• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Gemcitabine and carboplatin treatment in patients with relapsing ovarian cancer

J. Šufliarsky, J. Chovanec, D. Svetlovská, T. Minárik, T. Packaň, D. Krošláková, R. Lalabová, L. Heľpianská, D. Horváthová, L. Ševčík, J. Špaček, A. Laluha, V. Tkáčová, V. Malec, G. Rakická, D. Magdin, I. Jančoková, A. Dörr, M. Streško, V....

. 2009 ; 56 (4) : 291-297.

Jazyk angličtina Země Slovensko

Typ dokumentu multicentrická studie, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc11016936

Despite progress in primary treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer, the majority develop recurrence of the disease. A platinum salt treatment, either as monotherapy or in combination with another cytostatic agent, is indicated for patients who have relapsed 6 or more months after primary treatment and thus have platinum-sensitive relapse. Because repeated use of paclitaxel treatment may lead to substantial neurotoxicity, the combination of gemcitabine with carboplatin represents a suitable treatment option, which is widely used in common clinical practice in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. This non-interventional, prospective study observed the effectiveness and tolerability of second-line treatment with gemcitabine and carboplatin in patients with platinum-sensitive relapse of ovarian cancer in routine clinical practice. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the survival and secondary endpoints were to evaluate time to disease progression, objective tumor response rate, and treatment toxicity. Patients were enrolled to planned second-line treatment with gemcitabine and carboplatin (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC 5 on Day 1, and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on Day 8 of a 21-day cycle) for platinum-sensitive relapse of ovarian cancer as a part of routine clinical practice and followed for 12 months. The events (death, tumor progression), tumor response, and maximal grades of toxicity were recorded according to common clinical practice. Survival time (using Kaplan-Meier analysis) and objective tumor response rate were calculated using data forms, and a subgroup analysis was performed using log rank tests for time-to-event endpoints; p-values were also calculated. Response rates were calculated for the whole population; for the subgroups, the Fisher's exact test was performed and only p-values were calculated. Between January 2004 and June 2005, 53 patients were enrolled in the study. The median age was 57 years and 96% of patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) of 0 and 1 at baseline. Approximately 91% of patients were originally diagnosed with stage III or IV; 60% of patients had disease free intervals (DFIs) of 12 or more months from previous therapy, and the additional 40% less than 12 months. The 1-year survival rate was 83%. Median survival time was not determined within the 12-month period following the start of the treatment study due to the limited duration of follow-up. Objective tumour response rate was 67.3%. Most common reasons for discontinuation of therapy were "Planned treatment completed" (53%) and "Tumor progression" (11%). Most common toxicities were leukopenia, anaemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia; grades 3 and 4 of these toxicity types did not exceed 30%. Febrile neutropenia was recorded in two patients. Most common non-haematological toxicities were nausea and vomiting, fatigue, and neuropathy; grades 3 and 4 of these were below 6%. Results on time to disease progression are not published due to inconsistent statistical analysis of reported data. Based on this observation from routine clinical practice, which corresponds with previously published results from controlled clinical trials, the gemcitabine and carboplatin combination seems to be a suitable therapeutic option for patients with platinum-sensitive relapse of ovarian cancer.

000      
06308naa 2200805 a 4500
001      
bmc11016936
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180517131730.0
008      
110628s2009 xo e eng||
009      
AR
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xo
100    1_
$a Šufliarsky, Jozef. $7 xx0185929
245    10
$a Gemcitabine and carboplatin treatment in patients with relapsing ovarian cancer / $c J. Šufliarsky, J. Chovanec, D. Svetlovská, T. Minárik, T. Packaň, D. Krošláková, R. Lalabová, L. Heľpianská, D. Horváthová, L. Ševčík, J. Špaček, A. Laluha, V. Tkáčová, V. Malec, G. Rakická, D. Magdin, I. Jančoková, A. Dörr, M. Streško, V. Habetinek, I. Koza
314    __
$a National Cancer Institute Bratislava, 833 10 Brtaislava, Slovakia, Czech Republic. jozef.sufliarsky@nou.sk
520    9_
$a Despite progress in primary treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer, the majority develop recurrence of the disease. A platinum salt treatment, either as monotherapy or in combination with another cytostatic agent, is indicated for patients who have relapsed 6 or more months after primary treatment and thus have platinum-sensitive relapse. Because repeated use of paclitaxel treatment may lead to substantial neurotoxicity, the combination of gemcitabine with carboplatin represents a suitable treatment option, which is widely used in common clinical practice in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. This non-interventional, prospective study observed the effectiveness and tolerability of second-line treatment with gemcitabine and carboplatin in patients with platinum-sensitive relapse of ovarian cancer in routine clinical practice. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the survival and secondary endpoints were to evaluate time to disease progression, objective tumor response rate, and treatment toxicity. Patients were enrolled to planned second-line treatment with gemcitabine and carboplatin (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC 5 on Day 1, and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on Day 8 of a 21-day cycle) for platinum-sensitive relapse of ovarian cancer as a part of routine clinical practice and followed for 12 months. The events (death, tumor progression), tumor response, and maximal grades of toxicity were recorded according to common clinical practice. Survival time (using Kaplan-Meier analysis) and objective tumor response rate were calculated using data forms, and a subgroup analysis was performed using log rank tests for time-to-event endpoints; p-values were also calculated. Response rates were calculated for the whole population; for the subgroups, the Fisher's exact test was performed and only p-values were calculated. Between January 2004 and June 2005, 53 patients were enrolled in the study. The median age was 57 years and 96% of patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) of 0 and 1 at baseline. Approximately 91% of patients were originally diagnosed with stage III or IV; 60% of patients had disease free intervals (DFIs) of 12 or more months from previous therapy, and the additional 40% less than 12 months. The 1-year survival rate was 83%. Median survival time was not determined within the 12-month period following the start of the treatment study due to the limited duration of follow-up. Objective tumour response rate was 67.3%. Most common reasons for discontinuation of therapy were "Planned treatment completed" (53%) and "Tumor progression" (11%). Most common toxicities were leukopenia, anaemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia; grades 3 and 4 of these toxicity types did not exceed 30%. Febrile neutropenia was recorded in two patients. Most common non-haematological toxicities were nausea and vomiting, fatigue, and neuropathy; grades 3 and 4 of these were below 6%. Results on time to disease progression are not published due to inconsistent statistical analysis of reported data. Based on this observation from routine clinical practice, which corresponds with previously published results from controlled clinical trials, the gemcitabine and carboplatin combination seems to be a suitable therapeutic option for patients with platinum-sensitive relapse of ovarian cancer.
590    __
$a bohemika - dle Pubmed
650    _2
$a mucinózní adenokarcinom $x farmakoterapie $x sekundární $7 D002288
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie $x terapeutické užití $7 D000971
650    _2
$a karboplatina $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D016190
650    _2
$a endometroidní karcinom $x farmakoterapie $x sekundární $7 D018269
650    _2
$a serózní cystadenokarcinom $x farmakoterapie $x sekundární $7 D018284
650    _2
$a deoxycytidin $x analogy a deriváty $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D003841
650    _2
$a progrese nemoci $7 D018450
650    _2
$a nádory endometria $x farmakoterapie $x sekundární $7 D016889
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a imunoenzymatické techniky $7 D007124
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a lokální recidiva nádoru $x farmakoterapie $x patologie $7 D009364
650    _2
$a staging nádorů $7 D009367
650    _2
$a nádory vaječníků $x farmakoterapie $x patologie $7 D010051
650    _2
$a prognóza $7 D011379
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a míra přežití $7 D015996
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Chovanec, Josef, $7 xx0169710 $d 1959-
700    1#
$a Svetlovská, Daniela. $7 _AN066458
700    1#
$a Minárik, Tomáš. $7 _BN001785
700    1_
$a Packaň, Tibor $7 xx0087005
700    0_
$a Krošláková, Daniela. $7 _AN066473
700    1_
$a Kalábová, Renáta, $d 1957- $7 xx0026809
700    1_
$a Heľpianska, Lýdia $7 xx0073823
700    1#
$a Horváthová, D. $7 xx0280024
700    1_
$a Ševčík, Libor, $d 1959- $7 xx0019302
700    1_
$a Špaček, Jiří, $7 xx0143233 $d 1957-
700    1_
$a Laluha, A
700    1_
$a Tkáčová, Valéria $7 xx0139717
700    1_
$a Malec, Vladimír, $d 1952- $7 xx0224374
700    1_
$a Rakicka, G
700    1_
$a Magdin, D
700    1#
$a Jančoková, Iveta. $7 _AN066472
700    1_
$a Dörr, Alfréd $7 xx0070675
700    1#
$a Streško, Marián. $7 xx0229153
700    1_
$a Habětínek, Vladimír $7 xx0137290
700    1_
$a Koza, Ivan, $d 1940-2021 $7 nlk20000080300
773    0_
$t Neoplasma $w MED00003470 $g Roč. 56, č. 4 (2009), s. 291-297 $x 0028-2685
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 1194 $y 2 $z 0
990    __
$a 20110720095111 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180517131907 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 864145 $s 726729
BAS    __
$a 3
BMC    __
$a 2009 $x MED00003470 $b 56 $c 4 $d 291-297 $i 0028-2685 $m Neoplasma $n Neoplasma
LZP    __
$a 2011-3B09/BBjvme

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...