IMPORTANCE: Aflibercept biosimilars can expand available treatment options in retinal diseases and have the potential to improve patient access to safe and effective therapy. OBJECTIVE: To establish equivalence in efficacy and similarity in safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity of SB15 and reference aflibercept (AFL) in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a randomized double-masked parallel group phase 3 trial conducted at 56 centers in 10 countries from June 2020 to March 2022, including follow-up through 56 weeks. Of 549 screened participants, 449 participants 50 years and older with treatment-naive nAMD were included and randomly assigned to SB15 (n = 224) or AFL (n = 225). Key exclusion criteria included considerable scarring, fibrosis, atrophy, and hemorrhage. This report includes results up to the end of the parallel group period at week 32. Of the 449 randomized participants, 438 (97.6%) completed week 32 follow-up. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive 2 mg of SB15 or AFL every 4 weeks for the first 12 weeks (3 injections), followed by dosing every 8 weeks up to week 48, with final assessments at week 56. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was the change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to week 8 with predefined equivalence margins of -3 letters to 3 letters. Other key end points were changes in BCVA and central subfield thickness up to week 32, safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity. RESULTS: The mean (SD) age among the 449 included participants was 74.0 (8.1) years, and 250 participants (55.7%) were female. Baseline demographic characteristics and most disease characteristics were comparable between treatment groups. The least squares mean change in BCVA from baseline to week 8 in the SB15 group was equivalent to that in the AFL group (6.7 letters vs 6.6 letters, respectively; difference, 0.1 letters; 95% CI, -1.3 to 1.4). Comparable efficacy between treatment groups was maintained up to week 32 (least squares mean change from baseline in BCVA: SB15, 7.6 letters vs AFL, 6.5 letters; least squares mean change from baseline in central subfield thickness: SB15, -110.4 μm vs AFL, -115.7 μm). No clinically relevant differences were observed in the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (SB15, 107/224 [47.8%] vs AFL, 98/224 [43.8%]) and ocular TEAEs in the study eye (SB15, 41/224 [18.3%] vs AFL, 28/224 [12.5%]). The serum concentration profiles and cumulative incidences of overall antidrug antibody positive participants were comparable. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this phase 3 randomized clinical trial, SB15 and AFL showed equivalent efficacy and comparable safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity in participants with nAMD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04450329.

• MeSH
• biosimilární léčivé přípravky * škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• inhibitory angiogeneze škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• injekce intravitreální MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• makulární degenerace * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• ranibizumab terapeutické užití   MeSH
• receptory vaskulárního endoteliálního růstového faktoru terapeutické užití   MeSH
• rekombinantní fúzní proteiny škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• vlhká makulární degenerace * diagnóza   farmakoterapie   chemicky indukované   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• zraková ostrost MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH

• MeSH
• antirevmatika ekonomika   klasifikace   škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• artritida farmakoterapie   MeSH
• biosimilární léčivé přípravky * ekonomika   klasifikace   škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• nežádoucí účinky léčiv epidemiologie   MeSH
• rutinně sbírané zdravotní údaje MeSH
• statistika jako téma MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH

OBJECTIVE: The adalimumab biosimilars FKB327 and GP2017 were approved for the therapy of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Relatively few prospective studies with biosimilar adalimumab in patients with IBD have been published. The aim of this prospective observational study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the biosimilar adalimumab. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Adalimumab biosimilars FKB327 (Hulio®) and GP2017 (Hyrimoz®) were indicated to 50 naive patients in terms of biological therapy with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC). Effectiveness of therapy was evaluated via the Crohn's Disease Activity Index [CDAI] or the Mayo Scoring System [MSS] in patients with CD or UC, respectively, before and after 12 weeks. Additional goals were to evaluate weight changes, laboratory tests and complications or adverse events of this therapy. RESULTS: In CD patients, remission (CDAI <150) was achieved in 73.5% of cases, partial response (≥70-point decrease in CDAI score from baseline) in 11.8%, no response in 11.8% and 2.9% patients discontinued therapy. In UC patients, remission (total score on partial Mayo index ≤2 points) was achieved only in 18.8% of cases, partial response (≥2-point decrease in partial Mayo score from baseline) in 43.8%, no response in 25.0% and 12.5% patients discontinued therapy. There were statistically significant improvements in CDAI, MSS, haemoglobin, fecal calprotectin, albumin and CRP serum levels after 12 weeks of therapy. Seven adverse events were identified, three of which resulted in therapy being discontinued. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective observational study proved the effectiveness of the adalimumab biosimilars FKB327 and GP2017 in IBD.

• MeSH
• adalimumab škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• biosimilární léčivé přípravky * škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• Crohnova nemoc * MeSH
• idiopatické střevní záněty * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• indukce remise MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• prospektivní studie MeSH
• ulcerózní kolitida * MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• pozorovací studie MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH

• MeSH
• adalimumab * farmakologie   klasifikace   škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• biosimilární léčivé přípravky farmakologie   klasifikace   škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• inhibitory TNF farmakologie   klasifikace   škodlivé účinky   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• klinická studie jako téma MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• revmatoidní artritida * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Originator-adalimumab, an established treatment for patients with Crohn's disease (CD), showed no difference in efficacy or adverse events versus adalimumab biosimilar SB5 (SB5-adalimumab) over 10 weeks (W) of treatment. To understand the long-term effectiveness of SB5-adalimumab in CD, patients switched from originator-adalimumab to SB5-adalimumab were compared with patients remaining on originator-adalimumab over 104 W. METHODS: Data on patients aged ≥18 years, diagnosed with CD and treated at ISCARE, were collected prospectively from July 2018 to January 2021. Primary outcome: clinical disease activity at W52, measured by Harvey-Bradshaw index (HBI). Secondary outcomes: C-reactive protein (CRP), faecal calprotectin (FC) and adalimumab concentrations at W10, 26, 52 and 104, and treatment persistence. To ensure comparable cohorts, patients were propensity score (PS)-matched for age, gender and disease activity. RESULTS: After matching, 54 patients remained per cohort. At W52, mean (SD) HBI score was 3.2 (2.5) for originator-adalimumab and 4.0 [3.6] for SB5-adalimumab (difference [95% CI] -0.78 [-2.8, 1.3]; n = 18/cohort); no clinically meaningful differences in CRP, FC or drug concentrations were noted. Kaplan-Meier's estimates (95% CI) of remaining on treatment were originator-adalimumab: 0.870 (0.785-0.965) versus SB5-adalimumab: 0.648 (0.533-0.789) at W52 and significantly lower for SB5-adalimumab versus originator-adalimumab (p < .001) over 104 W. Local skin reaction events/pain was the main reason for treatment discontinuation in the SB5-adalimumab cohort (n = 20/54 [37%]). CONCLUSIONS: These long-term results of CD patients receiving originator-adalimumab or following nonmedical switch to SB5-adalimumab show similar therapeutic effects on clinical disease activity, biological parameters and pharmacokinetic profile in both cohorts from 52 to 104 W. A separation in persistence was observed beyond W26, mainly due to differences in local reactions at the injection site.

• MeSH
• adalimumab škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• biosimilární léčivé přípravky * škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• Crohnova nemoc * chemicky indukované   farmakoterapie   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• kohortové studie MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• tendenční skóre MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mladiství MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH

Background: BI 695501 is an approved biosimilar to Humira® reference product (RP). Research design and methods: In this randomized Phase III trial (VOLTAIRE-PSO), patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis received BI 695501 or adalimumab RP (24-week treatment). Primary efficacy endpoint: the proportion of patients with ≥75% reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) response at week 16 (±18% equivalence limits for two-sided 95% confidence interval between treatment groups). Safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity were also assessed. Results: Baseline characteristics were balanced between treated groups (BI 695501, n = 159; adalimumab RP, n = 158). PASI 75 response rates (full analysis set, n = 158; n = 157) were 68.2% (BI 695501) and 70.4% (adalimumab RP) at week 16 (95% CI: -14.4%, 8.7%), and 75.3% and 72.4%, at week 24, respectively. At week 24, 41.5% (BI 695501) and 44.9% (adalimumab RP) of treated patients had treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), 3.1% and 4.4% had serious AEs, and 0.0% and 1.9% had AEs of special interest. Of treated patients, 75.3% (BI 695501) and 77.9% (adalimumab RP) were anti-drug antibody-positive. Conclusion: These data demonstrate equivalent efficacy and highly similar safety and immunogenicity between BI 695501 and adalimumab RP in patients with chronic plaque psoriasis. Study identifier: NCT02850965.

• MeSH
• adalimumab škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• biosimilární léčivé přípravky * škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• psoriáza * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• stupeň závažnosti nemoci MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH

Importance: Neovascular age-related macular degeneration is the leading cause of blindness in individuals 50 years or older. The availability of a ranibizumab biosimilar product (SB11) may facilitate access to an effective alternative to this treatment. Objective: To demonstrate equivalence of efficacy, similar safety, and similar immunogenicity of SB11 compared with the reference ranibizumab. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized, double-masked, parallel-group phase 3 equivalence study was conducted in 75 centers in 9 countries from March 14, 2018, to December 9, 2019, among 705 participants 50 years or older with neovascular age-related macular degeneration with active subfoveal choroidal neovascularization lesions. Analysis was performed on an intent-to-treat basis. Interventions: Intravitreous injection of SB11 or ranibizumab, 0.5 mg, every 4 weeks through week 48. Main Outcomes and Measures: Preplanned interim analysis after all participants completed the week 24 assessment of primary efficacy end points at week 8 for change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and week 4 for central subfield thickness (CST), with predefined equivalence margins for adjusted treatment differences of -3 letters to 3 letters for BCVA and -36 μm to 36 μm for CST. Results: Baseline and disease characteristics among 705 randomized participants (403 women [57.2%]; mean [SD] age, 74.1 [8.5] years) were comparable between treatment groups (SB11, 351; ranibizumab, 354). Least-squares mean (SE) changes in BCVA from baseline at week 8 were 6.2 (0.5) letters in the SB11 group vs 7.0 (0.5) letters in the ranibizumab group, with an adjusted treatment difference of -0.8 letter (90% CI, -1.8 to 0.2 letters). Least-squares mean (SE) changes in CST from baseline at week 4 were -108 (5) μm in the SB11 group vs -100 (5) μm in the ranibizumab group, with an adjusted treatment difference of -8 μm (95% CI, -19 to 3 μm). Incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (231 of 350 [66.0%] vs 237 of 354 [66.9%]), including serious treatment-emergent adverse events (44 of 350 [12.6%] vs 44 of 354 [12.4%]) and treatment-emergent adverse events leading to study drug discontinuation (8 of 350 [2.3%] vs 5 of 354 [1.4%]), were similar in the SB11 and ranibizumab groups. Immunogenicity was low, with a cumulative incidence of antidrug antibodies up to week 24 of 3.0% (10 of 330) in the SB11 group and 3.1% (10 of 327) in the ranibizumab group. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings of equivalent efficacy and similar safety and immunogenicity profiles compared with ranibizumab support the use of SB11 for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03150589.

• MeSH
• biosimilární léčivé přípravky škodlivé účinky   farmakokinetika   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• časové faktory MeSH
• dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
• inhibitory angiogeneze škodlivé účinky   farmakokinetika   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• injekce intravitreální MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• makulární degenerace diagnóza   farmakoterapie   patofyziologie   MeSH
• neovaskularizace choroidey diagnóza   farmakoterapie   patofyziologie   MeSH
• obnova funkce MeSH
• ranibizumab škodlivé účinky   farmakokinetika   terapeutické užití   MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• terapeutická ekvivalence MeSH
• vaskulární endoteliální růstový faktor A antagonisté a inhibitory   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• zrak účinky léků   MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• senioři nad 80 let MeSH
• senioři MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• hodnocení ekvivalence MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• multicentrická studie MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH
• srovnávací studie MeSH

BACKGROUND: MSB11022 is a proposed adalimumab biosimilar. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of MSB11022 with reference adalimumab. METHODS: AURIEL-PsO was a double-blind randomized controlled equivalence trial, in which patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis were randomized 1 : 1 to MSB11022 or reference adalimumab. The primary end point was ≥ 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) at week 16, with a prespecified equivalence interval of ± 18%. Patients with a ≥50% improvement in PASI at week 16 were eligible to enter a double-blind extension period: patients receiving MSB11022 continued treatment, and patients receiving reference adalimumab were rerandomized 1 : 1 either to continue reference adalimumab or to switch to MSB11022. Other efficacy end points and safety, immunogenicity and pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated at scheduled visits up to weeks 52 (efficacy and immunogenicity), 54 and 66 (safety). RESULTS: In total, 443 patients were randomized. The difference in PASI 75 response rates at week 16 between the treatment arms was -1·9%, and the 95% confidence interval (-7·8% to 4·1%) was within the prespecified equivalence interval. No notable difference in the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was observed between treatment arms up to the end of the trial, and no new safety signals were observed. Following treatment switch at week 16, no clinically meaningful differences in safety or immunogenicity were seen between treatment arms through to the end of the observation period. CONCLUSIONS: Therapeutic equivalence between MSB11022 and reference adalimumab was demonstrated. AURIEL-PsO provides evidence to support the similarity of both products with regard to efficacy, safety and immunogenicity. What's already known about this topic? Adalimumab is a fully human antitumour necrosis factor-α monoclonal antibody, indicated for the treatment of multiple inflammatory disorders, including psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel diseases and ankylosing spondylitis. MSB11022 is a proposed adalimumab biosimilar that has shown structural and functional similarity to the reference product in an extensive analytical comparability exercise. MSB11022 has demonstrated bioequivalence and comparable safety and immunogenicity profiles in a phase I study in healthy volunteers. What does this study add? This phase III study confirmed equivalent efficacy for MSB11022 and reference adalimumab in patients without any immunomodulation comedication in moderate-to-severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis at week 16. The efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of MSB11022 and reference adalimumab were similar over the respective observation periods (week 52 for efficacy and immunogenicity, week 66 for safety). A switch from reference adalimumab to MSB11022 at week 16 did not impact efficacy, safety or immunogenicity.

• MeSH
• adalimumab * škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• biosimilární léčivé přípravky * škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• psoriáza * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• stupeň závažnosti nemoci MeSH
• terapeutická ekvivalence MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé středního věku MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• mužské pohlaví MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• práce podpořená grantem MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH

BACKGROUND: Sandoz adalimumab SDZ-ADL (GP-2017) is an approved adalimumab biosimilar with similar efficacy and comparable safety and immunogenicity to reference adalimumab (ref-ADL) as confirmed by analytical, pharmacokinetic and confirmatory studies. ADMYRA, a phase III double-blind study, was conducted with an aim to generate efficacy, safety and immunogenicity comparability data in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) having inadequate response to disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) including methotrexate (MTX). The study also evaluated an aspect of 'switching' reference product to the biosimilar in terms of efficacy, safety and immunogenicity up to Week 48. METHODS: Eligible patients (N = 353) were randomized 1:1 to receive subcutaneous (sc) SDZ-ADL 40 mg (n = 177) or ref-ADL (n = 176) every other week from Week 0 to Week 24. At Week 24, all patients with at least a moderate response by Disease Activity Score-28 including high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) in the SDZ-ADL group continued SDZ-ADL (n = 159), and in the ref-ADL group were switched to SDZ-ADL (n = 166), treated for up to 46 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in DAS28-CRP from baseline at Week 12. Other efficacy endpoints included proportion of patients with European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response, EULAR remission, Boolean remission, safety and immunogenicity. RESULTS: The DAS28-CRP score changes from baseline at Week 12 were similar between SDZ-ADL (- 2.16) and ref-ADL (- 2.18) with a mean difference (95% CI) of 0.02 (- 0.24 to 0.27), which was within the pre-specified equivalence margin of ± 0.6. After switching treatment from ref-ADL to SDZ-ADL, the mean DAS28-CRP change was similar between the SDZ-ADL and 'ref-ADL/switched SDZ-ADL' group (- 3.09 vs - 3.05). The proportion of patients with good/moderate EULAR response was 69.2%/29.0% in the SDZ-ADL group and 68.0%/29.6% in the 'ref-ADL/switched SDZ-ADL' group. The proportion of patients in EULAR remission was 51.4% and 54.4% and in Boolean remission was 16.8% and 21.6% for SDZ-ADL and 'ref-ADL/switched SDZ-ADL' groups, respectively. The secondary endpoints were similar across the treatment groups. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) and injection-site reactions were low and similar between SDZ-ADL and 'ref-ADL/switched SDZ-ADL' groups (AEs 70.6% vs 68.8%, injection-site reactions 4.0% vs 6.3%), and most of these patients experienced AEs of mild or moderate severity. Antidrug antibodies were detected in 24.2% and 25.6% of patients treated with SDZ-ADL and 'ref-ADL/switched SDZ-ADL', respectively, from baseline to Week 48, of which 72.5% in SDZ-ADL and 79.1% in 'ref-ADL/switched SDZ-ADL' groups were neutralizing. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with moderate-to-severe RA who had an inadequate response to DMARDs, SDZ-ADL demonstrated a similar efficacy and a comparable safety and immunogenicity profile to ref-ADL. Efficacy was sustained after switching from ref-ADL to SDZ-ADL with no impact on safety (NCT02744755).

• MeSH
• antirevmatika * škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• biosimilární léčivé přípravky * škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• činnosti denního života MeSH
• dvojitá slepá metoda MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• revmatoidní artritida * farmakoterapie   MeSH
• výsledek terapie MeSH
• Check Tag
• lidé MeSH
• ženské pohlaví MeSH
• Publikační typ
• časopisecké články MeSH
• klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH

Riziko vzniku osteoporózy signifikantně narůstá s věkem. S tím je spjat i nárůst rizika fraktur jako nejzávažnější komplikace, která u pacientů ve vyšším věku vede k signifikantnímu nárůstu mortality a morbidity a k významnému snížení kvality života. Teriparatid je prvním anabolickým přípravkem v léčbě osteoporózy. Vstup Forstea na trh v roce 2003 znamenal začátek nové éry v léčbě osteoporózy. Mnoho studií prokázalo pozitivní efekt teriparatidu při intermitentním podávání na nárůst kostní denzity a prevenci obratlových i neobratlových zlomenin, ekonomické náklady na léčbu každého pacienta ale představují významnou zátěž zdravotního systému. Vstup biosimilárního teriparatidu na trh může tyto náklady významně snížit. Biosimilární teriparatid RGB-10 na základě rozsáhlých fyzikálně-chemických a biologických testů prokázal významnou podobnost přípravku RGB-10 na kvalitativní úrovni, dále prokázal stejnou farmakokinetiku i farmakodynamiku jako originální léčivo. Statistická analýza potvrdila formální bioekvivalenci mezi oběma přípravky. Byl prokázán ekvivalentní účinek na nárůst denzity kostního minerálu po 12 měsících léčby. Vzhledem k vysoké shodnosti obou přípravků a obdobnému nárůstu denzity lze očekávat i obdobný efekt na snížení rizika zlomenin. Bezpečnost léčby obou přípravků včetně imunogenicity je obdobná. Na základě vysoké míry podobnosti preklinických dat a průkazu naprosté bioekvivalence byl přípravek RGB-10 (Terrosa) v roce 2017 schválen Evropskou lékovou agenturou k léčbě ve stejných indikacích jako teriparatid.

The risk of osteoporosis increases significantly with age. This is associated with an increase in the risk of fractures as the most serious complication, which in elderly patients leads to a significant increase in mortality and morbidity and a significant reduction in quality of life. Teriparatide is the first anabolic agent in the treatment of osteoporosis. Forsteo's entry into the market in 2003 marked the beginning of a new era in the treatment of osteoporosis. Many studies have shown a positive effect of teriparatide when administered intermittently on the increase in bone density and the prevention of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures, but the economic cost of treating each patient represents a significant burden on the health system. The market entry of biosimilar teriparatide can significantly reduce these costs. Biosimilar teriparatide RGB-10, based on extensive physicochemical and biological tests, demonstrated significant similarity of RGB-10 at a qualitative level, as well as the same pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics as the parent drug. Statistical analysis confirmed formal bioequivalence between the two preparations. An equivalent effect on the increase in bone mineral density after 12 months of treatment has been demonstrated. Thanks to a similar increase in density in both preparations, a similar effect can be expected to reduce the risk of fractures. The safety of treatment with both preparations, including their immunogenicity, is similar. Based on the high degree of similarity of preclinical data and the demonstration of complete bioequivalence, RGB-10 (Terrosa) was approved in 2017 by the European Medicines Agency for treatment in the same indications as teriparatide.

• Klíčová slova
• RGB-10,
• MeSH
• biosimilární léčivé přípravky * aplikace a dávkování   farmakokinetika   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• dospělí MeSH
• fraktury kostí epidemiologie   MeSH
• injekce subkutánní MeSH
• lidé MeSH
• osteoporóza farmakoterapie   komplikace   MeSH
• randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma MeSH
• riziko MeSH
• terapeutická ekvivalence MeSH
• teriparatid * aplikace a dávkování   farmakokinetika   farmakologie   krev   škodlivé účinky   MeSH
• Check Tag
• dospělí MeSH
• lidé MeSH