Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging provides accurate staging of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, but is less preferred by patients

L. Lambert, M. Wagnerova, P. Vodicka, K. Benesova, D. Zogala, M. Trneny, A. Burgetova

. 2025 ; 17 (1) : 99207. [pub] 20250128

Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25008554

BACKGROUND: Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (wbMRI) allows general assessment of systemic cancers including lymphomas without radiation burden. AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of wbMRI in the staging of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), determine the value of individual MRI sequences, and assess patients' concerns with wbMRI. METHODS: In this single-center prospective study, adult patients newly diagnosed with systemic DLBCL underwent wbMRI on a 3T scanner [diffusion weighted images with background suppression (DWIBS), T2, short tau inversion recovery (STIR), contrast-enhanced T1] and fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) (reference standard). The involvement of 12 nodal regions and extranodal sites was evaluated on wbMRI and PET/CT. The utility of wbMRI sequences was rated on a five-point scale (0 = not useful, 4 = very useful). Patients received a questionnaire regarding wbMRI. RESULTS: Of 60 eligible patients, 14 (23%) were enrolled and completed the study. The sensitivity of wbMRI in the nodal involvement (182 nodal sites) was 0.84, with 0.99 specificity, positive predictive value of 0.96, negative predictive value of 0.97, and 0.97 accuracy. PET/CT and wbMRI were concordant both in extranodal involvement (13 instances) and staging (κ = 1.0). The mean scores of the utility of MRI sequences were 3.71 ± 0.73 for DWIBS, 2.64 ± 0.84 for T1, 2.14 ± 0.77 for STIR, and 1.29 ± 0.73 for T2 (P < 0.0001). Patients were mostly concerned about the enclosed environment and duration of the MRI examination (27% of patients). CONCLUSION: The wbMRI exhibited excellent sensitivity and specificity in staging DLBCL. DWIBS and contrast-enhanced T1 were rated as the most useful sequences. Patients were less willing to undergo wbMRI as a second examination parallel to PET/CT, especially owing to the long duration and the enclosed environment.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25008554
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250422095649.0
007      
ta
008      
250408s2025 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.4329/wjr.v17.i1.99207 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39876887
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Lambert, Lukas $u Department of Imaging Methods, Motol University Hospital and Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague 15006, Czech Republic. lukas.lambert@vfn.cz
245    10
$a Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging provides accurate staging of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, but is less preferred by patients / $c L. Lambert, M. Wagnerova, P. Vodicka, K. Benesova, D. Zogala, M. Trneny, A. Burgetova
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (wbMRI) allows general assessment of systemic cancers including lymphomas without radiation burden. AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of wbMRI in the staging of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), determine the value of individual MRI sequences, and assess patients' concerns with wbMRI. METHODS: In this single-center prospective study, adult patients newly diagnosed with systemic DLBCL underwent wbMRI on a 3T scanner [diffusion weighted images with background suppression (DWIBS), T2, short tau inversion recovery (STIR), contrast-enhanced T1] and fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) (reference standard). The involvement of 12 nodal regions and extranodal sites was evaluated on wbMRI and PET/CT. The utility of wbMRI sequences was rated on a five-point scale (0 = not useful, 4 = very useful). Patients received a questionnaire regarding wbMRI. RESULTS: Of 60 eligible patients, 14 (23%) were enrolled and completed the study. The sensitivity of wbMRI in the nodal involvement (182 nodal sites) was 0.84, with 0.99 specificity, positive predictive value of 0.96, negative predictive value of 0.97, and 0.97 accuracy. PET/CT and wbMRI were concordant both in extranodal involvement (13 instances) and staging (κ = 1.0). The mean scores of the utility of MRI sequences were 3.71 ± 0.73 for DWIBS, 2.64 ± 0.84 for T1, 2.14 ± 0.77 for STIR, and 1.29 ± 0.73 for T2 (P < 0.0001). Patients were mostly concerned about the enclosed environment and duration of the MRI examination (27% of patients). CONCLUSION: The wbMRI exhibited excellent sensitivity and specificity in staging DLBCL. DWIBS and contrast-enhanced T1 were rated as the most useful sequences. Patients were less willing to undergo wbMRI as a second examination parallel to PET/CT, especially owing to the long duration and the enclosed environment.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Wagnerova, Monika $u Department of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague 12808, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Vodicka, Prokop $u First Department of Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague 12808, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Benesova, Katerina $u First Department of Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague 12808, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Zogala, David $u Institute of Nuclear Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague 12808, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Trneny, Marek $u First Department of Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague 12808, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Burgetova, Andrea $u Department of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague 12808, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00177014 $t World journal of radiology $x 1949-8470 $g Roč. 17, č. 1 (2025), s. 99207
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39876887 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250408 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250422095651 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2306416 $s 1245629
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 17 $c 1 $d 99207 $e 20250128 $i 1949-8470 $m World journal of radiology $n World J Radiol $x MED00177014
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250408

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...