Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

The conversion factor for predicting adenoma detection rate from polyp detection rate varies according to colonoscopy indication and patient sex

G. Vojtechova, O. Ngo, T. Grega, K. Kmochova, M. Voska, B. Buckova, O. Majek, M. Zavoral, S. Suchanek

. 2020 ; 29 (4) : 294-302. [pub] -

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc21026654

Grantová podpora
NV16-29614A MZ0 CEP - Centrální evidence projektů

The adenoma detection rate (ADR) is the primary quality indicator for colonoscopies. The polyp detection rate (PDR) is available from administrative data and does not depend on histology verification. The correlation between PDR and ADR and the ADR/PDR conversion factor in preventive colonoscopies were evaluated. In the prospective study, asymptomatic individuals aged 45-75 years with preventive colonoscopy in 2012-2016 were included. Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to assess PDR/ADR for each endoscopist. Conversion factor predicting ADR from PDR was obtained by linear regression and subsequently compared with adenoma to polyp detection rate quotient. One thousand six hundred fourteen preventive colonoscopies performed by 16 endoscopists in 8 screening colonoscopy centres in the Czech Republic were analysed. Correlation between PDR and ADR in all preventive colonoscopies was high and statistically significant (Rs 0.82; P < 0.001). There was a strong correlation between PDR and ADR in men (Rs 0.74; P = 0.002) and in screening colonoscopies (Rs 0.85; P < 0.001). The conversion factor to convert ADR from PDR was 0.72 in all preventive colonoscopies, 0.76 in FOBT+ colonoscopies and 0.67 in screening colonoscopies. ADR may be replaced by PDR in the assessment of colonoscopy quality. The value of the conversion factor varies according to colonoscopy indication and gender of examined individuals; in this Czech study, it was 0.72 in all preventive colonoscopies. The minimum requested ADR of 25 % corresponds to a PDR of 35 %, when converted with the appropriate conversion factor.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21026654
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20211026132722.0
007      
ta
008      
211013s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000558 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32543806
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Vojtechova, Gabriela $u Department of Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Military University Hospital, Prague
245    14
$a The conversion factor for predicting adenoma detection rate from polyp detection rate varies according to colonoscopy indication and patient sex / $c G. Vojtechova, O. Ngo, T. Grega, K. Kmochova, M. Voska, B. Buckova, O. Majek, M. Zavoral, S. Suchanek
520    9_
$a The adenoma detection rate (ADR) is the primary quality indicator for colonoscopies. The polyp detection rate (PDR) is available from administrative data and does not depend on histology verification. The correlation between PDR and ADR and the ADR/PDR conversion factor in preventive colonoscopies were evaluated. In the prospective study, asymptomatic individuals aged 45-75 years with preventive colonoscopy in 2012-2016 were included. Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to assess PDR/ADR for each endoscopist. Conversion factor predicting ADR from PDR was obtained by linear regression and subsequently compared with adenoma to polyp detection rate quotient. One thousand six hundred fourteen preventive colonoscopies performed by 16 endoscopists in 8 screening colonoscopy centres in the Czech Republic were analysed. Correlation between PDR and ADR in all preventive colonoscopies was high and statistically significant (Rs 0.82; P < 0.001). There was a strong correlation between PDR and ADR in men (Rs 0.74; P = 0.002) and in screening colonoscopies (Rs 0.85; P < 0.001). The conversion factor to convert ADR from PDR was 0.72 in all preventive colonoscopies, 0.76 in FOBT+ colonoscopies and 0.67 in screening colonoscopies. ADR may be replaced by PDR in the assessment of colonoscopy quality. The value of the conversion factor varies according to colonoscopy indication and gender of examined individuals; in this Czech study, it was 0.72 in all preventive colonoscopies. The minimum requested ADR of 25 % corresponds to a PDR of 35 %, when converted with the appropriate conversion factor.
650    _2
$a adenom $x diagnóza $x epidemiologie $x patologie $x prevence a kontrola $7 D000236
650    _2
$a administrativní požadavky na zdravotní péči $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D000067575
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a kolon $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D003106
650    _2
$a polypy tlustého střeva $x diagnóza $x epidemiologie $x patologie $7 D003111
650    _2
$a kolonoskopie $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D003113
650    _2
$a kolorektální nádory $x diagnóza $x epidemiologie $x patologie $x prevence a kontrola $7 D015179
650    _2
$a časná detekce nádoru $x metody $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D055088
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a střevní sliznice $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patologie $7 D007413
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a plošný screening $x metody $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D008403
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a hodnocení rizik $x metody $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D018570
650    _2
$a sexuální faktory $7 D012737
651    _2
$a Česká republika $x epidemiologie $7 D018153
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Ngo, Ondrej $u Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Grega, Tomas $u Department of Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Military University Hospital, Prague
700    1_
$a Kmochova, Klara $u Department of Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Military University Hospital, Prague
700    1_
$a Voska, Michal $u Department of Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Military University Hospital, Prague
700    1_
$a Buckova, Barbora $u Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Majek, Ondrej $u Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Zavoral, Miroslav $u Department of Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Military University Hospital, Prague
700    1_
$a Suchanek, Stepan $u Department of Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Military University Hospital, Prague
773    0_
$w MED00001604 $t European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) $x 1473-5709 $g Roč. 29, č. 4 (2020), s. 294-302
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32543806 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20211013 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20211026132728 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1715403 $s 1147161
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 29 $c 4 $d 294-302 $e - $i 1473-5709 $m European journal of cancer prevention $n Eur J Cancer Prev $x MED00001604
GRA    __
$a NV16-29614A $p MZ0
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20211013

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...