Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Prostate deformation during hypofractionated radiotherapy: an analysis of implanted fiducial marker displacement

L. Knybel, J. Cvek, T. Blazek, A. Binarova, T. Parackova, K. Resova

. 2021 ; 16 (1) : 235. [pub] 20211207

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22011736

Grantová podpora
FNOs/2021 Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
FNOs/2021 Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky

BACKGROUND: To report prostate deformation during treatment, based on an analysis of fiducial marker positional differences in a large sample. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study included 144 patients treated with prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy after implantation in each of 4 gold fiducial markers (FMs), which were located and numbered consistently. The center of mass of the FMs was recorded for every pair of X-ray images taken during treatment. The distance between each pair of fiducials in the live X-ray images is calculated and compared with the respective distances as determined in the CT volume. The RBE is the difference between these distances. Mean RBE and intrafraction and interfraction RBE were evaluated. The intrafraction and intefraction RBE variability were defined as the standard deviation, respectively, of all RBE during 1 treatment fraction and of the mean daily RBE over the whole treatment course. RESULTS: We analyzed 720 treatment fractions comprising 24,453 orthogonal X-ray image acquisitions. We observed a trend to higher RBE related to FM4 (apex) during treatment. The fiducial marker in the prostate apex could not be used in 16% of observations, in which RBE was > 2.5 mm. The mean RBEavg was 0.93 ± 0.39 mm (range 0.32-1.79 mm) over the 5 fractions. The RBEavg was significantly lower for the first and second fraction compared with the others (P < .001). The interfraction variability of RBEavg was 0.26 ± 0.16 mm (range 0.04-0.74 mm). The mean intrafraction variability of all FMs was 0.45 ± 0.25 mm. The highest Pearson correlation coefficient was observed between FM2 and FM3 (middle left and right prostate) (R = 0.78; P < .001). Every combination with FM4 yielded lower coefficients (range 0.66-0.71; P < .001), indicating different deformation of the prostate apex. CONCLUSIONS: Ideally, prostate deformation is generally small, but it is very sensitive to rectal and bladder filling. We observed RBE up to 11.3 mm. The overall correlation between FMs was affected by shifts of individual fiducials, indicating that the prostate is not a "rigid" organ. Systematic change of RBE average between subsequent fractions indicates a systematic change in prostate shape.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22011736
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220506130754.0
007      
ta
008      
220425s2021 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s13014-021-01958-4 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)34876173
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Knybel, Lukas $u Department of Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. listopadu 1790, 708 52, Ostrava, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Prostate deformation during hypofractionated radiotherapy: an analysis of implanted fiducial marker displacement / $c L. Knybel, J. Cvek, T. Blazek, A. Binarova, T. Parackova, K. Resova
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: To report prostate deformation during treatment, based on an analysis of fiducial marker positional differences in a large sample. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study included 144 patients treated with prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy after implantation in each of 4 gold fiducial markers (FMs), which were located and numbered consistently. The center of mass of the FMs was recorded for every pair of X-ray images taken during treatment. The distance between each pair of fiducials in the live X-ray images is calculated and compared with the respective distances as determined in the CT volume. The RBE is the difference between these distances. Mean RBE and intrafraction and interfraction RBE were evaluated. The intrafraction and intefraction RBE variability were defined as the standard deviation, respectively, of all RBE during 1 treatment fraction and of the mean daily RBE over the whole treatment course. RESULTS: We analyzed 720 treatment fractions comprising 24,453 orthogonal X-ray image acquisitions. We observed a trend to higher RBE related to FM4 (apex) during treatment. The fiducial marker in the prostate apex could not be used in 16% of observations, in which RBE was > 2.5 mm. The mean RBEavg was 0.93 ± 0.39 mm (range 0.32-1.79 mm) over the 5 fractions. The RBEavg was significantly lower for the first and second fraction compared with the others (P < .001). The interfraction variability of RBEavg was 0.26 ± 0.16 mm (range 0.04-0.74 mm). The mean intrafraction variability of all FMs was 0.45 ± 0.25 mm. The highest Pearson correlation coefficient was observed between FM2 and FM3 (middle left and right prostate) (R = 0.78; P < .001). Every combination with FM4 yielded lower coefficients (range 0.66-0.71; P < .001), indicating different deformation of the prostate apex. CONCLUSIONS: Ideally, prostate deformation is generally small, but it is very sensitive to rectal and bladder filling. We observed RBE up to 11.3 mm. The overall correlation between FMs was affected by shifts of individual fiducials, indicating that the prostate is not a "rigid" organ. Systematic change of RBE average between subsequent fractions indicates a systematic change in prostate shape.
650    _2
$a zaměřovací značky pro radioterapii $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D057918
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a počítačové zpracování obrazu $x metody $7 D007091
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a pohyb $7 D009068
650    _2
$a nádory prostaty $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patologie $x radioterapie $7 D011471
650    12
$a protézy a implantáty $7 D019736
650    _2
$a hypofrakcionace při ozařování $7 D000069473
650    _2
$a celková dávka radioterapie $7 D011879
650    _2
$a plánování radioterapie pomocí počítače $x metody $7 D011880
650    _2
$a radioterapie řízená obrazem $x metody $7 D061089
650    _2
$a radioterapie s modulovanou intenzitou $x metody $7 D050397
650    _2
$a počítačová rentgenová tomografie $x metody $7 D014057
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Cvek, Jakub $u Department of Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. listopadu 1790, 708 52, Ostrava, Czech Republic. jakub.cvek@fno.cz $1 https://orcid.org/0000000315791792
700    1_
$a Blazek, Tomas $u Department of Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. listopadu 1790, 708 52, Ostrava, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Binarova, Andrea $u Department of Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. listopadu 1790, 708 52, Ostrava, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Parackova, Tereza $u Department of Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. listopadu 1790, 708 52, Ostrava, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Resova, Kamila $u Department of Oncology, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. listopadu 1790, 708 52, Ostrava, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00165460 $t Radiation oncology (London, England) $x 1748-717X $g Roč. 16, č. 1 (2021), s. 235
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34876173 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220425 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220506130746 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1789367 $s 1162934
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 16 $c 1 $d 235 $e 20211207 $i 1748-717X $m Radiation oncology $n Radiat. oncol. $x MED00165460
GRA    __
$a FNOs/2021 $p Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
GRA    __
$a FNOs/2021 $p Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220425

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...