• This record comes from PubMed

Diagnosis and treatment of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease - a systematic review of cost-effectiveness and economic burden

. 2024 Nov 06 ; 24 (1) : 1351. [epub] 20241106

Language English Country England, Great Britain Media electronic

Document type Journal Article, Systematic Review

Grant support
grant agreement no. 101057525, project eCAP European Union's Horizon Europe Research and Innovation
grant agreement no. 101057525, project eCAP European Union's Horizon Europe Research and Innovation
grant agreement no. 101057525, project eCAP European Union's Horizon Europe Research and Innovation
grant agreement no. 101057525, project eCAP European Union's Horizon Europe Research and Innovation
grant agreement no. 101057525, project eCAP European Union's Horizon Europe Research and Innovation

Links

PubMed 39501242
PubMed Central PMC11539747
DOI 10.1186/s12913-024-11781-8
PII: 10.1186/s12913-024-11781-8
Knihovny.cz E-resources

BACKGROUND: This study aims to review the existing knowledge on the cost-effectiveness and item costs related to the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients at different stages. METHODS: The study adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. The systematic search involved several steps: finding and identifying relevant articles, filtering them according to the set criteria, and examining the final number of selected articles to obtain the primary information. The number of articles published between 2013 and September 2024 in the Web of Science and PubMed databases was considered. The CHEERS checklist was used for the risk of bias assessment. Ultimately, 36 studies were included. RESULTS: Regarding the cost-effectiveness of GERD treatment, Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) appeared to be the dominant solution for non-refractory patients. However, this might change with the adoption of the novel drug vonoprazan, which is more effective and cheaper. With advancements in emerging technologies, new diagnostic and screening approaches such as Endosheath, Cytosponge, and combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring catheters should be considered, with potential implications for optimal GERD management strategies. DISCUSSION: The new diagnostic methods are reliable, safe, and more comfortable than standard procedures. PPIs are commonly used as the first line of treatment for GERD. Surgery, such as magnetic sphincter augmentation or laparoscopic fundoplication, is only recommended for patients with treatment-resistant GERD or severe symptoms. OTHER: Advances in emerging technologies for diagnostics and screening may lead to a shift in the entire GERD treatment model, offering less invasive options and potentially improving patients' quality of life.

See more in PubMed

Arnold M, Abnet CC, Neale RE, et al. Global burden of 5 major types of gastrointestinal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2020;159(1):335–e34915. 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.02.068. PubMed PMC

United European Gastroenterology. Burden, economic impact and research gaps: Key findings from the Pan-European study on digestive diseases and cancers. 2024. https://www.nxtbook.com/ueg/UEG/burden-economic-impact-and-research-gaps/index.php#/p/1. Accessed 8 Oct 2024.

Wang R, Li Z, Liu S, Zhang D. Global, regional, and national burden of 10 digestive diseases in 204 countries and territories from 1990 to 2019. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1061453. 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1061453. PubMed PMC

Nirwan JS, Hasan SS, Babar ZUD, Conway BR, Ghori MU. Global prevalence and risk factors of Gastro-oesophageal reflux Disease (GORD): systematic review with Meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):5814. 10.1038/s41598-020-62795-1. PubMed PMC

Gawron AJ, French DD, Pandolfino JE, Howden CW. Economic evaluations of gastroesophageal reflux Disease Medical Management. PharmacoEconomics. 2014;32(8):745–58. 10.1007/s40273-014-0164-8. PubMed PMC

Zhang D, Liu S, Li Z, Wang R. Global, regional and national burden of gastroesophageal reflux disease, 1990–2019: update from the GBD 2019 study. Ann Med. 2022;54(1):1372–84. 10.1080/07853890.2022.2074535. PubMed PMC

El-Serag HB, Sweet S, Winchester CC, Dent J. Update on the epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut. 2014;63(6):871–80. 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-304269. PubMed PMC

Schwenkglenks M, Marbet UA, Szucs TD. Epidemiology and costs of gastroesophageal reflux disease in Switzerland: a population-based study. Sozial- und Praventivmedizin/Social Prev Medicine. 2004;49(1):51–61. 10.1007/s00038-003-2090-y. PubMed

Willich SN, Nocon M, Kulig M, et al. Cost-of-disease analysis in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and Barrett’s mucosa. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;23(3):371–6. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02763.x. PubMed

Kamangar F, Nasrollahzadeh D, Safiri S, et al. The global, regional, and national burden of oesophageal cancer and its attributable risk factors in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet Gastroenterology Hepatology. 2020;5(6):582–97. 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30007-8. PubMed PMC

Foroutan M, Zojaji H, Ehsani MJ, Darvishi M. Advances in the diagnosis of GERD using the esophageal pH monitoring, gastro-esophageal Impedance-pH monitoring, and Pitfalls. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018;6(10):1934–40. 10.3889/oamjms.2018.410. PubMed PMC

Kuipers EJ. Barrett esophagus and life expectancy: implications for screening? Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2011;7(10):689–91. PubMed PMC

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and Meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. PubMed PMC

Leung XY, Sun J, Bai B. Bibliometrics of social media research: a co-citation and co-word analysis. Int J Hospitality Manage. 2017;66:35–45. 10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.06.012.

Bank of England. Inflation calculator. 2024. https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/monetary-policy/inflation/inflation-calculator. Accessed 8 Oct 2024.

Inflation calculator. 2024.  https://tools.csb.gov.lv/cpi_calculator/en/. Accessed 8 Oct 2024.

OECD Data Explorer • OECD Data Archive. OECD. 2024. https://data-explorer.oecd.org/vis?lc=en&df[ds]=DisseminateArchiveDMZ&df[id]=DF_DP_LIVE&df[ag]=OECD&av=true&pd=2022%2C2022&dq=EU27_2020%2BITA%2BAUS%2BAUT%2BBEL%2BCAN%2BCHL%2BCOL%2BCRI%2BCZE%2BDNK%2BEST%2BFIN%2BFRA%2BDEU%2BGRC%2BHUN%2BISL%2BIRL%2BISR%2BJPN%2BKOR%2BLVA%2BLTU%2BLUX%2BMEX%2BNLD%2BNZL%2BNOR%2BPOL%2BPRT%2BSVK%2BSVN%2BESP%2BSWE%2BCHE%2BTUR%2BGBR%2BUSA%2BOAVG%2BOECD.PPP...A&to[TIME_PERIOD]=false&vw=tb&lb=bt. Accessed 8 Oct 2024.

Lata T, Trautman J, Townend P, Wilson RB. Current management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease—treatment costs, safety profile, and effectiveness: a narrative review. Gastroenterol Rep. 2022;11:goad008. 10.1093/gastro/goad008. PubMed PMC

Mathews SC, Izmailyan S, Brito FA, Yamal JM, Mikhail O, Revere FL. Prevalence and Financial Burden of Digestive Diseases in a commercially insured Population. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;20(7):1480–e14877. 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.06.047. PubMed

Katz PO, Dunbar KB, Schnoll-Sussman FH, Greer KB, Yadlapati R, Spechler SJ. ACG Clinical Guideline for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2022;117(1):27–56. 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001538. PubMed PMC

Miwa H, Takeshima T, Iwasaki K, Hiroi S. Medical cost, incidence rate, and treatment status of gastroesophageal reflux disease in Japan: analysis of claims data. J Med Econ. 2016;19(11):1049–55. 10.1080/13696998.2016.1192551. PubMed

Howden CW, Manuel M, Taylor D, Jariwala-Parikh K, Tkacz J. Estimate of Refractory Reflux Disease in the United States: Economic Burden and Associated Clinical characteristics. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2021;55(10):842–50. 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001518. PubMed

Bruley des Varannes S, Ducrotté P, Vallot T, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease: impact on work productivity and daily-life activities of daytime workers. A French cross-sectional study. Dig Liver Disease. 2013;45(3):200–6. 10.1016/j.dld.2012.11.005. PubMed

McCarty TR, Jirapinyo P, James LP, Gupta S, Chan WW, Thompson CC. Transoral incisionless fundoplication is cost-effective for treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Endosc Int Open. 2022;10(07):E923–32. 10.1055/a-1783-9378. PubMed PMC

Lai L, Alvarez G, Aleu A, Apping C. Cost Avoidance Analysis of Medication Conversions on the Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in a medication Therapy Management Call Center: a budgetary perspective. J Pharm Pract. 2022;35(3):377–82. 10.1177/0897190020977764. PubMed

Park S, Park S, Park JM, et al. Anti-reflux surgery Versus Proton Pump inhibitors for severe gastroesophageal reflux disease: a cost-effectiveness study in Korea. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020;26(2):215–23. 10.5056/jnm19188. PubMed PMC

Sharaiha RZ, Freedberg DE, Abrams JA, Wang YC. Cost-effectiveness of Chemoprevention with Proton Pump inhibitors in Barrett’s Esophagus. Dig Dis Sci. 2014;59(6):1222–30. 10.1007/s10620-014-3186-3. PubMed PMC

Habu Y. Vonoprazan versus Lansoprazole for the Initial Treatment of Reflux Esophagitis: a cost-effectiveness analysis in Japan. Intern Med. 2019;58(17):2427–33. 10.2169/internalmedicine.2535-18. PubMed PMC

Yokoya Y, Igarashi A, Uda A, Deguchi H, Takeuchi T, Higuchi K. Cost-utility analysis of a ‘vonoprazan-first’ strategy versus ‘esomeprazole- or rabeprazole-first’ strategy in GERD. J Gastroenterol. 2019;54(12):1083–95. 10.1007/s00535-019-01609-2. PubMed

Gronnier C, Desbeaux A, Piessen G, et al. Day-case versus inpatient laparoscopic fundoplication: outcomes, quality of life and cost-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(7):2159–66. 10.1007/s00464-014-3448-3. PubMed

Kleppe KL, Xu Y, Funk LM, et al. Healthcare spending and utilization following antireflux surgery: examining costs and reasons for readmission. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(1):240–8. 10.1007/s00464-019-06758-2. PubMed

Schlottmann F, Strassle PD, Patti MG. Comparative Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes and costs between laparoscopic and open antireflux surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;224(3):327–33. 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.010. PubMed

Owen B, Simorov A, Siref A, Shostrom V, Oleynikov D. How does robotic anti-reflux surgery compare with traditional open and laparoscopic techniques: a cost and outcomes analysis. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(5):1686–90. 10.1007/s00464-013-3372-y. PubMed

Harper S, Grodzicki L, Mealing S, Gemmill L, Goldsmith PJ, Ahmed AR. Cost-effectiveness of a novel, non-active implantable device as a treatment for refractory gastro-esophageal reflux disease. J Med Econ. 2023;26(1):603–13. 10.1080/13696998.2023.2201063. PubMed

Harper S, Kartha M, Mealing S, Borbély YM, Zehetner J. Cost-effectiveness of the RefluxStop device for management of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease in Switzerland. J Med Econ. 2024;27(1):805–15. 10.1080/13696998.2024.2362564. PubMed

Harper S, Grodzicki L, Mealing S, Gemmill E, Goldsmith P, Ahmed A. Budget Impact of RefluxStop™ as a treatment for patients with refractory gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease in the United Kingdom. J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2024;11(1). 10.36469/001c.90924. PubMed PMC

Ayazi S, Zaidi AH, Zheng P, et al. Comparison of surgical payer costs and implication on the healthcare expenses between laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) and laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) in a large healthcare system. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(5):2279–86. 10.1007/s00464-019-07021-4. PubMed PMC

Pandolfino J, Lipham J, Chawla A, Ferko N, Hogan A, Qadeer RA. A budget impact analysis of a magnetic sphincter augmentation device for the treatment of medication-refractory mechanical gastroesophageal reflux disease: a United States payer perspective. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(4):1561–72. 10.1007/s00464-019-06916-6. PubMed

Park S, Kwon JW, Park JM, Park S, Hwang J, Seo KW. The characteristics of antireflux surgery compared to Proton pump inhibitor treatment in Korea: a nationwide study using claim data from 2007 to 2016. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2020;98(5):254. 10.4174/astr.2020.98.5.254. PubMed PMC

Funk LM, Zhang JY, Drosdeck JM, Melvin WS, Walker JP, Perry KA. Long-term cost-effectiveness of medical, endoscopic and surgical management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surgery. 2015;157(1):126–36. 10.1016/j.surg.2014.05.027. PubMed

Kleiman DA, Beninato T, Bosworth BP, et al. Early Referral for esophageal pH monitoring is more cost-effective than prolonged empiric trials of Proton-Pump inhibitors for suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(1):26–34. 10.1007/s11605-013-2327-x. PubMed

Azzam RS, Azzam GB, Nasi A, WIRELESS PH MONITORING AND CONVENTIONAL ESOPHAGEAL PH, MONITORING: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DISCOMFORT, LIMITATIONS IN DAILY ACTIVITIES AND COMPLICATIONS. ABCD arq bras cir dig. 2021;34(1):e1566. 10.1590/0102-672020210001e1566. PubMed PMC

Afaneh C, Zoghbi V, Finnerty BM, et al. BRAVO esophageal pH monitoring: more cost-effective than empiric medical therapy for suspected gastroesophageal reflux. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(8):3454–60. 10.1007/s00464-015-4629-4. PubMed

Lawenko RMA, Lee YY. Evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux Disease using the Bravo Capsule pH system. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;22(1):25–30. 10.5056/jnm15151. PubMed PMC

Törer N, Aytaç Ö. Is the routine use of Impedance Analysis for the diagnosis of Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease more expensive than conventional pH monitoring? Cost analysis of two procedures. Indian J Surg. 2017;79(3):192–5. 10.1007/s12262-016-1444-7. PubMed PMC

Moriarty JP, Shah ND, Rubenstein JH, et al. Costs associated with Barrett’s esophagus screening in the community: an economic analysis of a prospective randomized controlled trial of sedated versus hospital unsedated versus mobile community unsedated endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87(1):88–e942. 10.1016/j.gie.2017.04.019. PubMed PMC

Honing J, Kievit W, Bookelaar J, Peters Y, Iyer PG, Siersema PD. Endosheath ultrathin transnasal endoscopy is a cost-effective method for screening for Barrett’s esophagus in patients with GERD symptoms. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;89(4):712–e7223. 10.1016/j.gie.2018.10.024. PubMed

Furneri G, Klausnitzer R, Haycock L, Ihara Z. Economic value of narrow-band imaging versus white light endoscopy for the diagnosis and surveillance of Barrett’s esophagus: Cost-consequence model. Geisler BP, ed. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(3):e0212916. 10.1371/journal.pone.0212916. PubMed PMC

Singer ME, Smith MS. Wide area transepithelial sampling with computer-assisted analysis (WATS3D) is cost-effective in Barrett’s Esophagus Screening. Dig Dis Sci. 2021;66(5):1572–9. 10.1007/s10620-020-06412-1. PubMed PMC

Benaglia T, Sharples LD, Fitzgerald RC, Lyratzopoulos G. Health benefits and cost effectiveness of endoscopic and nonendoscopic cytosponge screening for Barrett’s Esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2013;144(1):62–e736. 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.09.060. PubMed

Sami SS, Moriarty JP, Rosedahl JK, et al. Comparative cost effectiveness of reflux-based and reflux-independent strategies for Barrett’s Esophagus Screening. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021;116(8):1620–31. 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001336. PubMed PMC

Swart N, Maroni R, Muldrew B, Sasieni P, Fitzgerald RC, Morris S. Economic evaluation of Cytosponge®-trefoil factor 3 for Barrett esophagus: a cost-utility analysis of randomised controlled trial data. eClinicalMedicine. 2021;37:100969. 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100969. PubMed PMC

Habu Y, Hamasaki R, Maruo M, Nakagawa T, Aono Y, Hachimine D. Treatment strategies for reflux esophagitis including a potassium-competitive acid blocker: a cost‐effectiveness analysis in Japan. J Gen Fam Med. 2021;22(5):237–45. 10.1002/jgf2.429. PubMed PMC

Park S, Kwon JW, Park JM, Park S, Seo KW. Treatment pattern and economic Burden of Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease patients in Korea. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020;26(2):281–8. 10.5056/jnm19050. PubMed PMC

Jamshed S, Bhagavathula AS, Zeeshan Qadar SM, Alauddin U, Shamim S, Hasan S. Cost-effective analysis of Proton Pump inhibitors in long-term management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a narrative review. Hosp Pharm. 2020;55(5):292–305. 10.1177/0018578719893378. PubMed PMC

Gockel I, Lange UG, Schürmann O, et al. Kosten-Effektivitäts- Und Kosten-Nutzwert-Analysen Der Antirefluxmedizin. Gesundheitswesen. 2019;81(12):1048–56. 10.1055/a-0586-3630. PubMed

Yang L, Chaudhary N, Baghdadi J, Pei Z. Microbiome in Reflux Disorders and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Cancer J. 2014;20(3):207–10. 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000044. PubMed PMC

Karjoo M, Beg M, Kesselring S, Reliability. Safety and Effectiveness of the Bravo(TM) Capsule: a catheter-free pH monitoring system for evaluation of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in children. Middle East J Dig Dis. 2012;4(1):34–9. PubMed PMC

Rubenstein JH, Inadomi JM, Brill JV, Eisen GM. Cost utility of screening for Barrett’s Esophagus with Esophageal Capsule Endoscopy Versus Conventional Upper Endoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5(3):312–8. 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.12.008. PubMed

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...