Follow-up of patients with chronic conditions within primary care practices during COVID-19: Results from 7 Central and Eastern-European countries from the cross-sectional PRICOV-19 study
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
39207040
PubMed Central
PMC11363735
DOI
10.1080/13814788.2024.2391468
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- COVID-19, Patient follow-up, multi-country, outreach, quality of care,
- MeSH
- Chronic Disease MeSH
- COVID-19 * epidemiology MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Primary Health Care * organization & administration statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Cross-Sectional Studies MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Geographicals
- Europe MeSH
- Europe, Eastern MeSH
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic posed severe challenges to delivery of services at Primary Care level and for achieving follow-up of patients with chronic diseases. OBJECTIVES: We analysed data from the PRICOV-19 study to explore determinants of active follow-up for chronic disease patients in seven Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries during the pandemic. METHODS: Pricov-19 was a cross-sectional study conducted within PC (Primary Care) practices in 37 European countries. We analysed data from 7 CEE countries (Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Moldova, Romania, Ukraine) collected between November 2020 and December 2021. Practices were recruited through random or convenience sampling and participation of practices was voluntary. We performed descriptive statistics to identify the level of follow-up of chronic disease and what health system and practice-specific factors were associated with better follow-up. We used logistic regression and meta-analysis techniques to explore associations and heterogeneity between countries. RESULTS: 67.8% out of 978 practices reported actively following up chronic patients. Positive associations were found between active follow-up and such as having more GPs (aOR = 1.18, p-value = 0.005), an above-average chronic patient population (aOR = 3.13, p-value = 0.006), adequate government support (aOR = 2.35, p-value = 0.001), and GPs having time for guideline reading (aOR = 0.008, p-value = 1.71). CONCLUSIONS: Patient follow-up, was influenced by different health system and practice-specific factors. The implications suggest the need for government support to enhance PC practice organisation during crises and solutions to decrease GP workload and provide tailored care for patients with chronic disease.
In 7 Central and Eastern European countries, 68% of PC practices effectively followed-up patients with chronic conditions during the pandemic.Key determinants for successful follow-up included government support, GP time availability, and staffing levels of GPs.Video consultations and payment mechanisms did not show significant associations with optimal patient follow-up.
Department of Family Medicine Jagiellonian University Medical College Krakow Poland
Department of Family Medicine Nicolae Testemitanu Chișinău Moldova
Department of Family Medicine Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary
Department of Family Medicine Shupyk National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education Kiev Ukraine
Department of General Medicine Plovdiv University Plovdiv Bulgaria
Department of Kinetic Therapy and Special Motricity Spiru Haret University Bucharest Romania
Department of Public Health and Primary Care Ghent University Ghent Belgium
Institute of General Practice 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Irish College of General Practitioners Dublin Ireland
Mother and Child Institute Chișinău Moldova
Quality and Safety Ghent University Ghent Belgium
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute Allschwil Switzerland
See more in PubMed
Lupu D, Tiganasu R.. COVID-19 and the efficiency of health systems in Europe. Health Econ Rev. 2022;12(1):14. Epub 2022/02/13. PubMed PMC
Rahim F, Allen R, Barroy H, et al. . COVID-19 funds in response to the pandemic. Washington (DC): International Monetary Fund; 2020.
Figueras J, Muscat NA.. Health systems resilience during COVID-19: lessons for building back better. Eur J Public Health. 2021;31:108. PubMed
Haldane V, De Foo C, Abdalla SM, et al. . Health systems resilience in managing the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons from 28 countries. Nat Med. 2021;27(6):964–980. doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01381-y. PubMed DOI
Dehghani Tafti A, Fatehpanah A, Salmani I, et al. . COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the continuity of care for chronic patients: evidence from a cross-sectional retrospective study in a developing country. BMC Prim Care. 2023;24(1):137. doi:10.1186/s12875-023-02086-6. PubMed DOI PMC
Fekadu G, Bekele F, Tolossa T, et al. . Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on chronic diseases care follow-up and current perspectives in low resource settings: a narrative review. Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol. 2021;13(3):86–93. Epub 2021/08/03. PubMed PMC
Kluge HHP, Wickramasinghe K, Rippin HL, et al. . Prevention and control of non-communicable diseases in the COVID-19 response. Lancet. 2020;395(10238):1678–1680. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31067-9. PubMed DOI PMC
Booth A, Reed AB, Ponzo S, et al. . Population risk factors for severe disease and mortality in COVID-19: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2021;16(3):e0247461. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0247461. PubMed DOI PMC
Deml MJ, Minnema J, Dubois J, et al. . The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the continuity of care for at-risk patients in Swiss primary care settings: a mixed-methods study. Soc Sci Med. 2022;298:114858. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114858. PubMed DOI PMC
Lopez Segui F, Hernandez Guillamet G, Pifarré Arolas H, et al. . Characterization and identification of variations in types of primary care visits before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Catalonia: big data analysis study. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(9):e29622. Epub 14.9.2021. PubMed PMC
Alexander GC, Tajanlangit M, Heyward J, et al. . Use and content of primary care office-based vs telemedicine care visits during the COVID-19 pandemic in the US. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(10):e2021476-e. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.21476. PubMed DOI PMC
Vermeulen L, Schäfer W, Pavlic DR, et al. . Community orientation of general practitioners in 34 countries. Health Policy. 2018;122(10):1070–1077. Epub 2018/07/26. PubMed
Bouchez T, Gautier S, Le Breton J, et al. . The challenge for general practitioners to keep in touch with vulnerable patients during the COVID-19 lockdown: an observational study in France. BMC Prim Care. 2022;23(1):82. doi:10.1186/s12875-022-01694-y. PubMed DOI PMC
Edelman A, Marten R, Montenegro H, et al. . Modified scoping review of the enablers and barriers to implementing primary health care in the COVID-19 context. Health Policy Plan. 2021;36(7):1163–1186. doi:10.1093/heapol/czab075. PubMed DOI PMC
Sagan A, Kowalska-Bobko I, Bryndová L, et al. . What is being done to respond to the rise of chronic diseases and multi-morbidity in Czechia, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia? Front Public Health. 2022;10:1082164. Epub 2023/02/03. PubMed PMC
Van der HI, Snoeijs S, Melchiorre MG, et al. . Innovating care for people with multiple chronic conditions in Europe. Brussels: ICARE4EU; 2015; p. 10.
Stefler D, Brett D, Sarkadi-Nagy E, et al. . Traditional Eastern European diet and mortality: prospective evidence from the HAPIEE study. Eur J Nutr. 2021;60(2):1091–1100. doi:10.1007/s00394-020-02319-9. PubMed DOI PMC
Seifert B, Svab I, Madis T, et al. . Perspectives of family medicine in Central and Eastern Europe. Fam Pract. 2008;25(2):113–118. doi:10.1093/fampra/cmn009. PubMed DOI
Oleszczyk M, Svab I, Seifert B, et al. . Family medicine in post-communist Europe needs a boost. Exploring the position of family medicine in healthcare systems of Central and Eastern Europe and Russia. BMC Fam Pract. 2012;13(1):15. doi:10.1186/1471-2296-13-15. PubMed DOI PMC
Krztoń-Królewiecka A, Švab I, Oleszczyk M, et al. . The development of academic family medicine in central and eastern Europe since 1990. BMC Fam Pract. 2013;14(1):37. doi:10.1186/1471-2296-14-37. PubMed DOI PMC
Europe WROf . Health and care workforce in Europe: time to act. Denmark: World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe Copenhagen; 2022.
Van Poel E, Vanden Bussche P, Klemenc-Ketis Z, et al. . How did general practices organize care during the COVID-19 pandemic: the protocol of the cross-sectional PRICOV-19 study in 38 countries. BMC Prim Care. 2022;23(1):11. doi:10.1186/s12875-021-01587-6. PubMed DOI PMC
Meiklejohn JA, Mimery A, Martin JH, et al. . The role of the GP in follow-up cancer care: a systematic literature review. J Cancer Surviv. 2016;10(6):990–1011. doi:10.1007/s11764-016-0545-4. PubMed DOI
Jones R, Dale J, MacArtney J.. Challenges experienced by GPs when providing palliative care in the UK: a systematic qualitative literature review. BJGP Open. 2023;7(2):BJGPO.2022.0159. BJGPO.2022.0159. doi:10.3399/bjgpo.2022.0159. PubMed DOI PMC
Ekeland AG, Bowes A, Flottorp S.. Effectiveness of telemedicine: a systematic review of reviews. Int J Med Inform. 2010;79(11):736–771. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.08.006. PubMed DOI
Kumpunen S, Webb E, Permanand G, et al. . Transformations in the landscape of primary health care during COVID-19: themes from the European region. Health Policy. 2022;126(5):391–397. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.08.002. PubMed DOI PMC
Brekke KR, Holmås TH, Monstad K, et al. . How does the type of remuneration affect physician behavior? Fixed salary versus fee-for-service. Am J Health Econ. 2020;6(1):104–138. doi:10.1086/706624. DOI
Van Poel E, Collins C, Groenewegen P, et al. . The organization of outreach work for vulnerable patients in general practice during COVID-19: results from the cross-sectional PRICOV-19 study in 38 countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(4):3165. PubMed PMID doi:10.3390/ijerph20043165. PubMed DOI PMC