BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy and targeted therapy are currently two alternative backbones in the therapy of BRAF-mutated malignant melanoma. However, predictive biomarkers that would help with treatment selection are lacking. METHODS: This retrospective study investigated outcomes of anti-programmed death receptor-1 monotherapy and targeted therapy in the first-line setting in patients with metastatic BRAF-mutated melanoma, focusing on clinical and laboratory parameters associated with treatment outcome. RESULTS: Data from 174 patients were analysed. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 17.0 months (95% CI; 8-39) and 12.5 months (95% CI; 9-14.2) for immunotherapy and targeted therapy, respectively. The 3-year PFS rate was 39% for immunotherapy and 25% for targeted therapy. The objective response rate was 72% and 51% for targeted therapy and immunotherapy. The median overall (OS) survival for immunotherapy has not been reached and was 23.6 months (95% CI; 16.1-38.2) for targeted therapy, with a 3-year survival rate of 63% and 40%, respectively. In a univariate analysis, age < 70 years, a higher number of metastatic sites, elevated serum LDH and a neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio above the cut-off value were associated with inferior PFS regardless of the therapy received, but only serum LDH level and the presence of lung metastases remained significant predictors of PFS in a multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Present real-world data document the high effectiveness of immunotherapy and targeted therapy. Although targeted therapy had higher response rates, immunotherapy improved PFS and OS. While the prognostic value of LDH was confirmed, the potential use of blood cell count-derived parameters to predict outcomes needs further investigation.

Department of Clinical Radiotherapy and Oncology University Hospital in Hradec Kralove Hradec Kralove Czech Republic

Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute and Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

Department of Dermatovenereology 3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University and Kralovske Vinohrady University Hospital Prague Czech Republic

Department of Oncology County Hospital České Budějovice Czech Republic

Department of Oncology Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry Palacký University and University Hospital Olomouc Czech Republic

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org