Ultrasound assessment of the pelvic sidewall: methodological consensus opinion
Language English Country England, Great Britain Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
Grant support
UNCE/24/MED/018
lékařská fakulta Univerzity Karlovy
CZ-DRO-VFN64165
Všeobecná Fakultní Nemocnice v Praze
NV19-03-00552
Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
NU21-03-00461
Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
PubMed
39499650
PubMed Central
PMC11693842
DOI
10.1002/uog.29122
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- anatomy, clinical cases, endometriosis, gynecological tumor, pelvic sidewall, transvaginal ultrasound,
- MeSH
- Consensus * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Lymph Nodes diagnostic imaging MeSH
- Pelvis * diagnostic imaging MeSH
- Ultrasonography * methods MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
A standardized methodology for the ultrasound evaluation of the pelvic sidewall has not been proposed to date. Herein, a collaborative group of gynecologists and gynecological oncologists with extensive ultrasound experience presents a systematic methodology for the ultrasonographic evaluation of structures within the pelvic sidewall. Five categories of anatomical structures are described (muscles, vessels, lymph nodes, nerves and ureters). A step-by-step transvaginal ultrasound (or, when this is not feasible, transrectal ultrasound) approach is outlined for the evaluation of each anatomical landmark within these categories. Accurate assessment of the pelvic sidewall using a standardized approach improves the detection and diagnosis of non-gynecological pathologies that may mimic gynecological tumors, reducing the risk of unnecessary and even harmful intervention. Furthermore, it plays an important role in completing the staging of malignant gynecological conditions. Transvaginal or transrectal ultrasound therefore represents a viable alternative to magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of lesions affecting the pelvic sidewall, if performed by an expert sonographer. A series of videoclips showing normal and abnormal findings within each respective category illustrates how establishing a universally applicable approach for evaluating this crucial region will be helpful for assessing both benign and malignant conditions affecting the pelvic sidewall. © 2024 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Department of Biomedical Science for Health University of Milan Milan Italy
Department of Gynaecological Oncology KK Women's and Children's Hospital Singapore
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Faculty of Medicine Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary
Dipartimento Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Rome Italy
See more in PubMed
Szabo G, Bokor A, Fancsovits V, et al. Clinical and ultrasound characteristics of deep endometriosis affecting sacral plexus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024;64:104‐111. PubMed
Guerriero S, Condous G, Rolla M, et al. Addendum to the consensus opinion from the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group: sonographic evaluation of the parametrium. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023;64:275‐280. PubMed
Timor‐Tritsch IE. Sliding organs sign in gynecological ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46:125‐126. PubMed
Fischerova D, Santos G, Wong L, et al. Imaging in gynecological disease (26): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of benign retroperitoneal pelvic peripheral‐nerve‐sheath tumors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023;62:727‐738. PubMed
Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Abu‐Rustum NR. Abdominal and pelvic anatomy. Principles of Gynecologic Oncology Surgery. Elsevier; 2021:3‐49.
Moore L. The pelvis and perineum. In: Wilkins W, ed. Clinically Oriented Anatomy. 3rd ed. University of Michigan; 2015:255.
Moro F, Zermano S, Ianieri MM, et al. Dynamic transvaginal ultrasound examination for assessing anatomy of parametrium. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023;62:904‐906. PubMed
Bizzarri N, Ianieri MM, Rosati A, et al. Consensus on the Gemelli terminology of surgical anatomy for radical hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2023;33:876‐881. PubMed
Susan S. Gray's Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. 41st ed. Elsevier Ltd.; 2016.
Federative Committee on Anatomical Terminology (FCAT) . Terminologia Anatomica: International Anatomical Terminology. Georg Thieme Verlag; 1998:300.
Fischerova D. Ultrasound scanning of the pelvis and abdomen for staging of gynecological tumors: a review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38:246‐266. PubMed
Fischerova D, Garganese G, Reina H, et al. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of lymph nodes: consensus opinion from the Vulvar International Tumor Analysis (VITA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021;57:861‐879. PubMed
Dalley AFAA. Neurovascular structures of gluteal and posterior thigh regions. In: Wilkins LW, ed. Moore's Clinically Oriented Anatomy. Vol 9. 9th ed. Wolters Kluwer; 2022:741‐746.
Szabo G, Madar I, Hudelist G, et al. Visualization of sacral nerve roots and sacral plexus on gynecological transvaginal ultrasound: feasibility study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023;62:290‐299. PubMed
Hurd WW, Chee SS, Gallagher KL, Ohl DA, Hurteau JA. Location of the ureters in relation to the uterine cervix by computed tomography. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184:336‐339. PubMed
Querleu D, Cibula D, Abu‐Rustum NR. 2017 Update on the Querleu‐Morrow classification of radical hysterectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:3406‐3412. PubMed PMC
Jackson LA, Ramirez DMO, Carrick KS, Pedersen R, Spirtos A, Corton MM. Gross and histologic anatomy of the pelvic ureter: clinical applications to pelvic surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133:896‐904. PubMed
Bean E, Naftalin J, Jurkovic D. How to assess the ureters during pelvic ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53:729‐733. PubMed
Micco M, Lupinelli M, Mangialardi M, Gui B, Manfredi R. Patterns of recurrent disease in cervical cancer. J Pers Med. 2022;12:755. PubMed PMC
Bhatla N, Aoki D, Sharma DN, Sankaranarayanan R. Cancer of the cervix uteri: 2021 update. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021;155(Suppl 1):28‐44. PubMed PMC
Guerriero S, Condous G, van den Bosch T, et al. Systematic approach to sonographic evaluation of the pelvis in women with suspected endometriosis, including terms, definitions and measurements: a consensus opinion from the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48:318‐332. PubMed
Barra F, Scala C, Biscaldi E, et al. Ureteral endometriosis: a systematic review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, risk of malignant transformation and fertility. Hum Reprod Update. 2018;24:710‐730. PubMed
Siquara De Sousa AC, Capek S, Amrami KK, Spinner RJ. Neural involvement in endometriosis: review of anatomic distribution and mechanisms. Clin Anat. 2015;28:1029‐1038. PubMed