et al. . Clinicopathological analysis of uterine allografts including proposed scoring of ischemia reperfusion injury and T-cell-mediated rejection—Dallas uterus transplant study: a pilot study. Transplantation. 2022;106:167–177. PubMed

Brannstrom M, Tullius SG, Brucker S, et al. . Registry of the International Society of Uterus Transplantation: first report. Transplantation. 2023;107:10–17. PubMed

Brucker SY, Strowitzki T, Taran FA, et al. . Living-donor uterus transplantation: pre-, intra-, and postoperative parameters relevant to surgical success, pregnancy, and obstetrics with live births. J Clin Med. 2020;9:2485. PubMed PMC

Brannstrom M, Dahm-Kahler P, Kvarnstrom N, et al. . Reproductive, obstetric, and long-term health outcome after uterus transplantation: results of the first clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2022;118:576–585. PubMed

Fronek J, Kristek J, Chlupac J, et al. . Human uterus transplantation from living and deceased donors: the interim results of the first 10 cases of the Czech trial. J Clin Med. 2021;10:586. PubMed PMC

Angelini A, Andersen CB, Bartoloni G, et al. . A web-based pilot study of inter-pathologist reproducibility using the ISHLT 2004 working formulation for biopsy diagnosis of cardiac allograft rejection: the European experience. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011;30:1214–1220. PubMed

Hayes AF, Krippendorff K. Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Commun Methods Meas. 2007;1:77–89.

Krippendorff K. Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. 3rd ed. SAGE; 2013.

Chen Y, Zee J, Smith A, et al. . Assessment of a computerized quantitative quality control tool for whole slide images of kidney biopsies. J Pathol. 2021;253:268–278. PubMed PMC

Royal V, Zee J, Liu Q, et al. . Ultrastructural characterization of proteinuric patients predicts clinical outcomes. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020;31:841–854. PubMed PMC

Gwet KL. Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability. 4th ed. Advanced Analytics, LLC; 2014:410.

Wongpakaran N, Wongpakaran T, Wedding D, et al. . A comparison of Cohen’s kappa and Gwet’s AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:61. PubMed PMC

Brannstrom M, Johannesson L, Bokstrom H, et al. . Livebirth after uterus transplantation. Lancet. 2015;385:607–616. PubMed

Hamidian Jahromi A, Horen SR, Johannesson L. Plasma cell-free DNA as a novel method for early detection of acute rejection in uterine transplant. Exp Clin Transplant. 2022;20:440–441. PubMed

Bhorade SM, Husain AN, Liao C, et al. . Interobserver variability in grading transbronchial lung biopsy specimens after lung transplantation. Chest. 2013;143:1717–1724. PubMed

Rosales IA, Foreman RK, DeFazio M, et al. . Systematic pathological component scores for skin-containing vascularized composite allografts. Vasc Compos Allotransplant. 2018;3:62–74.

Kreft A, Mottok A, Mesteri I, et al. ; Gastrointestinal Pathology Group of the German-Austrian-Swiss GvHD Consortium. Consensus diagnostic histopathological criteria for acute gastrointestinal graft versus host disease improve interobserver reproducibility. Virchows Arch. 2015;467:255–263. PubMed