-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Gemcitabine and carboplatin treatment in patients with relapsing ovarian cancer
J. Šufliarsky, J. Chovanec, D. Svetlovská, T. Minárik, T. Packaň, D. Krošláková, R. Lalabová, L. Heľpianská, D. Horváthová, L. Ševčík, J. Špaček, A. Laluha, V. Tkáčová, V. Malec, G. Rakická, D. Magdin, I. Jančoková, A. Dörr, M. Streško, V....
Jazyk angličtina Země Slovensko
Typ dokumentu multicentrická studie, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- deoxycytidin analogy a deriváty aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- endometroidní karcinom farmakoterapie sekundární MeSH
- imunoenzymatické techniky MeSH
- karboplatina aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lokální recidiva nádoru farmakoterapie patologie MeSH
- míra přežití MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mucinózní adenokarcinom farmakoterapie sekundární MeSH
- nádory endometria farmakoterapie sekundární MeSH
- nádory vaječníků farmakoterapie patologie MeSH
- prognóza MeSH
- progrese nemoci MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie terapeutické užití MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- serózní cystadenokarcinom farmakoterapie sekundární MeSH
- staging nádorů MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Despite progress in primary treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer, the majority develop recurrence of the disease. A platinum salt treatment, either as monotherapy or in combination with another cytostatic agent, is indicated for patients who have relapsed 6 or more months after primary treatment and thus have platinum-sensitive relapse. Because repeated use of paclitaxel treatment may lead to substantial neurotoxicity, the combination of gemcitabine with carboplatin represents a suitable treatment option, which is widely used in common clinical practice in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. This non-interventional, prospective study observed the effectiveness and tolerability of second-line treatment with gemcitabine and carboplatin in patients with platinum-sensitive relapse of ovarian cancer in routine clinical practice. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the survival and secondary endpoints were to evaluate time to disease progression, objective tumor response rate, and treatment toxicity. Patients were enrolled to planned second-line treatment with gemcitabine and carboplatin (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC 5 on Day 1, and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on Day 8 of a 21-day cycle) for platinum-sensitive relapse of ovarian cancer as a part of routine clinical practice and followed for 12 months. The events (death, tumor progression), tumor response, and maximal grades of toxicity were recorded according to common clinical practice. Survival time (using Kaplan-Meier analysis) and objective tumor response rate were calculated using data forms, and a subgroup analysis was performed using log rank tests for time-to-event endpoints; p-values were also calculated. Response rates were calculated for the whole population; for the subgroups, the Fisher's exact test was performed and only p-values were calculated. Between January 2004 and June 2005, 53 patients were enrolled in the study. The median age was 57 years and 96% of patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) of 0 and 1 at baseline. Approximately 91% of patients were originally diagnosed with stage III or IV; 60% of patients had disease free intervals (DFIs) of 12 or more months from previous therapy, and the additional 40% less than 12 months. The 1-year survival rate was 83%. Median survival time was not determined within the 12-month period following the start of the treatment study due to the limited duration of follow-up. Objective tumour response rate was 67.3%. Most common reasons for discontinuation of therapy were "Planned treatment completed" (53%) and "Tumor progression" (11%). Most common toxicities were leukopenia, anaemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia; grades 3 and 4 of these toxicity types did not exceed 30%. Febrile neutropenia was recorded in two patients. Most common non-haematological toxicities were nausea and vomiting, fatigue, and neuropathy; grades 3 and 4 of these were below 6%. Results on time to disease progression are not published due to inconsistent statistical analysis of reported data. Based on this observation from routine clinical practice, which corresponds with previously published results from controlled clinical trials, the gemcitabine and carboplatin combination seems to be a suitable therapeutic option for patients with platinum-sensitive relapse of ovarian cancer.
- 000
- 06308naa 2200805 a 4500
- 001
- bmc11016936
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20180517131730.0
- 008
- 110628s2009 xo e eng||
- 009
- AR
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xo
- 100 1_
- $a Šufliarsky, Jozef. $7 xx0185929
- 245 10
- $a Gemcitabine and carboplatin treatment in patients with relapsing ovarian cancer / $c J. Šufliarsky, J. Chovanec, D. Svetlovská, T. Minárik, T. Packaň, D. Krošláková, R. Lalabová, L. Heľpianská, D. Horváthová, L. Ševčík, J. Špaček, A. Laluha, V. Tkáčová, V. Malec, G. Rakická, D. Magdin, I. Jančoková, A. Dörr, M. Streško, V. Habetinek, I. Koza
- 314 __
- $a National Cancer Institute Bratislava, 833 10 Brtaislava, Slovakia, Czech Republic. jozef.sufliarsky@nou.sk
- 520 9_
- $a Despite progress in primary treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer, the majority develop recurrence of the disease. A platinum salt treatment, either as monotherapy or in combination with another cytostatic agent, is indicated for patients who have relapsed 6 or more months after primary treatment and thus have platinum-sensitive relapse. Because repeated use of paclitaxel treatment may lead to substantial neurotoxicity, the combination of gemcitabine with carboplatin represents a suitable treatment option, which is widely used in common clinical practice in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. This non-interventional, prospective study observed the effectiveness and tolerability of second-line treatment with gemcitabine and carboplatin in patients with platinum-sensitive relapse of ovarian cancer in routine clinical practice. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the survival and secondary endpoints were to evaluate time to disease progression, objective tumor response rate, and treatment toxicity. Patients were enrolled to planned second-line treatment with gemcitabine and carboplatin (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC 5 on Day 1, and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on Day 8 of a 21-day cycle) for platinum-sensitive relapse of ovarian cancer as a part of routine clinical practice and followed for 12 months. The events (death, tumor progression), tumor response, and maximal grades of toxicity were recorded according to common clinical practice. Survival time (using Kaplan-Meier analysis) and objective tumor response rate were calculated using data forms, and a subgroup analysis was performed using log rank tests for time-to-event endpoints; p-values were also calculated. Response rates were calculated for the whole population; for the subgroups, the Fisher's exact test was performed and only p-values were calculated. Between January 2004 and June 2005, 53 patients were enrolled in the study. The median age was 57 years and 96% of patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) of 0 and 1 at baseline. Approximately 91% of patients were originally diagnosed with stage III or IV; 60% of patients had disease free intervals (DFIs) of 12 or more months from previous therapy, and the additional 40% less than 12 months. The 1-year survival rate was 83%. Median survival time was not determined within the 12-month period following the start of the treatment study due to the limited duration of follow-up. Objective tumour response rate was 67.3%. Most common reasons for discontinuation of therapy were "Planned treatment completed" (53%) and "Tumor progression" (11%). Most common toxicities were leukopenia, anaemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia; grades 3 and 4 of these toxicity types did not exceed 30%. Febrile neutropenia was recorded in two patients. Most common non-haematological toxicities were nausea and vomiting, fatigue, and neuropathy; grades 3 and 4 of these were below 6%. Results on time to disease progression are not published due to inconsistent statistical analysis of reported data. Based on this observation from routine clinical practice, which corresponds with previously published results from controlled clinical trials, the gemcitabine and carboplatin combination seems to be a suitable therapeutic option for patients with platinum-sensitive relapse of ovarian cancer.
- 590 __
- $a bohemika - dle Pubmed
- 650 _2
- $a mucinózní adenokarcinom $x farmakoterapie $x sekundární $7 D002288
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 _2
- $a protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie $x terapeutické užití $7 D000971
- 650 _2
- $a karboplatina $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D016190
- 650 _2
- $a endometroidní karcinom $x farmakoterapie $x sekundární $7 D018269
- 650 _2
- $a serózní cystadenokarcinom $x farmakoterapie $x sekundární $7 D018284
- 650 _2
- $a deoxycytidin $x analogy a deriváty $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D003841
- 650 _2
- $a progrese nemoci $7 D018450
- 650 _2
- $a nádory endometria $x farmakoterapie $x sekundární $7 D016889
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a imunoenzymatické techniky $7 D007124
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a lokální recidiva nádoru $x farmakoterapie $x patologie $7 D009364
- 650 _2
- $a staging nádorů $7 D009367
- 650 _2
- $a nádory vaječníků $x farmakoterapie $x patologie $7 D010051
- 650 _2
- $a prognóza $7 D011379
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a míra přežití $7 D015996
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Chovanec, Josef, $7 xx0169710 $d 1959-
- 700 1#
- $a Svetlovská, Daniela. $7 _AN066458
- 700 1#
- $a Minárik, Tomáš. $7 _BN001785
- 700 1_
- $a Packaň, Tibor $7 xx0087005
- 700 0_
- $a Krošláková, Daniela. $7 _AN066473
- 700 1_
- $a Kalábová, Renáta, $d 1957- $7 xx0026809
- 700 1_
- $a Heľpianska, Lýdia $7 xx0073823
- 700 1#
- $a Horváthová, D. $7 xx0280024
- 700 1_
- $a Ševčík, Libor, $d 1959- $7 xx0019302
- 700 1_
- $a Špaček, Jiří, $7 xx0143233 $d 1957-
- 700 1_
- $a Laluha, A
- 700 1_
- $a Tkáčová, Valéria $7 xx0139717
- 700 1_
- $a Malec, Vladimír, $d 1952- $7 xx0224374
- 700 1_
- $a Rakicka, G
- 700 1_
- $a Magdin, D
- 700 1#
- $a Jančoková, Iveta. $7 _AN066472
- 700 1_
- $a Dörr, Alfréd $7 xx0070675
- 700 1#
- $a Streško, Marián. $7 xx0229153
- 700 1_
- $a Habětínek, Vladimír $7 xx0137290
- 700 1_
- $a Koza, Ivan, $d 1940-2021 $7 nlk20000080300
- 773 0_
- $t Neoplasma $w MED00003470 $g Roč. 56, č. 4 (2009), s. 291-297 $x 0028-2685
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 1194 $y 2 $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20110720095111 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20180517131907 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 864145 $s 726729
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2009 $x MED00003470 $b 56 $c 4 $d 291-297 $i 0028-2685 $m Neoplasma $n Neoplasma
- LZP __
- $a 2011-3B09/BBjvme