Single or Double Induction With 7 + 3 Containing Standard or High-Dose Daunorubicin for Newly Diagnosed AML: The Randomized DaunoDouble Trial by the Study Alliance Leukemia
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Multicenter Study
PubMed
39284116
DOI
10.1200/jco.24.00235
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute * drug therapy mortality MeSH
- Cytarabine * administration & dosage MeSH
- Daunorubicin * administration & dosage MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Remission Induction MeSH
- Induction Chemotherapy * methods MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Antibiotics, Antineoplastic administration & dosage MeSH
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols * therapeutic use administration & dosage MeSH
- Drug Administration Schedule MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Cytarabine * MeSH
- Daunorubicin * MeSH
- Antibiotics, Antineoplastic MeSH
PURPOSE: To determine the optimal daunorubicin dose and number of 7 + 3 induction cycles in newly diagnosed AML, this randomized controlled trial compared a once daily dose of 60 mg/m2 with 90 mg/m2 daunorubicin in the first 7 + 3 induction and one versus two cycles of 7 + 3 induction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients age 18-65 years with newly diagnosed AML were randomly assigned to 60 versus 90 mg/m2 daunorubicin once daily plus cytarabine. Patients with marrow blasts below 5% on day 15 after first induction were randomly assigned to receive a second induction cycle or no second induction cycle. RESULTS: Eight hundred and sixty-four patients with a median age of 52 years were randomly assigned. After a preplanned interim analysis showing no significant difference in response between 60 and 90 mg/m2, all consecutive patients received 60 mg/m2 daunorubicin once daily. The proportion of good early responders was 44% versus 48% (P = .983) with a composite complete remission (CRc) rate of 90% versus 89% after induction (P = .691); the 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) after 60 versus 90 mg/m2 once daily was 54% versus 50% (P = .561), and the 3-year overall survival (OS) was 65% versus 58% (P = .242). Among 389 good responders, CRc rates at the end of induction were 87% after single induction and 85% after double induction. The 3-year RFS was 51% versus 60% (hazard ratio [HR], 1.3; P = .091), and the 3-year OS was 76% versus 75% after single versus double induction (HR, 1.0; P = .937). CONCLUSION: The use of 90 mg/m2 daunorubicin once daily in the context of classical 7 + 3 induction does not significantly improve early response and does not lead to higher remission rates or longer survival than 60 mg/m2 once daily. In patients with a good early response after first induction, a second induction has only a limited impact on RFS and does not result in an OS benefit.
2 Medizinische Klinik Universitätsklinikum Augsburg Augsburg Germany
Department of Hemato Oncology Palacký University Olomouc Czech Republic
Department of Hematology Oncology and Palliative Care Rems Murr Kliniken Winnenden Germany
Department of Hematology Robert Bosch Krankenhaus Stuttgart Germany
Department of Hematology University Hospital Essen University of Duisburg Essen Essen Germany
Department of Internal Medicine 1 University Hospital TU Dresden Dresden Germany
Department of Internal Medicine 2 University Hospital Frankfurt Frankfurt Germany
Department of Internal Medicine 3 Chemnitz Hospital Chemnitz Germany
Department of Internal Medicine 5 Universitätsklinikum Erlangen Erlangen Germany
Department of Internal Medicine 5 University of Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany
Department of Internal Medicine Hematology and Oncology University Hospital Brno Brno Czech Republic
Department of Medicine A University Hospital Münster Münster Germany
Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion Prague Czech Republic
Klinik für Innere Medizin 1 Westpfalzklinikum Kaiserslautern Germany
Klinik für Innere Medizin Universitätsklinikum Jena Jena Germany
NCT Trial Center National Center of Tumor Diseases German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg Germany
References provided by Crossref.org