The short version of the Sexual Distress Scale (SDS-3): Measurement invariance across countries, gender identities, and sexual orientations
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Španělsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
38706570
PubMed Central
PMC11067538
DOI
10.1016/j.ijchp.2024.100461
PII: S1697-2600(24)00026-7
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), International sex survey, Psychometric analysis, Sexual distress,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: The three-item Sexual Distress Scale (SDS-3) has been frequently used to assess distress related to sexuality in public health surveys and research on sexual wellbeing. However, its psychometric properties and measurement invariance across cultural, gender and sexual subgroups have not yet been examined. This multinational study aimed to validate the SDS-3 and test its psychometric properties, including measurement invariance across language, country, gender identity, and sexual orientation groups. METHODS: We used global survey data from 82,243 individuals (Mean age=32.39 years; 40.3 % men, 57.0 % women, 2.8 % non-binary, and 0.6 % other genders) participating in the International Sexual Survey (ISS; https://internationalsexsurvey.org/) across 42 countries and 26 languages. Participants completed the SDS-3, as well as questions regarding sociodemographic characteristics, including gender identity and sexual orientation. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported a unidimensional factor structure for the SDS-3, and multi-group CFA (MGCFA) suggested that this factor structure was invariant across countries, languages, gender identities, and sexual orientations. Cronbach's α for the unidimensional score was 0.83 (range between 0.76 and 0.89), and McDonald's ω was 0.84 (range between 0.76 and 0.90). Participants who did not experience sexual problems had significantly lower SDS-3 total scores (M = 2.99; SD=2.54) compared to those who reported sexual problems (M = 5.60; SD=3.00), with a large effect size (Cohen's d = 1.01 [95 % CI=-1.03, -0.98]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The SDS-3 has a unidimensional factor structure and appears to be valid and reliable for measuring sexual distress among individuals from different countries, gender identities, and sexual orientations.
Artois University Arras France
Auckland University of Technology Auckland New Zealand
Austrian Public Health Institute Vienna Austria
Center for Excessive Gambling Addiction Medicine Lausanne University Hospitals Lausanne Switzerland
Centre for Advanced Research Excellence in Public Health Savar Dhaka Bangladesh
Centre of Excellence in Responsible Gaming University of Gibraltar Gibraltar United Kingdom
Chuncheon Addiction Management Center Republic of Korea
College of Education Psychology and Social Work Flinders University Adelaide Australia
College of Healthcare Sciences James Cook University Queensland Australia
Connecticut Council on Problem Gambling Wethersfield CT USA
Decentralized Big Data Team RIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence Project Tokyo Japan
Departamento de Psicología Básica Clínica y Psicobiología University Jaume 1 Castelló Spain
Département de Psychologie Université de Montréal Montréal Canada
Département de Psychologie Université du Québec à Trois Rivières Trois Rivières Canada
Department of Addictology 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Addictology General University Hospital Prague Prague Czech Republic
Department of Neuropsychiatry Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto University Kyoto Japan
Department of Psychiatry All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi India
Department of Psychiatry College of Medicine Hallym University Chuncheon Republic of Korea
Department of Psychiatry Faculdade de Medicina Universidade de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil
Department of Psychology and Cognitive Science University of Trento Trento Italy
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience Auckland University of Technology Auckland New Zealand
Department of Psychology Faculty of Education Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Psychology Nottingham Trent University Nottingham United Kingdom
Department of Psychology Sharda University Greater Noida Uttar Pradesh India
Department of Psychology University of Nevada Las Vegas NV USA
Department of Public Health and Informatics Jahangirnagar University Savar Dhaka Bangladesh
Doctoral School of Psychology ELTE Eötvös Loránd University Budapest Hungary
Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud Universidad Privada del Norte Lima Perú
Facultad de Medicina Universidad Científica del Sur Lima Perú
Facultad de Psicología Universidad de Talca Talca Talca Region del Maule Chile
Faculty of Philosophy University of Ss Cyril and Methodius in Trnava Trnava Slovakia
Florida State University Panama Republic of Panama
Health Promotion Research Centre University of Galway Galway Ireland
HELP University Kuala Lumpur Malaysia
Institute for Behavioural Addictions Sigmund Freud University Vienna Austria
Institute for Neural Computations University of California San Diego CA USA
Institute of Allied Health Sciences College of Medicine National Cheng Kung University Tainan Taiwan
Institute of Legal Psychiatry Lausanne University Hospitals Lausanne Switzerland
Institute of Psychology Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University Warsaw Poland
Institute of Psychology ELTE Eötvös Loránd University Budapest Hungary
Institute of Psychology Polish Academy of Sciences Warsaw Poland
Institute of Psychology University of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland
Leuven School For Mass Communication KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts Skopje Republic of North Macedonia
School of Psychology University of Southampton Southampton United Kingdom
School of Social Work Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences University of Haifa Haifa Israel
Sistema Nacional de Investigación SENACYT Panama Republic of Panama
Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia Colombia
Universidad Privada de Santa Cruz de la Sierra Santa Cruz Bolivia
University of Baghdad College of Medicine Baghdad Iraq
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Alimoradi Z., Lin C.Y., Pakpour A.H. Domestic violence during COVID-19 pandemic: An issue that needs comprehensive attention and intervention. Asian Journal of Social Health and Behavior. 2022;5(1):1–2. doi: 10.4103/shb.shb_32_22. DOI
American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. American Psychiatric Association. 2013;5 doi: 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596. DOI
Atlantis E., Sullivan T. Bidirectional association between depression and sexual dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2012;9(6):1497–1507. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02709.x. PubMed DOI
Azimi Nekoo E., Burri A., Ashrafti F., Fridlund B., Koenig H.G., Derogatis L.R., et al. Psychometric properties of the Iranian version of the Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised in women. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2014;11(4):995–1004. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12449. PubMed DOI
Bae J.H., Han C.S., Kang S.H., Shim K.S., Kim J.J., Moon D.G. Development of a Korean version of the Female Sexual Distress Scale. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2006;3(6):1013–1017. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00328.x. PubMed DOI
Beaton D.E., Bombardier C., Guillemin F., Ferraz M.B. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186–3191. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014. PubMed DOI
Bőthe B., Koos M., Nagy L., Kraus S.W., Potenza M.N., Demetrovics Z. International Sex Survey: Study protocol of a large, cross-cultural collaborative study in 45 countries. Journal of Behavioral Addictions. 2021;10(3):632–645. doi: 10.1556/2006.2021.00063. PubMed DOI PMC
Bőthe B., Toth-Kiraly I., Griffiths M.D., Potenza M.N., Orosz G., Demetrovics Z. Are sexual functioning problems associated with frequent pornography use and/or problematic pornography use? Results from a large community survey including males and females. Addictive Behaviors. 2021;112 doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106603. PubMed DOI
Browne M.W., Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods and Research. 1992;21(2):230–258.
Byrne B.M., Shavelson R.J., Muthén B. Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin. 1989;105(3):456–466. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.456. DOI
Chen F.F. Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling. 2007;14(3):464–504. doi: 10.1080/10705510701301834. DOI
Cheung G.W., Rensvold R.B. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling. 2002;9(2):233–255. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5. DOI
Cohen J. Academic Press; 2013. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.
del Mar Pozo-Balado M., Matsumoto H., Vitale M.G., Praena-Fernández J.M., Farrington D.M. Reliability and validity of the adapted Spanish version of the Early-Onset Scoliosis-24 Questionnaire. Spine. 2016;41(10):E625–E631. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001322. PubMed DOI
Derogatis L., Clayton A., Lewis-D'Agostino D., Wunderlich G., Fu Y. Validation of the Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised for assessing distress in women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2008;5(2):357–364. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00672.x. PubMed DOI
Derogatis L.R., Rosen R., Leiblum S., Burnett A., Heiman J. The Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS): Initial validation of a standardized scale for assessment of sexually related personal distress in women. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy. 2002;28(4):317–330. doi: 10.1080/00926230290001448. PubMed DOI
Field A. 4th Edition. Sage; Los Angeles, London, New Delhi: 2013. Discovering statistics using ibm spss statistics: And sex and drugs and rock “N” roll.
Finney S.J., DiStefano C. In: Structural equation modeling. Hancock G.R., Mueller R.O., editors. Information Age Publishing; 2006. Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling; pp. 269–314. Vol. 10.
Gil-Monte P.R., Espejo B., Checa I., Gil-LaOrden P., Angeline J., K., Carlotto M.S., et al. Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Spanish Burnout Inventory among professionals across 17 countries and regions. Applied Research in Quality of Life. 2023;18(2):869–892. doi: 10.1007/s11482-022-10108-1. PubMed DOI PMC
Ishak W.W., Tobia G. DSM-5 changes in diagnostic criteria of sexual dysfunctions. Reproductive System & Sexual Disorders. 2013;2(2):122. doi: 10.4172/2161-038X.1000122. DOI
Klein V., Savas O., Conley T.D. How WEIRD and androcentric is sex research? Global inequities in study populations. Journal of Sex Research. 2022;59(7):810–817. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2021.1918050. PubMed DOI
Kline R.B. Guilford Publications; 2023. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling: Methodology in the social sciences.
Kroenke K., Spitzer R.L., Williams J.B. The Patient Health Questionnaire-2: Validity of a two-item depression screener. Medical Care. 2003;41(11):1284–1292. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000093487.78664.3C. PubMed DOI
Lin C.Y., Fung X.C.C., Nikoobakht M., Burri A., Pakpour A.H. Using the Theory of Planned Behavior incorporated with perceived barriers to explore sexual counseling services delivered by healthcare professionals in individuals suffering from epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior. 2017;74:124–129. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.06.011. PubMed DOI
Lin C.Y., Oveisi S., Burri A., Pakpour A.H. Theory of Planned Behavior including self-stigma and perceived barriers explain help-seeking behavior for sexual problems in Iranian women suffering from epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior. 2017;68:123–128. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.01.010. PubMed DOI
Lin C.Y., Potenza M.N., Brostrom A., Blycker G.R., Pakpour A.H. Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Sexuality (MBCT-S) improves sexual functioning and intimacy among older women with epilepsy: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. Seizure. 2019;73:64–74. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2019.10.010. PubMed DOI
Masoudi M., Maasoumi R., Bragazzi N.L. Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on sexual functioning and activity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC public health. 2022;22(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12390-4. PubMed DOI PMC
McCabe M., Althof S.E., Assalian P., Chevret-Measson M., Leiblum S.R., Simonelli C., et al. Psychological and interpersonal dimensions of sexual function and dysfunction. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2010;7(1):327–336. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01618.x. PubMed DOI
Milfont T.L., Fischer R. Testing measurement invariance across groups: Applications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of psychological research. 2010;3(1):111–130.
Mitchell K.R., Lewis R., O'Sullivan L.F., Fortenberry J.D. What is sexual wellbeing and why does it matter for public health? Lancet Public Health. 2021;6(8):e608–e613. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00099-2. PubMed DOI PMC
Muthén B., Asparouhov T. Recent methods for the study of measurement invariance with many groups: Alignment and random effects. Sociological Methods & Research. 2018;47(4):637–664. doi: 10.1177/0049124117701488. DOI
Nowosielski K., Wrobel B., Sioma-Markowska U., Poreba R. Sexual dysfunction and distress–development of a Polish version of the Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2013;10(5):1304–1312. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12112. PubMed DOI
Pâquet M., Rosen N.O., Steben M., Mayrand M.H., Santerre-Baillargeon M., Bergeron S. Daily anxiety and depressive symptoms in couples coping with vulvodynia: Associations with women's pain, women's sexual function, and both partners' sexual distress. Journal of Pain. 2018;19(5):552–561. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2017.12.264. PubMed DOI
Putnick D.L., Bornstein M.H. Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review. 2016;41:71–90. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004. PubMed DOI PMC
Rutkowski L., Svetina D. Assessing the hypothesis of measurement invariance in the context of large-scale international surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 2014;74(1):31–57. doi: 10.1177/0013164413498257. DOI
Santos-Iglesias P., Bergeron S., Brotto L.A., Rosen N.O., Walker L.M. Preliminary validation of the Sexual Distress Scale-Short Form: Applications to women, men, and prostate cancer survivors. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy. 2020;46(6):542–563. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2020.1761494. PubMed DOI
Santos-Iglesias P., Mohamed B., Danko A., Walker L.M. Psychometric validation of the Female Sexual Distress Scale in male samples. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2018;47(6):1733–1743. doi: 10.1007/s10508-018-1146-2. PubMed DOI
Santos-Iglesias P., Mohamed B., Walker L.M. A systematic review of sexual distress measures. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2018;15(5):625–644. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.02.020. PubMed DOI
Sawicki A.J., Żemojtel-Piotrowska M., Balcerowska J.M., Sawicka M.J., Piotrowski J., Sedikides C., et al. The Fear of COVID-19 scale: Its structure and measurement invariance across 48 countries. Psychological Assessment. 2022;34(3):294. doi: 10.1037/pas0001102. PubMed DOI
Tavares I.M., Santos-Iglesias P., Nobre P.J. Psychometric validation of the Sexual Distress Scale in male and female Portuguese samples. Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2022;19(5):834–845. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2022.02.026. PubMed DOI
Varghese E., Bhaskar A., Ponnuraja C. Count regression model to predict spousal harms in Tamil Nadu. Asian Journal of Social Health and Behavior. 2022;5(2):85. doi: 10.4103/shb.shb_171_21. DOI
Varney P., Guo W., Brown M., Usmani H., Marquez J., Ayasse M., et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of sexual dysfunction in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa. International Journal of Dermatology. 2023;62(6):737–746. doi: 10.1111/ijd.16328. PubMed DOI
Yepes-Nunez J.J., Morales Cardenas E., Gomez-Garcia C., Manco Sepulveda M., Martinez L.M., Valero A., et al. Classic test and generalizability theories are both useful for cross-cultural adaptation of an allergic rhinitis health-related quality of life questionnaire. World Allergy Organization Journal. 2021;14(12) doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2021.100612. PubMed DOI PMC