Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Young age and adequate BCG are key factors for optimal BCG treatment efficacy in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer

K. Liu, R. Nicoletti, H. Zhao, X. Chen, H. Wu, CH. Leung, D. D'Andrea, E. Laukhtina, F. Soria, A. Gallioli, ML. Wroclawski, D. Castellani, V. Gauhar, JG. Rivas, D. Enikeev, P. Gontero, SF. Shariat, PK. Chiu, CF. Ng, JY. Teoh

. 2024 ; 42 (1) : 547. [pub] 20240927

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24018853

Grantová podpora
8601521 UGC Research Matching Fund
14117421 General Research Fund and Early Career Scheme

E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 1997-02-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 2000-02-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 1997-02-01 do Před 1 rokem

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of ageing on survival outcomes in Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) treated non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients and its synergy with adequate BCG treatment. METHOD: Patients with NMIBC who received BCG treatment from 2001 to 2020 were divided into group 1 (< = 70 years) and group 2 (> 70 years). Overall Survival (OS), Cancer-Specific Survival (CSS), Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS), and Progression-Free Survival (PFS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to adjust potential confounding factors and to estimate Hazard Ratio (HR) and 95% Confidence Interval (CI). Subgroup analysis was performed according to adequate versus inadequate BCG treatment. RESULTS: Overall, 2602 NMIBC patients were included: 1051 (40.4%) and 1551 (59.6%) in groups 1 and 2, respectively. At median follow-up of 11.0 years, group 1 (< = 70 years) was associated with better OS, CSS, and RFS, but not PFS as compared to group 2 (> 70 years). At subgroup analysis, patients in group 1 treated with adequate BCG showed better OS, CSS, RFS, and PFS as compared with inadequate BCG treatment in group 2, while patients in group 2 receiving adequate BCG treatment had 41% less progression than those treated with inadequate BCG from the same group. CONCLUSIONS: Being younger (< = 70 years) was associated with better OS, CSS, and RFS, but not PFS. Older patients (> 70 years) who received adequate BCG treatment had similar PFS as those younger with adequate BCG treatment.

2nd Faculty of Medicine Hospital Motol Department of Urology Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit University of Montreal Health Centre Montreal Canada

Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Science University of Florence Florence Italy

Department of Urology Città Della Salute E Della Scienza University of Torino School of Medicine Turin Italy

Department of Urology Clinico San Carlos University Hospital Madrid Spain

Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria

Department of Urology Faculdade de Medicina Do ABC Santo André Brazil

Department of Urology Fundació Puigvert Autonoma University of Barcelona Barcelona Spain

Department of Urology Hospital Beneficencia Portuguesa de Sao Paulo São Paulo Brazil

Department of Urology Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein São Paulo Brazil

Department of Urology Ng Teng Fong General Hospital National University Health System Singapore Singapore

Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Dallas TX USA

Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY USA

Division of Urology Department of Surgical Sciences San Giovanni Battista Hospital University of Studies of Torino 10024 Turin Italy

Division of Urology Rabin Medical Center Petah Tikva Israel

Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research Al Ahliyya Amman University Amman Jordan

Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology Vienna Austria

Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine Iranian EBM Center A Joanna Briggs Institute Center of Excellence Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Tabriz Iran

S H Ho Urology Centre Faculty of Medicine Department of Surgery The Chinese University of Hong Kong 4 F LCW Clinical Sciences Building Prince of Wales Hospital Shatin Hong Kong

Urology Unit Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Delle Marche Università Politecnica Delle Marche Ancona Italy

Urothelial Cancer Working Group European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists Amsterdam Netherlands

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24018853
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20241024111113.0
007      
ta
008      
241015s2024 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00345-024-05218-4 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39331198
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Liu, Kang $u S. H. Ho Urology Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 4/F LCW Clinical Sciences Building, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong
245    10
$a Young age and adequate BCG are key factors for optimal BCG treatment efficacy in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer / $c K. Liu, R. Nicoletti, H. Zhao, X. Chen, H. Wu, CH. Leung, D. D'Andrea, E. Laukhtina, F. Soria, A. Gallioli, ML. Wroclawski, D. Castellani, V. Gauhar, JG. Rivas, D. Enikeev, P. Gontero, SF. Shariat, PK. Chiu, CF. Ng, JY. Teoh
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of ageing on survival outcomes in Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) treated non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients and its synergy with adequate BCG treatment. METHOD: Patients with NMIBC who received BCG treatment from 2001 to 2020 were divided into group 1 (< = 70 years) and group 2 (> 70 years). Overall Survival (OS), Cancer-Specific Survival (CSS), Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS), and Progression-Free Survival (PFS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to adjust potential confounding factors and to estimate Hazard Ratio (HR) and 95% Confidence Interval (CI). Subgroup analysis was performed according to adequate versus inadequate BCG treatment. RESULTS: Overall, 2602 NMIBC patients were included: 1051 (40.4%) and 1551 (59.6%) in groups 1 and 2, respectively. At median follow-up of 11.0 years, group 1 (< = 70 years) was associated with better OS, CSS, and RFS, but not PFS as compared to group 2 (> 70 years). At subgroup analysis, patients in group 1 treated with adequate BCG showed better OS, CSS, RFS, and PFS as compared with inadequate BCG treatment in group 2, while patients in group 2 receiving adequate BCG treatment had 41% less progression than those treated with inadequate BCG from the same group. CONCLUSIONS: Being younger (< = 70 years) was associated with better OS, CSS, and RFS, but not PFS. Older patients (> 70 years) who received adequate BCG treatment had similar PFS as those younger with adequate BCG treatment.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a nádory močového měchýře $x farmakoterapie $x patologie $x terapie $x mortalita $7 D001749
650    12
$a BCG vakcína $x terapeutické užití $7 D001500
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    12
$a invazivní růst nádoru $7 D009361
650    _2
$a věkové faktory $7 D000367
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    12
$a adjuvancia imunologická $x terapeutické užití $7 D000276
650    _2
$a míra přežití $7 D015996
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a aplikace intravezikální $7 D000283
650    _2
$a nádory močového měchýře neinvadující svalovinu $7 D000093284
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Nicoletti, Rossella $u S. H. Ho Urology Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 4/F LCW Clinical Sciences Building, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong $u Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Science, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
700    1_
$a Zhao, Hongda $u S. H. Ho Urology Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 4/F LCW Clinical Sciences Building, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong
700    1_
$a Chen, Xuan $u S. H. Ho Urology Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 4/F LCW Clinical Sciences Building, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong
700    1_
$a Wu, Hongwei $u S. H. Ho Urology Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 4/F LCW Clinical Sciences Building, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong
700    1_
$a Leung, Chi-Ho $u S. H. Ho Urology Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 4/F LCW Clinical Sciences Building, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong
700    1_
$a D'Andrea, David $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Urothelial Cancer Working Group, European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists (EAU-YAU), Amsterdam, Netherlands
700    1_
$a Laukhtina, Ekaterina $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
700    1_
$a Soria, Francesco $u Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, 10024, Turin, Italy
700    1_
$a Gallioli, Andrea $u Urothelial Cancer Working Group, European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists (EAU-YAU), Amsterdam, Netherlands $u Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
700    1_
$a Wroclawski, Marcelo Langer $u Department of Urology, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil $u Department of Urology, Hospital Beneficencia Portuguesa de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil $u Department of Urology, Faculdade de Medicina Do ABC, Santo André, Brazil
700    1_
$a Castellani, Daniele $u Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Delle Marche, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
700    1_
$a Gauhar, Vineet $u Department of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
700    1_
$a Rivas, Juan Gomez $u Department of Urology, Clinico San Carlos University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
700    1_
$a Enikeev, Dmitry $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria $u Division of Urology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel
700    1_
$a Gontero, Paolo $u Department of Urology, Città Della Salute E Della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
700    1_
$a Shariat, Shahrokh F $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Motol, Department of Urology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA $u Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA $u Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan $u Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada $u Research Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, Iranian EBM Center: A Joanna Briggs Institute Center of Excellence, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
700    1_
$a Chiu, Peter Ka-Fung $u S. H. Ho Urology Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 4/F LCW Clinical Sciences Building, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong
700    1_
$a Ng, Chi-Fai $u S. H. Ho Urology Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 4/F LCW Clinical Sciences Building, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong. ngcf@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk
700    1_
$a Teoh, Jeremy Yuen-Chun $u S. H. Ho Urology Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 4/F LCW Clinical Sciences Building, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong. jeremyteoh@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. jeremyteoh@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk $u Urothelial Cancer Working Group, European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists (EAU-YAU), Amsterdam, Netherlands. jeremyteoh@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk
773    0_
$w MED00004739 $t World journal of urology $x 1433-8726 $g Roč. 42, č. 1 (2024), s. 547
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39331198 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20241015 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20241024111107 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2201613 $s 1230826
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 42 $c 1 $d 547 $e 20240927 $i 1433-8726 $m World journal of urology $n World J Urol $x MED00004739
GRA    __
$a 8601521 $p UGC Research Matching Fund
GRA    __
$a 14117421 $p General Research Fund and Early Career Scheme
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20241015

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...