-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Optimal participation in decision-making in advanced chronic disease: perspectives of patients, relatives and physicians
A. Houska, A. Tučková, K. Vlčková, K. Poláková, M. Loučka
Jazyk angličtina Země Čína
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
33691440
DOI
10.21037/apm-20-2368
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- chronická nemoc MeSH
- lékaři * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- rozhodování MeSH
- vztahy mezi lékařem a pacientem MeSH
- zapojení pacienta * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Making decisions about health care issues in advanced illness is difficult and the participation of patients and relatives is essential. Most of the studies on shared decision-making focus on the interaction between patient and physician (dyadic interaction), while the role of relatives in triadic decision-making remains less explored. The aim of the study was to investigate the perceived importance of the role of the patient, the physician and the relative in the decision-making from their respective perspectives. METHODS: Patients (n=154) with advanced disease, their relatives (n=95) and physicians (n=108) were asked to rank the importance of their roles on the scale from 0 to 10. Differences between respondent groups were examined by ANOVA. A typology of answers was constructed for dyadic and triadic relations and analyzed by descriptive statistics and the chi-square test. RESULTS: Physicians rated the importance of patients' role in decision-making significantly higher [mean 9.31; 95% confidence interval (CI): 9.07-9.55] than did patients themselves (mean 7.85; 95% CI: 7.37-8.32), while patients and relatives rated higher the importance of the physicians' role (mean 9.29; 95% CI: 8.98-9.59 and mean 9.20; 95% CI: 8.96-9.45, respectively) than did physicians themselves (mean 8.35; 95% CI: 0.06-8.65). In the analysis of the patient-physician dyadic interaction, patients ranked their role as equally important (44.1%) or more important (11.2%) than the role of physicians. Physicians (56.5%) thought patients should play a more important role. When relatives were included in the analysis, patients either preferred equal role of the three actors (30.2%) or prioritized the role of the physician and the relatives (16.8%), while physicians and relatives prioritized the role of the patient (54.6% and 29.0%, respectively). All results were statistically significant (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Physicians and relatives tend to accentuate the active role of patients, while patients mostly prefer shared decision-making. Physicians seem to underestimate the importance of the role of relatives, compared to patients and relatives for whom the participation of relatives in the decision-making is of greater importance. A triadic decision-making model that acknowledges the importance of all three actors should be implemented in decision-making process in advanced illness.
Center for Palliative Care Prague Czech Republic
rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21018889
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20211012145858.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210728s2021 cc f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.21037/apm-20-2368 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33691440
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a cc
- 100 1_
- $a Houska, Adam $u Center for Palliative Care, Prague, Czech Republic; st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Optimal participation in decision-making in advanced chronic disease: perspectives of patients, relatives and physicians / $c A. Houska, A. Tučková, K. Vlčková, K. Poláková, M. Loučka
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Making decisions about health care issues in advanced illness is difficult and the participation of patients and relatives is essential. Most of the studies on shared decision-making focus on the interaction between patient and physician (dyadic interaction), while the role of relatives in triadic decision-making remains less explored. The aim of the study was to investigate the perceived importance of the role of the patient, the physician and the relative in the decision-making from their respective perspectives. METHODS: Patients (n=154) with advanced disease, their relatives (n=95) and physicians (n=108) were asked to rank the importance of their roles on the scale from 0 to 10. Differences between respondent groups were examined by ANOVA. A typology of answers was constructed for dyadic and triadic relations and analyzed by descriptive statistics and the chi-square test. RESULTS: Physicians rated the importance of patients' role in decision-making significantly higher [mean 9.31; 95% confidence interval (CI): 9.07-9.55] than did patients themselves (mean 7.85; 95% CI: 7.37-8.32), while patients and relatives rated higher the importance of the physicians' role (mean 9.29; 95% CI: 8.98-9.59 and mean 9.20; 95% CI: 8.96-9.45, respectively) than did physicians themselves (mean 8.35; 95% CI: 0.06-8.65). In the analysis of the patient-physician dyadic interaction, patients ranked their role as equally important (44.1%) or more important (11.2%) than the role of physicians. Physicians (56.5%) thought patients should play a more important role. When relatives were included in the analysis, patients either preferred equal role of the three actors (30.2%) or prioritized the role of the physician and the relatives (16.8%), while physicians and relatives prioritized the role of the patient (54.6% and 29.0%, respectively). All results were statistically significant (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Physicians and relatives tend to accentuate the active role of patients, while patients mostly prefer shared decision-making. Physicians seem to underestimate the importance of the role of relatives, compared to patients and relatives for whom the participation of relatives in the decision-making is of greater importance. A triadic decision-making model that acknowledges the importance of all three actors should be implemented in decision-making process in advanced illness.
- 650 _2
- $a chronická nemoc $7 D002908
- 650 _2
- $a rozhodování $7 D003657
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a zapojení pacienta $7 D010358
- 650 _2
- $a vztahy mezi lékařem a pacientem $7 D010817
- 650 12
- $a lékaři $7 D010820
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Tučková, Anna $u Center for Palliative Care, Prague, Czech Republic; st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Vlčková, Karolína $u Center for Palliative Care, Prague, Czech Republic; st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Poláková, Kristýna, $u Center for Palliative Care, Prague, Czech Republic; st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $d 1980- $7 xx0264792
- 700 1_
- $a Loučka, Martin $u Center for Palliative Care, Prague, Czech Republic; st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00195445 $t Annals of palliative medicine $x 2224-5839 $g Roč. 10, č. 4 (2021), s. 3951-3959
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33691440 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210728 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20211012145854 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1689853 $s 1139335
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 10 $c 4 $d 3951-3959 $e 20210304 $i 2224-5839 $m Annals of palliative medicine $n Ann Palliat Med $x MED00195445
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210728