Clinical and economic consequences of pancreatic fistula after elective pancreatic resection
Jazyk angličtina Země Singapur Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
24103285
DOI
10.1016/s1499-3872(13)60084-3
PII: S1499-3872(13)60084-3
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- ambulantní péče ekonomika MeSH
- časové faktory MeSH
- délka pobytu ekonomika MeSH
- elektivní chirurgické výkony MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- náklady a analýza nákladů MeSH
- nemocnice - náklady * MeSH
- pankreatektomie škodlivé účinky ekonomika MeSH
- pankreatická píštěl diagnóza ekonomika etiologie terapie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- stupeň závažnosti nemoci MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
BACKGROUND: Postoperative pancreatic fistula is the main cause of morbidity after pancreatic resection. This study aimed to quantify the clinical and economic consequences of pancreatic fistula in a medium-volume pancreatic surgery center. METHODS: Hospital records from patients who had undergone elective pancreatic resection in our department were identified. Pancreatic fistula was defined according to the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF). The consequences of pancreatic fistula were determined by treatment cost, hospital stay, and out-patient follow-up until the pancreatic fistula was completely healed. All costs of the treatment are calculated in Euros. The cost increase index was calculated for pancreatic fistula of grades A, B, and C as multiples of the total cost for the no fistula group. RESULTS: In 54 months, 102 patients underwent elective pancreatic resections. Forty patients (39.2%) developed pancreatic fistula, and 54 patients (52.9%) had one or more complications. The median length of hospital stay for the no fistula, grades A, B, and C fistula groups was 12.5, 14, 20, and 59 days, respectively. The hospital stay of patients with fistula of grades B and C was significantly longer than that of patients with no fistula (P<0.001). The median total cost of the treatment was 4952, 4679, 8239, and 30 820 Euros in the no fistula, grades A, B, and C fistula groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The grading recommended by the ISGPF is useful for comparing the clinical severity of fistula and for analyzing the clinical and economic consequences of pancreatic fistula. Pancreatic fistula prolongs the hospital stay and increases the cost of treatment in proportion to the severity of the fistula.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
Impact of postoperative complications on clinical and economic consequences in pancreatic surgery
Intra-abdominal drainage following pancreatic resection: A systematic review
Pancreatic fistula and postoperative pancreatitis after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer
Surgical technique in distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review of randomized trials