Is the Finnish grip tight enough? A manometric study of two manual perineal protection techniques
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu dopisy
Grantová podpora
BYCZ01-014
Interreg
PubMed
39648889
PubMed Central
PMC11782063
DOI
10.1111/aogs.15033
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- perineum * zranění fyziologie MeSH
- prsty ruky MeSH
- síla ruky * MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- dopisy MeSH
The use of middle finger in Finnish maneuver does not compromise the capacity of the dominant hand to disperse tension from the midline of the perineum.
Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen Charles University Plzen Czech Republic
New Technologies Research Centre UWB in Pilsen Pilsen Czech Republic
Regensburg Center of Biomedical Engineering OTH and University Regensburg Regensburg Germany
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Califano G, Saccone G, Diana B, et al. Hands‐on vs hands‐off for prevention of perineal injury: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022;4:100675. PubMed
Gurol‐Urganci I, Bidwell P, Sevdalis N, et al. Impact of a quality improvement project to reduce the rate of obstetric anal sphincter injury: a multicentre study with a stepped‐wedge design. BJOG. 2021;128:584‐592. PubMed PMC
Pirhonen JP, Grenman SE, Haadem K, et al. Frequency of anal sphincter rupture at delivery in Sweden and Finland‐‐result of difference in manual help to the baby's head. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998;77:974‐977. PubMed
Kleprlikova H, Kalis V, Lucovnik M, et al. Manual perineal protection: the know‐how and the know‐why. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99:445‐450. PubMed
Kalis V, Rusavy Z, Havelkova L, Zitka T, Tolar D, Ismail KM. Metrics of perineal support (MOPS) study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20:361. PubMed PMC
