Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Quadriplex model enhances urine-based detection of prostate cancer

T. Jamaspishvili, M. Kral, I. Khomeriki, V. Vyhnankova, G. Mgebrishvili, V. Student, Z. Kolar, J. Bouchal

. 2011 ; 14 (4) : 354-360.

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc12034921

Grantová podpora
NS9940 MZ0 CEP - Centrální evidence projektů

Digitální knihovna NLK
Plný text - Článek
Zdroj

E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 2000-07-01 do Před 1 rokem
Open Access Digital Library od 1997-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 1997-09-01 do 2015-12-31
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 2000-07-01 do Před 1 rokem
Public Health Database (ProQuest) od 2000-07-01 do Před 1 rokem

BACKGROUND: The major advantages of urine-based assays are their non-invasive character and ability to monitor prostate cancer (CaP) with heterogeneous foci. While the test for the prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) is commercially available, the aim of our research was to test other putative urine markers in multiplex settings (AMACR (α-methylacyl-CoA racemase), EZH2 (enhancer of zeste homolog 2), GOLM1 (golgi membrane protein 1), MSMB (microseminoprotein, β), SPINK1 (serine peptidase inhibitor) and TRPM8 (transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily M, member 8)). METHODS: Expression of the candidate biomarkers was studied in sedimented urine using quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction in two sets of patients with and without restriction on serum PSA levels. RESULTS: We confirmed that PCA3 is an independent predictor of cancer in the patients without restriction of serum PSA values (set 1, n=176, PSA=0.1-587 ng ml(-1)). However, AMACR was the only parameter that differentiated CaP from non-CaP patients with serum PSA between 3 and 15 ng ml(-1) (set 2, n=104). The area under curve (AUC) for this gene was 0.645 with both sensitivity and specificity at 65%. Further improvement was achieved by multivariate logistic regression analysis, which identified novel duplex (TRPM8 and MSMB), triplex (plus AMACR) and quadriplex (plus PCA3) models for the detection of early CaPs (AUC=0.665, 0.726 and 0.741, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Novel quadriplex test could be implemented as an adjunct to serum PSA or urine PCA3 and this could improve decision making for diagnostics in the case of 'PSA dilemma' patients.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc12034921
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20160805153948.0
007      
ta
008      
121023s2011 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1038/pcan.2011.32 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)21788966
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Jamaspishvili, T $7 xx0281436 $u Department of Clinical and Molecular Pathology, Laboratory of Molecular Pathology, Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Palacky University and University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Quadriplex model enhances urine-based detection of prostate cancer / $c T. Jamaspishvili, M. Kral, I. Khomeriki, V. Vyhnankova, G. Mgebrishvili, V. Student, Z. Kolar, J. Bouchal
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: The major advantages of urine-based assays are their non-invasive character and ability to monitor prostate cancer (CaP) with heterogeneous foci. While the test for the prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3) is commercially available, the aim of our research was to test other putative urine markers in multiplex settings (AMACR (α-methylacyl-CoA racemase), EZH2 (enhancer of zeste homolog 2), GOLM1 (golgi membrane protein 1), MSMB (microseminoprotein, β), SPINK1 (serine peptidase inhibitor) and TRPM8 (transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily M, member 8)). METHODS: Expression of the candidate biomarkers was studied in sedimented urine using quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction in two sets of patients with and without restriction on serum PSA levels. RESULTS: We confirmed that PCA3 is an independent predictor of cancer in the patients without restriction of serum PSA values (set 1, n=176, PSA=0.1-587 ng ml(-1)). However, AMACR was the only parameter that differentiated CaP from non-CaP patients with serum PSA between 3 and 15 ng ml(-1) (set 2, n=104). The area under curve (AUC) for this gene was 0.645 with both sensitivity and specificity at 65%. Further improvement was achieved by multivariate logistic regression analysis, which identified novel duplex (TRPM8 and MSMB), triplex (plus AMACR) and quadriplex (plus PCA3) models for the detection of early CaPs (AUC=0.665, 0.726 and 0.741, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Novel quadriplex test could be implemented as an adjunct to serum PSA or urine PCA3 and this could improve decision making for diagnostics in the case of 'PSA dilemma' patients.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a antigeny nádorové $x moč $7 D000951
650    _2
$a časná detekce nádoru $7 D055088
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a statistické modely $7 D015233
650    _2
$a prostatický specifický antigen $x krev $7 D017430
650    _2
$a nádory prostaty $x diagnóza $x genetika $x moč $7 D011471
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
650    _2
$a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
650    _2
$a nádorové biomarkery $x genetika $x moč $7 D014408
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Král, Milan $7 xx0079094 $u Department of Urology, University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Khomeriki, Irakli $7 _AN065375 $u Department of Urology, University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Vyhnánková, Vlasta $7 xx0171105 $u Department of Urology, University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Mgebrishvili, Giorgi $7 _AN065376 $u Department of Clinical and Molecular Pathology, Laboratory of Molecular Pathology, Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Palacky University and University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Študent, Vladimír, $d 1958- $7 ola2003199603 $u Department of Urology, University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kolář, Zdeněk, $d 1953- $7 jn20000710256 $u Department of Clinical and Molecular Pathology, Laboratory of Molecular Pathology, Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Palacky University and University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Bouchal, Jan, $d 1973- $7 xx0034399 $u Department of Clinical and Molecular Pathology, Laboratory of Molecular Pathology, Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Palacky University and University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00008064 $t Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases $x 1476-5608 $g Roč. 14, č. 4 (2011), s. 354-360
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21788966 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20121023 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20160805154223 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 956931 $s 792418
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2011 $b 14 $c 4 $d 354-360 $i 1476-5608 $m Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases $n Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis $x MED00008064
GRA    __
$a NS9940 $p MZ0
LZP    __
$b NLK112 $a Pubmed-20121023

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...