-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
No evidence of disease activity in patients receiving daclizumab versus intramuscular interferon beta-1a for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the DECIDE study
L. Kappos, E. Havrdova, G. Giovannoni, BO. Khatri, SA. Gauthier, SJ. Greenberg, X. You, P. Wang, G. Giannattasio,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie
PubMed
28080250
DOI
10.1177/1352458516683266
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- adjuvancia imunologická aplikace a dávkování farmakologie MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- hodnocení výsledků zdravotní péče metody MeSH
- humanizované monoklonální protilátky aplikace a dávkování farmakologie MeSH
- imunoglobulin G aplikace a dávkování farmakologie MeSH
- imunosupresiva aplikace a dávkování farmakologie MeSH
- injekce intramuskulární MeSH
- injekce subkutánní MeSH
- interferon beta 1a aplikace a dávkování farmakologie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- relabující-remitující roztroušená skleróza diagnostické zobrazování farmakoterapie patofyziologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: No evidence of disease activity (NEDA) is a composite endpoint being increasingly applied as an outcome measure in clinical trials as well as proposed for individual therapeutic decisions in multiple sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVE: Assess the proportion of patients with relapsing-remitting MS achieving NEDA in the DECIDE study of daclizumab 150 mg subcutaneous versus intramuscular interferon beta-1a 30 µg for 96-144 weeks. METHODS: NEDA was defined as no relapses, no onset of 12-week confirmed disability progression (CDP), no new/newly enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions (NET2), and no gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) lesions. Logistic regression models adjusted for baseline covariates compared treatment groups for baseline to week 96, weeks 0-24, and weeks 24-96. RESULTS: From baseline to week 96, more daclizumab versus intramuscular interferon beta-1a patients achieved NEDA (24.6% vs 14.2%; odds ratio (OR; 95% confidence interval): 2.059 (1.592-2.661); p < 0.0001). ORs for clinical NEDA (no relapses, no CDP) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) NEDA (no NET2, no Gd+ lesions) were 1.651 (1.357-2.007; p < 0.0001) and 2.051 (1.628-2.582; p < 0.0001), respectively. ORs in favor of daclizumab for weeks 24-96 were consistently higher than for weeks 0-24. CONCLUSION: More daclizumab versus intramuscular interferon beta-1a patients achieved NEDA early in DECIDE, with effects increasing over time.
Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry Queen Mary University of London London UK
Department of Neurology 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Prague Czech Republic
Judith Jaffe Multiple Sclerosis Center Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY USA
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18025197
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20180710093801.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 180709s2017 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1177/1352458516683266 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)28080250
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Kappos, Ludwig $u Neurology Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
- 245 10
- $a No evidence of disease activity in patients receiving daclizumab versus intramuscular interferon beta-1a for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the DECIDE study / $c L. Kappos, E. Havrdova, G. Giovannoni, BO. Khatri, SA. Gauthier, SJ. Greenberg, X. You, P. Wang, G. Giannattasio,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: No evidence of disease activity (NEDA) is a composite endpoint being increasingly applied as an outcome measure in clinical trials as well as proposed for individual therapeutic decisions in multiple sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVE: Assess the proportion of patients with relapsing-remitting MS achieving NEDA in the DECIDE study of daclizumab 150 mg subcutaneous versus intramuscular interferon beta-1a 30 µg for 96-144 weeks. METHODS: NEDA was defined as no relapses, no onset of 12-week confirmed disability progression (CDP), no new/newly enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions (NET2), and no gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) lesions. Logistic regression models adjusted for baseline covariates compared treatment groups for baseline to week 96, weeks 0-24, and weeks 24-96. RESULTS: From baseline to week 96, more daclizumab versus intramuscular interferon beta-1a patients achieved NEDA (24.6% vs 14.2%; odds ratio (OR; 95% confidence interval): 2.059 (1.592-2.661); p < 0.0001). ORs for clinical NEDA (no relapses, no CDP) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) NEDA (no NET2, no Gd+ lesions) were 1.651 (1.357-2.007; p < 0.0001) and 2.051 (1.628-2.582; p < 0.0001), respectively. ORs in favor of daclizumab for weeks 24-96 were consistently higher than for weeks 0-24. CONCLUSION: More daclizumab versus intramuscular interferon beta-1a patients achieved NEDA early in DECIDE, with effects increasing over time.
- 650 _2
- $a adjuvancia imunologická $x aplikace a dávkování $x farmakologie $7 D000276
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a humanizované monoklonální protilátky $x aplikace a dávkování $x farmakologie $7 D061067
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a imunoglobulin G $x aplikace a dávkování $x farmakologie $7 D007074
- 650 _2
- $a imunosupresiva $x aplikace a dávkování $x farmakologie $7 D007166
- 650 _2
- $a injekce intramuskulární $7 D007273
- 650 _2
- $a injekce subkutánní $7 D007279
- 650 _2
- $a interferon beta 1a $x aplikace a dávkování $x farmakologie $7 D000068556
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a relabující-remitující roztroušená skleróza $x diagnostické zobrazování $x farmakoterapie $x patofyziologie $7 D020529
- 650 _2
- $a hodnocení výsledků zdravotní péče $x metody $7 D017063
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 700 1_
- $a Havrdova, Eva $u Department of Neurology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Giovannoni, Gavin $u Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
- 700 1_
- $a Khatri, Bhupendra O $u Center for Neurological Disorders and The Regional Multiple Sclerosis Center, Wheaton Franciscan Health Care, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Gauthier, Susan A $u Judith Jaffe Multiple Sclerosis Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Greenberg, Steven J $u AbbVie, North Chicago, IL, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a You, Xiaojun $u Biogen, Cambridge, MA, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Wang, Ping $u Biogen, Cambridge, MA, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Giannattasio, Giorgio $u Biogen, Zug, Switzerland.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00006389 $t Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) $x 1477-0970 $g Roč. 23, č. 13 (2017), s. 1736-1747
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28080250 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20180709 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20180710094051 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1317328 $s 1022118
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2017 $b 23 $c 13 $d 1736-1747 $e 20161222 $i 1477-0970 $m Multiple sclerosis $n Mult Scler $x MED00006389
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20180709