Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Optimal participation in decision-making in advanced chronic disease: perspectives of patients, relatives and physicians

A. Houska, A. Tučková, K. Vlčková, K. Poláková, M. Loučka

. 2021 ; 10 (4) : 3951-3959. [pub] 20210304

Jazyk angličtina Země Čína

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc21018889

BACKGROUND: Making decisions about health care issues in advanced illness is difficult and the participation of patients and relatives is essential. Most of the studies on shared decision-making focus on the interaction between patient and physician (dyadic interaction), while the role of relatives in triadic decision-making remains less explored. The aim of the study was to investigate the perceived importance of the role of the patient, the physician and the relative in the decision-making from their respective perspectives. METHODS: Patients (n=154) with advanced disease, their relatives (n=95) and physicians (n=108) were asked to rank the importance of their roles on the scale from 0 to 10. Differences between respondent groups were examined by ANOVA. A typology of answers was constructed for dyadic and triadic relations and analyzed by descriptive statistics and the chi-square test. RESULTS: Physicians rated the importance of patients' role in decision-making significantly higher [mean 9.31; 95% confidence interval (CI): 9.07-9.55] than did patients themselves (mean 7.85; 95% CI: 7.37-8.32), while patients and relatives rated higher the importance of the physicians' role (mean 9.29; 95% CI: 8.98-9.59 and mean 9.20; 95% CI: 8.96-9.45, respectively) than did physicians themselves (mean 8.35; 95% CI: 0.06-8.65). In the analysis of the patient-physician dyadic interaction, patients ranked their role as equally important (44.1%) or more important (11.2%) than the role of physicians. Physicians (56.5%) thought patients should play a more important role. When relatives were included in the analysis, patients either preferred equal role of the three actors (30.2%) or prioritized the role of the physician and the relatives (16.8%), while physicians and relatives prioritized the role of the patient (54.6% and 29.0%, respectively). All results were statistically significant (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Physicians and relatives tend to accentuate the active role of patients, while patients mostly prefer shared decision-making. Physicians seem to underestimate the importance of the role of relatives, compared to patients and relatives for whom the participation of relatives in the decision-making is of greater importance. A triadic decision-making model that acknowledges the importance of all three actors should be implemented in decision-making process in advanced illness.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21018889
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20211012145858.0
007      
ta
008      
210728s2021 cc f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.21037/apm-20-2368 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)33691440
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a cc
100    1_
$a Houska, Adam $u Center for Palliative Care, Prague, Czech Republic; st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Optimal participation in decision-making in advanced chronic disease: perspectives of patients, relatives and physicians / $c A. Houska, A. Tučková, K. Vlčková, K. Poláková, M. Loučka
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Making decisions about health care issues in advanced illness is difficult and the participation of patients and relatives is essential. Most of the studies on shared decision-making focus on the interaction between patient and physician (dyadic interaction), while the role of relatives in triadic decision-making remains less explored. The aim of the study was to investigate the perceived importance of the role of the patient, the physician and the relative in the decision-making from their respective perspectives. METHODS: Patients (n=154) with advanced disease, their relatives (n=95) and physicians (n=108) were asked to rank the importance of their roles on the scale from 0 to 10. Differences between respondent groups were examined by ANOVA. A typology of answers was constructed for dyadic and triadic relations and analyzed by descriptive statistics and the chi-square test. RESULTS: Physicians rated the importance of patients' role in decision-making significantly higher [mean 9.31; 95% confidence interval (CI): 9.07-9.55] than did patients themselves (mean 7.85; 95% CI: 7.37-8.32), while patients and relatives rated higher the importance of the physicians' role (mean 9.29; 95% CI: 8.98-9.59 and mean 9.20; 95% CI: 8.96-9.45, respectively) than did physicians themselves (mean 8.35; 95% CI: 0.06-8.65). In the analysis of the patient-physician dyadic interaction, patients ranked their role as equally important (44.1%) or more important (11.2%) than the role of physicians. Physicians (56.5%) thought patients should play a more important role. When relatives were included in the analysis, patients either preferred equal role of the three actors (30.2%) or prioritized the role of the physician and the relatives (16.8%), while physicians and relatives prioritized the role of the patient (54.6% and 29.0%, respectively). All results were statistically significant (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Physicians and relatives tend to accentuate the active role of patients, while patients mostly prefer shared decision-making. Physicians seem to underestimate the importance of the role of relatives, compared to patients and relatives for whom the participation of relatives in the decision-making is of greater importance. A triadic decision-making model that acknowledges the importance of all three actors should be implemented in decision-making process in advanced illness.
650    _2
$a chronická nemoc $7 D002908
650    _2
$a rozhodování $7 D003657
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a zapojení pacienta $7 D010358
650    _2
$a vztahy mezi lékařem a pacientem $7 D010817
650    12
$a lékaři $7 D010820
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Tučková, Anna $u Center for Palliative Care, Prague, Czech Republic; st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Vlčková, Karolína $u Center for Palliative Care, Prague, Czech Republic; st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Poláková, Kristýna, $u Center for Palliative Care, Prague, Czech Republic; st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $d 1980- $7 xx0264792
700    1_
$a Loučka, Martin $u Center for Palliative Care, Prague, Czech Republic; st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00195445 $t Annals of palliative medicine $x 2224-5839 $g Roč. 10, č. 4 (2021), s. 3951-3959
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33691440 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210728 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20211012145854 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1689853 $s 1139335
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 10 $c 4 $d 3951-3959 $e 20210304 $i 2224-5839 $m Annals of palliative medicine $n Ann Palliat Med $x MED00195445
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210728

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...